检视教师教育研究方法论:实践、优先顺序与政治

IF 1.4 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Margaret Kettle, S. Heimans, G. Biesta, Keita Takayama
{"title":"检视教师教育研究方法论:实践、优先顺序与政治","authors":"Margaret Kettle, S. Heimans, G. Biesta, Keita Takayama","doi":"10.1080/1359866X.2021.1928955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The papers are randomly assigned in such a way that they are the next “cabs” off the rank for publication in APJTE. Our intent is to examine them in terms of the methodological practices and priorities they present for teacher education research and to launch off them into questions about what counts methodologically in the field. Of interest are research sites and participant profiles, conceptualisations of research problems and significance, research designs, including methods of data-collection and analysis and interpretation, and findings and contributions to the field. These considerations are integral to research method courses that will be familiar to many readers and form foundational methodological knowledge and skills. That being said, and in line with our Challenge #3 above, we invite consideration of these foundational principles, practices and priorities in current teacher education research as well as engagement with the politics of research, that is, critical recognition of the norms and expectations embedded in current practice. Such critical awareness helps us to generate critique and transformation of existing practices; it also enables openness to “other” ways of engaging in and with research, including ethically and culturally appropriate ways of knowing, doing and being that transcend Global South/North distinctions. In so doing, the possibility for methodological plurality in teacher education research is enhanced. In this issue, we examine seven papers for what they tell us about current methodological practices and priorities in teacher education research. Rather than the papers being presented individually, we synthesise the features that provide insights into what currently counts in teacher education research; indeed, we might see these features as methodological touchstones and reference points for researchers embarking on projects to advance knowledge, understandings and skills in teacher education in the future. The papers are as follows:","PeriodicalId":47276,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"245 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1928955","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining teacher education research methodology: practices, priorities and politics\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Kettle, S. Heimans, G. Biesta, Keita Takayama\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359866X.2021.1928955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The papers are randomly assigned in such a way that they are the next “cabs” off the rank for publication in APJTE. Our intent is to examine them in terms of the methodological practices and priorities they present for teacher education research and to launch off them into questions about what counts methodologically in the field. Of interest are research sites and participant profiles, conceptualisations of research problems and significance, research designs, including methods of data-collection and analysis and interpretation, and findings and contributions to the field. These considerations are integral to research method courses that will be familiar to many readers and form foundational methodological knowledge and skills. That being said, and in line with our Challenge #3 above, we invite consideration of these foundational principles, practices and priorities in current teacher education research as well as engagement with the politics of research, that is, critical recognition of the norms and expectations embedded in current practice. Such critical awareness helps us to generate critique and transformation of existing practices; it also enables openness to “other” ways of engaging in and with research, including ethically and culturally appropriate ways of knowing, doing and being that transcend Global South/North distinctions. In so doing, the possibility for methodological plurality in teacher education research is enhanced. In this issue, we examine seven papers for what they tell us about current methodological practices and priorities in teacher education research. Rather than the papers being presented individually, we synthesise the features that provide insights into what currently counts in teacher education research; indeed, we might see these features as methodological touchstones and reference points for researchers embarking on projects to advance knowledge, understandings and skills in teacher education in the future. The papers are as follows:\",\"PeriodicalId\":47276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"245 - 248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1928955\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1928955\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2021.1928955","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这些论文是以这样一种方式随机分配的,即它们是下一个在APJTE发表的“出租车”。我们的目的是从方法论实践和它们为教师教育研究提出的优先事项的角度来研究它们,并将它们引入关于该领域方法论意义的问题中。感兴趣的是研究地点和参与者简介、研究问题和意义的概念、研究设计,包括数据收集、分析和解释的方法,以及研究结果和对该领域的贡献。这些考虑因素是许多读者熟悉的研究方法课程的组成部分,并形成基础的方法论知识和技能。话虽如此,根据我们上面的挑战#3,我们邀请考虑当前教师教育研究中的这些基本原则、实践和优先事项,以及参与研究政治,即对当前实践中嵌入的规范和期望的批判性认可。这种批判意识有助于我们对现有实践进行批判和改造;它还使人们能够以“其他”方式参与研究,包括在道德和文化上超越全球南/北差异的适当的认识、行为和存在方式。通过这样做,提高了教师教育研究方法论多元化的可能性。在本期中,我们研究了七篇论文,了解它们告诉我们当前教师教育研究的方法论实践和优先事项。我们不是单独发表论文,而是综合了一些特征,这些特征为当前教师教育研究提供了见解;事实上,我们可能会将这些特征视为方法论的试金石和参考点,供研究人员着手推进未来教师教育中的知识、理解和技能。文件如下:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examining teacher education research methodology: practices, priorities and politics
The papers are randomly assigned in such a way that they are the next “cabs” off the rank for publication in APJTE. Our intent is to examine them in terms of the methodological practices and priorities they present for teacher education research and to launch off them into questions about what counts methodologically in the field. Of interest are research sites and participant profiles, conceptualisations of research problems and significance, research designs, including methods of data-collection and analysis and interpretation, and findings and contributions to the field. These considerations are integral to research method courses that will be familiar to many readers and form foundational methodological knowledge and skills. That being said, and in line with our Challenge #3 above, we invite consideration of these foundational principles, practices and priorities in current teacher education research as well as engagement with the politics of research, that is, critical recognition of the norms and expectations embedded in current practice. Such critical awareness helps us to generate critique and transformation of existing practices; it also enables openness to “other” ways of engaging in and with research, including ethically and culturally appropriate ways of knowing, doing and being that transcend Global South/North distinctions. In so doing, the possibility for methodological plurality in teacher education research is enhanced. In this issue, we examine seven papers for what they tell us about current methodological practices and priorities in teacher education research. Rather than the papers being presented individually, we synthesise the features that provide insights into what currently counts in teacher education research; indeed, we might see these features as methodological touchstones and reference points for researchers embarking on projects to advance knowledge, understandings and skills in teacher education in the future. The papers are as follows:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education
Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: This journal promotes rigorous research that makes a significant contribution to advancing knowledge in teacher education across early childhood, primary, secondary, vocational education and training, and higher education. The journal editors invite for peer review theoretically informed papers - including, but not limited to, empirically grounded research - which focus on significant issues relevant to an international audience in regards to: Teacher education (including initial teacher education and ongoing professional education) of teachers internationally; The cultural, economic, political, social and/or technological dimensions and contexts of teacher education; Change, stability, reform and resistance in (and relating to) teacher education; Improving the quality and impact of research in teacher education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信