气管插管后刺激器引导神经阻滞用糖玛德逆转神经肌肉阻滞:有必要吗?

Q3 Medicine
M. Hung, Yi-ping Wang
{"title":"气管插管后刺激器引导神经阻滞用糖玛德逆转神经肌肉阻滞:有必要吗?","authors":"M. Hung, Yi-ping Wang","doi":"10.6859/aja.202206/PP.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Received: 28 September 2020; Received in revised form: 20 January 2022; Accepted: 1 March 2022. Corresponding Author: Ming-Hui Hung, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, No. 25, Ln. 442, Sec. 1, Jingguo Rd., North Dist., Hsinchu City 300195, Taiwan (hung.minghui@gmail.com). To the Editor, We read the article by Dr. Moriwaki et al. with great interest in a recent issue of the journal. To facilitate early recovery of neuromuscular function for stimulator-guided nerve blocks, the authors administered sugammadex 2 mg/kg 10 minutes after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg to obtain adequate responses from nerve stimulation. While their protocol is feasible and their results are satisfactory, we have concerns about the strategy. Sugammadex might be a game-changer in the practice of general anesthesia. It can reverse any depths of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade within minutes and notably without cholinergic adverse effects. Nonetheless, anesthesiologists should be reminded that any drug is poison without considering why (indication), when (timing), and how (dose). First, for patients who desired general anesthesia and peripheral nerve block for pain control, we argue that using a supraglottic airway device without muscle relaxant during moderate-to-deep sedation or general anesthesia is sufficient to perform stimulator-guided nerve block. Even for long-hour procedures requiring a definite airway, general anesthesia with tracheal intubation can be performed after peripheral nerve blocks (block-before-intubation strategy). Second, the optimal depth of neuromuscular block without interfering with the use of a stimulator to guide nerve blocks is controversial. We did not know the specific depth of neuromuscular blockade 10 minutes after they gave rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg from their article. However, we found that all patients made a full recovery of neuromuscular function 7 minutes after sugammadex 2 mg/kg with a train-offour (TOF) ratio above 0.9 as shown in Figure 2 of the article done by Moriwaki et al. Unsurprisingly, many patients (72%) presented coughing and movement during surgery, most likely resulting from inadequate neuromuscular blockade hereafter. Anesthesiologists should be reminded that recommended doses of sugammadex from the package insert are relatively high for rapid and full reversal within 2–3 minutes in life-threatening scenarios. An excessive dose of sugammadex is not binding any rocuronium in the body. An unnecessary dose of sugammadex is associated with increasing drug cost and the occurrence of bradycardia and hypersensitivity reactions. Re-obtaining neuromuscular blockade after a high dose of sugammadex is another concern because rocuronium is not an option for muscle relaxation in the following hours. Therefore, it may be considered that anesthesiologists gave a low dose of sugammadex with TOF monitor to a targeted depth of neuromuscular blockade in such cases, instead of full recovery of neuromuscular function, which requires further study. Although sugammadex has been on the market for over a decade, it has been available only in the United States and in Taiwan since the end of 2015. Most of our anesthesiologists are just getting familiar","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade by Sugammadex for Stimulator-Guided Nerve Blocks After Tracheal Intubation: Is It Necessary?\",\"authors\":\"M. Hung, Yi-ping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.6859/aja.202206/PP.