{"title":"身份嫁接:儒家模式大学对新加坡华裔工程人才的影响","authors":"D. Lee","doi":"10.1080/01596306.2023.2200079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Singapore’s higher education history had students involved in anti-colonial movements. This study examines how historical discourses on state efforts to manage university student movements (1953–1980) unintentionally reproduce in the intercultural business practices of today’s professionals. It explores how professional accounts of intercultural business practices resonate with historical memories of student movements, with individual accounts varying according to their family and educational backgrounds. Interviews with 30 Chinese Singaporean engineering professionals were compared and analysed based on their childhood home language, socioeconomic status, and whether they attended universities locally or overseas. Results show that the respondents selectively and unintentionally reconstruct historical themes to understand their cultural identities and professional practice. They converge on which aspect of higher education history resonates with them based on their family and educational backgrounds. This study shows how current actions have long-term unintended consequences. The discussion takes a postcolonial perspective of the global implications of the findings on individuals, national identity and higher education development.","PeriodicalId":47908,"journal":{"name":"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","volume":"44 1","pages":"441 - 461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identity grafting: influence of Confucian model universities on Chinese Singaporean engineering professionals\",\"authors\":\"D. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01596306.2023.2200079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Singapore’s higher education history had students involved in anti-colonial movements. This study examines how historical discourses on state efforts to manage university student movements (1953–1980) unintentionally reproduce in the intercultural business practices of today’s professionals. It explores how professional accounts of intercultural business practices resonate with historical memories of student movements, with individual accounts varying according to their family and educational backgrounds. Interviews with 30 Chinese Singaporean engineering professionals were compared and analysed based on their childhood home language, socioeconomic status, and whether they attended universities locally or overseas. Results show that the respondents selectively and unintentionally reconstruct historical themes to understand their cultural identities and professional practice. They converge on which aspect of higher education history resonates with them based on their family and educational backgrounds. This study shows how current actions have long-term unintended consequences. The discussion takes a postcolonial perspective of the global implications of the findings on individuals, national identity and higher education development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"441 - 461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2023.2200079\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2023.2200079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identity grafting: influence of Confucian model universities on Chinese Singaporean engineering professionals
ABSTRACT Singapore’s higher education history had students involved in anti-colonial movements. This study examines how historical discourses on state efforts to manage university student movements (1953–1980) unintentionally reproduce in the intercultural business practices of today’s professionals. It explores how professional accounts of intercultural business practices resonate with historical memories of student movements, with individual accounts varying according to their family and educational backgrounds. Interviews with 30 Chinese Singaporean engineering professionals were compared and analysed based on their childhood home language, socioeconomic status, and whether they attended universities locally or overseas. Results show that the respondents selectively and unintentionally reconstruct historical themes to understand their cultural identities and professional practice. They converge on which aspect of higher education history resonates with them based on their family and educational backgrounds. This study shows how current actions have long-term unintended consequences. The discussion takes a postcolonial perspective of the global implications of the findings on individuals, national identity and higher education development.
期刊介绍:
Discourse is an international, fully peer-reviewed journal publishing contemporary research and theorising in the cultural politics of education. The journal publishes academic articles from throughout the world which contribute to contemporary debates on the new social, cultural and political configurations that now mark education as a highly contested but important cultural site. Discourse adopts a broadly critical orientation, but is not tied to any particular ideological, disciplinary or methodological position. It encourages interdisciplinary approaches to the analysis of educational theory, policy and practice. It welcomes papers which explore speculative ideas in education, are written in innovative ways, or are presented in experimental ways.