基于IPMA的PBL班级事前评价因素分析

Mincheol Kim
{"title":"基于IPMA的PBL班级事前评价因素分析","authors":"Mincheol Kim","doi":"10.24313/jpbl.2022.00185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study examines how students value each of the factors represented in a matrix reflecting the following importance-performance matrix analysis (IPMA). This IPMA was used as the primary survey (Kim, 2019), and each evaluation factor, the average value of the latent variable, and the estimated path coefficient were used Methods: SmartPLS 3.0 was used for the numerical calculations and SPSS 19.0 was used to create the graph. Analysis occurs prior to student participation in the class to form a consensus among students at the beginning of the semester. Results: Attempts are made to derive the analysis results and apply them to actual problem-based learning classes to improve class evaluation through feedback. The results show that prioritizing the evaluation factors such as learning outcomes and self-directed learning is meaningful in terms of lecture efficiency. Conclusion: This approach is particularly meaningful, as it attempts an integrated model (im-portance-performance matrix-analytical hierarchy process) and is a continuation of a previous study (Kim, 2019)","PeriodicalId":32777,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ProblemBased Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis on Factors for Prior Evaluation of PBL Class Using IPMA\",\"authors\":\"Mincheol Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.24313/jpbl.2022.00185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study examines how students value each of the factors represented in a matrix reflecting the following importance-performance matrix analysis (IPMA). This IPMA was used as the primary survey (Kim, 2019), and each evaluation factor, the average value of the latent variable, and the estimated path coefficient were used Methods: SmartPLS 3.0 was used for the numerical calculations and SPSS 19.0 was used to create the graph. Analysis occurs prior to student participation in the class to form a consensus among students at the beginning of the semester. Results: Attempts are made to derive the analysis results and apply them to actual problem-based learning classes to improve class evaluation through feedback. The results show that prioritizing the evaluation factors such as learning outcomes and self-directed learning is meaningful in terms of lecture efficiency. Conclusion: This approach is particularly meaningful, as it attempts an integrated model (im-portance-performance matrix-analytical hierarchy process) and is a continuation of a previous study (Kim, 2019)\",\"PeriodicalId\":32777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of ProblemBased Learning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of ProblemBased Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24313/jpbl.2022.00185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ProblemBased Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24313/jpbl.2022.00185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察学生如何评价反映以下重要性-绩效矩阵分析(IPMA)的矩阵中所代表的每个因素。采用该IPMA作为主要调查(Kim, 2019),并使用每个评价因子、潜在变量的平均值和估计的路径系数。方法:使用SmartPLS 3.0进行数值计算,使用SPSS 19.0制作图表。在学生参与课堂之前进行分析,以便在学期开始时在学生中形成共识。结果:尝试推导出分析结果,并将其应用到实际的问题型学习课堂中,通过反馈提高课堂评价。结果表明,优先考虑学习成果和自主学习等评价因素对课堂效率有重要意义。结论:这种方法特别有意义,因为它尝试了一个集成模型(重要性-重要性-绩效矩阵-分析层次过程),并且是先前研究的延续(Kim, 2019)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis on Factors for Prior Evaluation of PBL Class Using IPMA
Purpose: This study examines how students value each of the factors represented in a matrix reflecting the following importance-performance matrix analysis (IPMA). This IPMA was used as the primary survey (Kim, 2019), and each evaluation factor, the average value of the latent variable, and the estimated path coefficient were used Methods: SmartPLS 3.0 was used for the numerical calculations and SPSS 19.0 was used to create the graph. Analysis occurs prior to student participation in the class to form a consensus among students at the beginning of the semester. Results: Attempts are made to derive the analysis results and apply them to actual problem-based learning classes to improve class evaluation through feedback. The results show that prioritizing the evaluation factors such as learning outcomes and self-directed learning is meaningful in terms of lecture efficiency. Conclusion: This approach is particularly meaningful, as it attempts an integrated model (im-portance-performance matrix-analytical hierarchy process) and is a continuation of a previous study (Kim, 2019)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信