数学教育研究中的教学、教师和教学资源

IF 1.4 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jana Višňovská, J. Cortina
{"title":"数学教育研究中的教学、教师和教学资源","authors":"Jana Višňovská, J. Cortina","doi":"10.1080/1359866X.2022.2045567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We address two of the challenges that were recently raised in APJTE editorial. The editorial aimed to encourage the APJTE research community, and the field of teacher education broadly, to engage in research, in which a complex view of teaching is assumed, explored, and proactively supported. We offer a perspective on the standing of two of the outlined challenges in mathematics education research and notes on what pursuing these challenges may entail. Specifically, we comment on the challenges of (1) reclaiming a practically meaningful, intellectually rigorous and politically astute conception of teaching, and (2) dealing well with and rigorously theorising the complexity of education, teaching, and teacher education. We start with a brief (and necessarily reductive) account of the history of mathematics education research domain and highlight how the conceptions of teachers and teaching were shaped through the research endeavours. We bring to the fore the implications that the dominant research approaches had for resources for teaching school mathematics. In this context, we turn to design research methodology in mathematics education and illustrate how the methodology, when coupled with the orientation of designing for teachers, can assist in the researchers’ pursuits of the outlined challenges.","PeriodicalId":47276,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching, teachers, and teaching resources in mathematics education research\",\"authors\":\"Jana Višňovská, J. Cortina\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359866X.2022.2045567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We address two of the challenges that were recently raised in APJTE editorial. The editorial aimed to encourage the APJTE research community, and the field of teacher education broadly, to engage in research, in which a complex view of teaching is assumed, explored, and proactively supported. We offer a perspective on the standing of two of the outlined challenges in mathematics education research and notes on what pursuing these challenges may entail. Specifically, we comment on the challenges of (1) reclaiming a practically meaningful, intellectually rigorous and politically astute conception of teaching, and (2) dealing well with and rigorously theorising the complexity of education, teaching, and teacher education. We start with a brief (and necessarily reductive) account of the history of mathematics education research domain and highlight how the conceptions of teachers and teaching were shaped through the research endeavours. We bring to the fore the implications that the dominant research approaches had for resources for teaching school mathematics. In this context, we turn to design research methodology in mathematics education and illustrate how the methodology, when coupled with the orientation of designing for teachers, can assist in the researchers’ pursuits of the outlined challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2022.2045567\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2022.2045567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要我们讨论了最近在APJTE社论中提出的两个挑战。这篇社论旨在鼓励APJTE研究界和广大教师教育领域参与研究,其中假设、探索和积极支持复杂的教学观。我们对数学教育研究中概述的两个挑战的地位进行了展望,并指出了追求这些挑战可能带来的后果。具体而言,我们评论了以下挑战:(1)重新树立一个有实际意义、智力严谨和政治敏锐的教学概念,以及(2)处理好教育、教学和教师教育的复杂性并严格理论化。我们从数学教育研究领域的历史开始进行简要的(必然是还原性的)描述,并强调教师和教学的概念是如何通过研究工作形成的。我们突出了主流研究方法对学校数学教学资源的影响。在这种背景下,我们转向数学教育中的设计研究方法论,并说明该方法论与教师设计的方向相结合,如何有助于研究人员追求所概述的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching, teachers, and teaching resources in mathematics education research
ABSTRACT We address two of the challenges that were recently raised in APJTE editorial. The editorial aimed to encourage the APJTE research community, and the field of teacher education broadly, to engage in research, in which a complex view of teaching is assumed, explored, and proactively supported. We offer a perspective on the standing of two of the outlined challenges in mathematics education research and notes on what pursuing these challenges may entail. Specifically, we comment on the challenges of (1) reclaiming a practically meaningful, intellectually rigorous and politically astute conception of teaching, and (2) dealing well with and rigorously theorising the complexity of education, teaching, and teacher education. We start with a brief (and necessarily reductive) account of the history of mathematics education research domain and highlight how the conceptions of teachers and teaching were shaped through the research endeavours. We bring to the fore the implications that the dominant research approaches had for resources for teaching school mathematics. In this context, we turn to design research methodology in mathematics education and illustrate how the methodology, when coupled with the orientation of designing for teachers, can assist in the researchers’ pursuits of the outlined challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: This journal promotes rigorous research that makes a significant contribution to advancing knowledge in teacher education across early childhood, primary, secondary, vocational education and training, and higher education. The journal editors invite for peer review theoretically informed papers - including, but not limited to, empirically grounded research - which focus on significant issues relevant to an international audience in regards to: Teacher education (including initial teacher education and ongoing professional education) of teachers internationally; The cultural, economic, political, social and/or technological dimensions and contexts of teacher education; Change, stability, reform and resistance in (and relating to) teacher education; Improving the quality and impact of research in teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信