Michael Müller-Korbsch , Antonia Kietaibl , Yves Haufe , Peter Fasching
{"title":"使用自动胰岛素输送系统的1型糖尿病患者动态血糖谱的变化-对真实世界数据的两年随访回顾性分析","authors":"Michael Müller-Korbsch , Antonia Kietaibl , Yves Haufe , Peter Fasching","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The number of available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems is increasing in Austria and people with diabetes (PwD) replace sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy more and more frequently. The present study is the two years follow-up of our prior monocentric, retrospective analysis conducted between 2019 and 2021, comparing SAP and open-source AID systems in people with type 1 diabetes. This second-year analysis included 25 PwD and investigated glycemic changes based on ambulatory glucose profiles (AGP). In comparison to the first year, a worsening of mean glucose (125.4 to 135.2 mg/dl, <em>P</em> = 0.038), time in range ((TIR), 84.2 to 77.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.012), time above range ((TAR), 11.6% to 18.5%, <em>P</em> = 0.017) and glycemia risk index ((GRI), 24.8 to 35.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.026) was observed. The reduction of mean glucose and glucose variability with AID in the first year was due to a significant decrease in time in hyperglycemia with resulting higher TIR and lower GRI. In this second-year follow up, TIR and GRI showed a significant deterioration, a familiar phenomenon in diabetology. However, open-source AID systems showed continuous safety, as there was no increase in time below range (TBR) even after two years. Despite the slight deterioration in the glycemic parameters, open-source AID systems were able to demonstrate sufficient glycemic control according to international consensus guidelines while offering the characteristic benefits of a reduced burden of diabetes management. A descriptive comparison of different AID algorithms indicated an improved glycemic control with more advanced features such as basal rate modification, auto bolus function and autotuning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in ambulatory glucose profile in people with type 1 diabetes using an automated insulin delivery system - two year follow-up retrospective analysis of real-world data\",\"authors\":\"Michael Müller-Korbsch , Antonia Kietaibl , Yves Haufe , Peter Fasching\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The number of available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems is increasing in Austria and people with diabetes (PwD) replace sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy more and more frequently. The present study is the two years follow-up of our prior monocentric, retrospective analysis conducted between 2019 and 2021, comparing SAP and open-source AID systems in people with type 1 diabetes. This second-year analysis included 25 PwD and investigated glycemic changes based on ambulatory glucose profiles (AGP). In comparison to the first year, a worsening of mean glucose (125.4 to 135.2 mg/dl, <em>P</em> = 0.038), time in range ((TIR), 84.2 to 77.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.012), time above range ((TAR), 11.6% to 18.5%, <em>P</em> = 0.017) and glycemia risk index ((GRI), 24.8 to 35.0%, <em>P</em> = 0.026) was observed. The reduction of mean glucose and glucose variability with AID in the first year was due to a significant decrease in time in hyperglycemia with resulting higher TIR and lower GRI. In this second-year follow up, TIR and GRI showed a significant deterioration, a familiar phenomenon in diabetology. However, open-source AID systems showed continuous safety, as there was no increase in time below range (TBR) even after two years. Despite the slight deterioration in the glycemic parameters, open-source AID systems were able to demonstrate sufficient glycemic control according to international consensus guidelines while offering the characteristic benefits of a reduced burden of diabetes management. A descriptive comparison of different AID algorithms indicated an improved glycemic control with more advanced features such as basal rate modification, auto bolus function and autotuning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970623000227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970623000227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在奥地利,可用的自动胰岛素输送(AID)系统的数量正在增加,糖尿病(PwD)患者越来越频繁地替代传感器增强泵(SAP)治疗。本研究是我们之前在2019年至2021年间进行的单中心回顾性分析的两年随访,比较了SAP和开源AID系统在1型糖尿病患者中的应用。这项第二年的分析包括25名PwD患者,并根据动态葡萄糖谱(AGP)调查血糖变化。与第一年相比,平均血糖(125.4 ~ 135.2 mg/dl, P = 0.038)、在范围内的时间(TIR, 84.2 ~ 77.0%, P = 0.012)、在范围内的时间(TAR, 11.6% ~ 18.5%, P = 0.017)和血糖危险指数(GRI, 24.8 ~ 35.0%, P = 0.026)均有所恶化。AID患者在第一年平均血糖和葡萄糖变异性的降低是由于高血糖时间的显著减少,从而导致更高的TIR和更低的GRI。在第二年的随访中,TIR和GRI表现出明显的恶化,这是糖尿病患者常见的现象。然而,开源AID系统显示出持续的安全性,因为即使在两年后,TBR也没有增加。尽管血糖参数略有恶化,但开源AID系统能够根据国际共识指南证明足够的血糖控制,同时提供减轻糖尿病管理负担的特征益处。对不同AID算法的描述性比较表明,通过更先进的功能,如基础速率修改、自动丸功能和自动调谐,改善了血糖控制。
Changes in ambulatory glucose profile in people with type 1 diabetes using an automated insulin delivery system - two year follow-up retrospective analysis of real-world data
The number of available automated insulin delivery (AID) systems is increasing in Austria and people with diabetes (PwD) replace sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy more and more frequently. The present study is the two years follow-up of our prior monocentric, retrospective analysis conducted between 2019 and 2021, comparing SAP and open-source AID systems in people with type 1 diabetes. This second-year analysis included 25 PwD and investigated glycemic changes based on ambulatory glucose profiles (AGP). In comparison to the first year, a worsening of mean glucose (125.4 to 135.2 mg/dl, P = 0.038), time in range ((TIR), 84.2 to 77.0%, P = 0.012), time above range ((TAR), 11.6% to 18.5%, P = 0.017) and glycemia risk index ((GRI), 24.8 to 35.0%, P = 0.026) was observed. The reduction of mean glucose and glucose variability with AID in the first year was due to a significant decrease in time in hyperglycemia with resulting higher TIR and lower GRI. In this second-year follow up, TIR and GRI showed a significant deterioration, a familiar phenomenon in diabetology. However, open-source AID systems showed continuous safety, as there was no increase in time below range (TBR) even after two years. Despite the slight deterioration in the glycemic parameters, open-source AID systems were able to demonstrate sufficient glycemic control according to international consensus guidelines while offering the characteristic benefits of a reduced burden of diabetes management. A descriptive comparison of different AID algorithms indicated an improved glycemic control with more advanced features such as basal rate modification, auto bolus function and autotuning.