促进神经多样性,而不延续刻板印象或忽视神经发育障碍的复杂性

IF 11.5 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Matthew I. Brown, Heidi R Fisher
{"title":"促进神经多样性,而不延续刻板印象或忽视神经发育障碍的复杂性","authors":"Matthew I. Brown, Heidi R Fisher","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are highly concerned with the way in which LeFevre-Levy et al. (2023) characterize neurodiversity and neurodevelopmental disorders like autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and dyslexia in their focal article. In our opinion, the focal article is overly concerned with neurodiversity as a source of gifted outliers among the neuroatypical population. This framing perpetuates stereotypes of neuroatypical individuals that over-emphasize claims of narrowly defined strengths associated with specific conditions (e.g., greater visuospatial ability among individuals with ASD). Not only are these conditions more complex and interrelated than characterized in the focal article, but the article also fails to fully acknowledge the serious challenges that these conditions pose for most neuroatypical individuals. We value the goal of increasing neurodiversity in the workplace but contend that this cannot truly be achieved without an accurate understanding of neurodevelopmental disorders and the diversity of challenges faced by many neuroatypical individuals.","PeriodicalId":47771,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","volume":"16 1","pages":"36 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting neurodiversity without perpetuating stereotypes or overlooking the complexity of neurodevelopmental disorders\",\"authors\":\"Matthew I. Brown, Heidi R Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/iop.2022.97\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are highly concerned with the way in which LeFevre-Levy et al. (2023) characterize neurodiversity and neurodevelopmental disorders like autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and dyslexia in their focal article. In our opinion, the focal article is overly concerned with neurodiversity as a source of gifted outliers among the neuroatypical population. This framing perpetuates stereotypes of neuroatypical individuals that over-emphasize claims of narrowly defined strengths associated with specific conditions (e.g., greater visuospatial ability among individuals with ASD). Not only are these conditions more complex and interrelated than characterized in the focal article, but the article also fails to fully acknowledge the serious challenges that these conditions pose for most neuroatypical individuals. We value the goal of increasing neurodiversity in the workplace but contend that this cannot truly be achieved without an accurate understanding of neurodevelopmental disorders and the diversity of challenges faced by many neuroatypical individuals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"36 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.97\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.97","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们高度关注LeFevre-Levy等人(2023)在其重点文章中描述神经多样性和神经发育障碍(如自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)和阅读障碍)的方式。在我们看来,焦点文章过分关注神经多样性作为神经非典型人群中天才异常值的来源。这种框架延续了对神经非典型个体的刻板印象,过度强调与特定条件相关的狭义优势(例如,ASD患者的视觉空间能力更强)。这些情况不仅比重点文章所描述的更加复杂和相互关联,而且文章也没有充分认识到这些情况对大多数神经非典型个体构成的严重挑战。我们重视在工作场所增加神经多样性的目标,但认为如果没有对神经发育障碍和许多神经非典型个体所面临的挑战多样性的准确理解,这一目标就无法真正实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promoting neurodiversity without perpetuating stereotypes or overlooking the complexity of neurodevelopmental disorders
We are highly concerned with the way in which LeFevre-Levy et al. (2023) characterize neurodiversity and neurodevelopmental disorders like autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and dyslexia in their focal article. In our opinion, the focal article is overly concerned with neurodiversity as a source of gifted outliers among the neuroatypical population. This framing perpetuates stereotypes of neuroatypical individuals that over-emphasize claims of narrowly defined strengths associated with specific conditions (e.g., greater visuospatial ability among individuals with ASD). Not only are these conditions more complex and interrelated than characterized in the focal article, but the article also fails to fully acknowledge the serious challenges that these conditions pose for most neuroatypical individuals. We value the goal of increasing neurodiversity in the workplace but contend that this cannot truly be achieved without an accurate understanding of neurodevelopmental disorders and the diversity of challenges faced by many neuroatypical individuals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
10.10%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Industrial and Organizational Psychology-Perspectives on Science and Practice is a peer-reviewed academic journal published on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. The journal focuses on interactive exchanges on topics of importance to the science and practice of the field. It features articles that present new ideas or different takes on existing ideas, stimulating dialogue about important issues in the field. Additionally, the journal is indexed and abstracted in Clarivate Analytics SSCI, Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS), ProQuest, PsycINFO, and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信