博士生信息素养:健康科学领域的诠释学辩证法研究

IF 1.9 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
E. Nylander, Margareta Hjort
{"title":"博士生信息素养:健康科学领域的诠释学辩证法研究","authors":"E. Nylander, Margareta Hjort","doi":"10.1080/13614533.2020.1819353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Doctoral studies offer a unique phase in the development and legitimisation of researchers, in which PhD students shift from consumption to production of knowledge. While literature exists concerning the information behaviour of graduate students and researchers, there is little work which focuses specifically on the information literacies of PhD students within the health sciences. To better understand this user group, we undertook a qualitative study at the Research School of Health and Welfare in Jönköping, Sweden. Twelve open-ended interviews with both PhD students and their supervisors were conducted and analysed according to a hermeneutic dialectic process. Findings revealed that the supervisors commonly assumed that PhD students already have necessary information literacy skills. Yet some of the students self-reported feeling uncertain when searching and getting ‘stuck’ with one strategy. Responses also indicated that the PhD students and their supervisors were often unaware of what services and support the library could provide.","PeriodicalId":38971,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1819353","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Literacies of PhD Students: A Hermeneutic Dialectic Study within the Health Sciences\",\"authors\":\"E. Nylander, Margareta Hjort\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13614533.2020.1819353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Doctoral studies offer a unique phase in the development and legitimisation of researchers, in which PhD students shift from consumption to production of knowledge. While literature exists concerning the information behaviour of graduate students and researchers, there is little work which focuses specifically on the information literacies of PhD students within the health sciences. To better understand this user group, we undertook a qualitative study at the Research School of Health and Welfare in Jönköping, Sweden. Twelve open-ended interviews with both PhD students and their supervisors were conducted and analysed according to a hermeneutic dialectic process. Findings revealed that the supervisors commonly assumed that PhD students already have necessary information literacy skills. Yet some of the students self-reported feeling uncertain when searching and getting ‘stuck’ with one strategy. Responses also indicated that the PhD students and their supervisors were often unaware of what services and support the library could provide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Review of Academic Librarianship\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13614533.2020.1819353\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Review of Academic Librarianship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1819353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Academic Librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1819353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

博士研究为研究人员的发展和合法化提供了一个独特的阶段,在这个阶段,博士生从知识消费转向知识生产。虽然存在关于研究生和研究人员信息行为的文献,但很少有工作专门关注健康科学领域博士生的信息素养。为了更好地了解这一用户群体,我们在瑞典Jönköping的卫生与福利研究学院进行了一项定性研究。对博士生及其导师进行了12次开放式访谈,并根据解释学辩证法过程进行了分析。调查结果显示,导师普遍认为博士生已经具备必要的信息素养技能。然而,一些学生自我报告说,在搜索时感到不确定,并且“卡住”了一种策略。调查结果还表明,博士生和他们的导师往往不知道图书馆可以提供哪些服务和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information Literacies of PhD Students: A Hermeneutic Dialectic Study within the Health Sciences
Abstract Doctoral studies offer a unique phase in the development and legitimisation of researchers, in which PhD students shift from consumption to production of knowledge. While literature exists concerning the information behaviour of graduate students and researchers, there is little work which focuses specifically on the information literacies of PhD students within the health sciences. To better understand this user group, we undertook a qualitative study at the Research School of Health and Welfare in Jönköping, Sweden. Twelve open-ended interviews with both PhD students and their supervisors were conducted and analysed according to a hermeneutic dialectic process. Findings revealed that the supervisors commonly assumed that PhD students already have necessary information literacy skills. Yet some of the students self-reported feeling uncertain when searching and getting ‘stuck’ with one strategy. Responses also indicated that the PhD students and their supervisors were often unaware of what services and support the library could provide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Review of Academic Librarianship
New Review of Academic Librarianship Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信