Bailing Lyu, Emily Grossnickle Peterson, Alexandra List
{"title":"使用幻灯片来评估学生从多种资源中学习的情况","authors":"Bailing Lyu, Emily Grossnickle Peterson, Alexandra List","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>PowerPoints are among the most commonly used, yet infrequently investigated, classroom assignments. This study examines the features of PowerPoints that students produce based on multiple resources and associates these features with the quality of students’ oral presentations and information use behaviors during PowerPoint production. The MD-TRACE Model (Rouet & Britt, 2011) and Mayer’s SOI framework (1996) were used as guiding frameworks in this study. Confirming results from prior work, students were found to most frequently select resources based on their non-epistemic source features (e.g., length, information readability). Additionally, students were found to include a variety of organizational features (e.g., descriptive titles, topographical indicators, like bullets) on their slides. However, students’ inclusion of such organizational features negatively predicted the number of elaborated, added, and audience-directed idea units included in their oral presentations. Conversely, students’ purposeful exclusion of resources from their PowerPoints positively predicted elaborations during oral presentation delivery, suggesting complex patterns in the relation between multiple resource use and the quality of students’ PowerPoint presentations. Qualitative analysis of extreme cases was used to further explore patterns in students’ PowerPoint production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102204"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using PowerPoints to assess students’ learning from multiple resources\",\"authors\":\"Bailing Lyu, Emily Grossnickle Peterson, Alexandra List\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>PowerPoints are among the most commonly used, yet infrequently investigated, classroom assignments. This study examines the features of PowerPoints that students produce based on multiple resources and associates these features with the quality of students’ oral presentations and information use behaviors during PowerPoint production. The MD-TRACE Model (Rouet & Britt, 2011) and Mayer’s SOI framework (1996) were used as guiding frameworks in this study. Confirming results from prior work, students were found to most frequently select resources based on their non-epistemic source features (e.g., length, information readability). Additionally, students were found to include a variety of organizational features (e.g., descriptive titles, topographical indicators, like bullets) on their slides. However, students’ inclusion of such organizational features negatively predicted the number of elaborated, added, and audience-directed idea units included in their oral presentations. Conversely, students’ purposeful exclusion of resources from their PowerPoints positively predicted elaborations during oral presentation delivery, suggesting complex patterns in the relation between multiple resource use and the quality of students’ PowerPoint presentations. Qualitative analysis of extreme cases was used to further explore patterns in students’ PowerPoint production.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X23000589\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X23000589","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using PowerPoints to assess students’ learning from multiple resources
PowerPoints are among the most commonly used, yet infrequently investigated, classroom assignments. This study examines the features of PowerPoints that students produce based on multiple resources and associates these features with the quality of students’ oral presentations and information use behaviors during PowerPoint production. The MD-TRACE Model (Rouet & Britt, 2011) and Mayer’s SOI framework (1996) were used as guiding frameworks in this study. Confirming results from prior work, students were found to most frequently select resources based on their non-epistemic source features (e.g., length, information readability). Additionally, students were found to include a variety of organizational features (e.g., descriptive titles, topographical indicators, like bullets) on their slides. However, students’ inclusion of such organizational features negatively predicted the number of elaborated, added, and audience-directed idea units included in their oral presentations. Conversely, students’ purposeful exclusion of resources from their PowerPoints positively predicted elaborations during oral presentation delivery, suggesting complex patterns in the relation between multiple resource use and the quality of students’ PowerPoint presentations. Qualitative analysis of extreme cases was used to further explore patterns in students’ PowerPoint production.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.