学校管理者与教师上下级影响策略与组织公平的关系

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Saadet Kuru Cetín, Sakir Cinkir
{"title":"学校管理者与教师上下级影响策略与组织公平的关系","authors":"Saadet Kuru Cetín, Sakir Cinkir","doi":"10.17583/ijelm.2018.3359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this study, it was aimed to determine how the secondary school administrators and teachers influence each other and their perceptions towards the types of organizational justice. It was also tested whether the types of organizational justice predict the organizational influence strategies or not. The data was collected from 284 school administrators and 854 teachers. According to the results of the study, while teachers highly use friendliness, bargaining and assertiveness tactics to influence their managers, they use higher authority and coalition tactics at moderate level. The teachers use reasoning tactics the least. On the other hand, school administrators use friendliness, bargaining and coalition tactics highly, higher authority and sanction tactics at moderate level and reasoning tactics the least. The results also showed that among the types of organizational justice the distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice predicts the organizational influence strategies of the teachers and the school administrators the best.","PeriodicalId":41651,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relation between School Managers and Teachers Downward and Upward Influence Tactis and Organizational Justice\",\"authors\":\"Saadet Kuru Cetín, Sakir Cinkir\",\"doi\":\"10.17583/ijelm.2018.3359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this study, it was aimed to determine how the secondary school administrators and teachers influence each other and their perceptions towards the types of organizational justice. It was also tested whether the types of organizational justice predict the organizational influence strategies or not. The data was collected from 284 school administrators and 854 teachers. According to the results of the study, while teachers highly use friendliness, bargaining and assertiveness tactics to influence their managers, they use higher authority and coalition tactics at moderate level. The teachers use reasoning tactics the least. On the other hand, school administrators use friendliness, bargaining and coalition tactics highly, higher authority and sanction tactics at moderate level and reasoning tactics the least. The results also showed that among the types of organizational justice the distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice predicts the organizational influence strategies of the teachers and the school administrators the best.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2018.3359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/ijelm.2018.3359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在本研究中,旨在确定中学管理者和教师如何相互影响,以及他们对组织正义类型的看法。还测试了组织公正的类型是否能预测组织影响力策略。这些数据来自284名学校管理人员和854名教师。根据研究结果,虽然教师高度使用友好、讨价还价和自信策略来影响他们的管理者,但他们在中等水平上使用更高的权威和联盟策略。教师使用推理策略最少。另一方面,学校管理者使用友好、讨价还价和联盟策略的程度较高,使用较高权力和制裁策略的程度较低,使用推理策略的程度最低。结果还表明,在组织公平类型中,分配公平、程序公平和互动公平对教师和学校管理者的组织影响策略的预测效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relation between School Managers and Teachers Downward and Upward Influence Tactis and Organizational Justice
Abstract In this study, it was aimed to determine how the secondary school administrators and teachers influence each other and their perceptions towards the types of organizational justice. It was also tested whether the types of organizational justice predict the organizational influence strategies or not. The data was collected from 284 school administrators and 854 teachers. According to the results of the study, while teachers highly use friendliness, bargaining and assertiveness tactics to influence their managers, they use higher authority and coalition tactics at moderate level. The teachers use reasoning tactics the least. On the other hand, school administrators use friendliness, bargaining and coalition tactics highly, higher authority and sanction tactics at moderate level and reasoning tactics the least. The results also showed that among the types of organizational justice the distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice predicts the organizational influence strategies of the teachers and the school administrators the best.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信