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Received: 28 September 2020; Received in revised form: 20 January 2022; Accepted: 1 March 2022. Corresponding Author: Ming-Hui Hung, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, No. 25, Ln. 442, Sec. 1, Jingguo Rd., North Dist., Hsinchu City 300195, Taiwan (hung.minghui@gmail.com). To the Editor, We read the article by Dr. Moriwaki et al. with great interest in a recent issue of the journal. To facilitate early recovery of neuromuscular function for stimulator-guided nerve blocks, the authors administered sugammadex 2 mg/kg 10 minutes after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg to obtain adequate responses from nerve stimulation. While their protocol is feasible and their results are satisfactory, we have concerns about the strategy. Sugammadex might be a game-changer in the practice of general anesthesia. It can reverse any depths of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade within minutes and notably without cholinergic adverse effects. Nonetheless, anesthesiologists should be reminded that any drug is poison without considering why (indication), when (timing), and how (dose). First, for patients who desired general anesthesia and peripheral nerve block for pain control, we argue that using a supraglottic airway device without muscle relaxant during moderate-to-deep sedation or general anesthesia is sufficient to perform stimulator-guided nerve block. Even for long-hour procedures requiring a definite airway, general anesthesia with tracheal intubation can be performed after peripheral nerve blocks (block-before-intubation strategy). Second, the optimal depth of neuromuscular block without interfering with the use of a stimulator to guide nerve blocks is controversial. We did not know the specific depth of neuromuscular blockade 10 minutes after they gave rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg from their article. However, we found that all patients made a full recovery of neuromuscular function 7 minutes after sugammadex 2 mg/kg with a train-offour (TOF) ratio above 0.9 as shown in Figure 2 of the article done by Moriwaki et al. Unsurprisingly, many patients (72%) presented coughing and movement during surgery, most likely resulting from inadequate neuromuscular blockade hereafter. Anesthesiologists should be reminded that recommended doses of sugammadex from the package insert are relatively high for rapid and full reversal within 2–3 minutes in life-threatening scenarios. An excessive dose of sugammadex is not binding any rocuronium in the body. An unnecessary dose of sugammadex is associated with increasing drug cost and the occurrence of bradycardia and hypersensitivity reactions. Re-obtaining neuromuscular blockade after a high dose of sugammadex is another concern because rocuronium is not an option for muscle relaxation in the following hours. Therefore, it may be considered that anesthesiologists gave a low dose of sugammadex with TOF monitor to a targeted depth of neuromuscular blockade in such cases, instead of full recovery of neuromuscular function, which requires further study. Although sugammadex has been on the market for over a decade, it has been available only in the United States and in Taiwan since the end of 2015. Most of our anesthesiologists are just getting familiar\",\"PeriodicalId\":8482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202206/PP.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202206/PP.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

收稿日期:2020年9月28日;收到订正稿:2022年1月20日;录用日期:2022年3月1日。通讯作者:洪明辉,医学博士,台湾大学附属医院新竹分院麻醉科,新竹市北区经国路1段442号25号(hung.minghui@gmail.com)。致编辑:我们以极大的兴趣阅读了Moriwaki博士等人在最近一期杂志上发表的文章。为了促进刺激器引导的神经阻滞的神经肌肉功能的早期恢复,作者在罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg后10分钟给予糖马德2mg /kg,以获得足够的神经刺激反应。虽然他们的方案是可行的,结果是令人满意的,但我们对他们的策略表示担忧。Sugammadex可能会改变全身麻醉实践的游戏规则。它可以在几分钟内逆转任何深度的罗库溴铵引起的神经肌肉阻滞,特别是没有胆碱能不良反应。尽管如此,麻醉师应该被提醒,任何药物都是有毒的,而不需要考虑为什么(适应症)、何时(时机)和如何(剂量)。首先,对于需要全身麻醉和周围神经阻滞来控制疼痛的患者,我们认为在中至深度镇静或全身麻醉期间使用不含肌肉松弛剂的声门上气道装置足以进行刺激器引导的神经阻滞。即使对于长时间需要明确气道的手术,也可以在周围神经阻滞(插管前阻滞策略)后进行气管插管的全身麻醉。其次,在不干扰使用刺激器引导神经阻滞的情况下,神经肌肉阻滞的最佳深度是有争议的。我们不知道他们给罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg后10分钟神经肌肉阻滞的具体深度。然而,我们发现所有患者在服用糖胺酮2mg /kg后7分钟神经肌肉功能完全恢复,训练-四(TOF)比大于0.9,如Moriwaki等人的文章图2所示。不出所料,许多患者(72%)在手术中出现咳嗽和运动,很可能是由于此后神经肌肉阻断不足造成的。麻醉医师应注意,在危及生命的情况下,为了在2-3分钟内迅速完全逆转,包装说明书上推荐的sugammadex剂量相对较高。过量的糖madex不会与体内的罗库溴铵结合。不必要的糖madex剂量与药物成本增加以及心动过缓和过敏反应的发生有关。在高剂量糖马德后重新获得神经肌肉阻断是另一个问题,因为罗库溴铵在接下来的几个小时内不是肌肉放松的选择。因此,在这种情况下,可能认为麻醉师在TOF监测的情况下给予低剂量的sugammadex,达到了目标的神经肌肉阻断深度,而不是神经肌肉功能的完全恢复,这需要进一步的研究。虽然sugammadex已经上市十多年了,但从2015年底开始,它只在美国和台湾上市。我们大多数的麻醉师都是新手
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade by Sugammadex for Stimulator-Guided Nerve Blocks After Tracheal Intubation: Is It Necessary?
Received: 28 September 2020; Received in revised form: 20 January 2022; Accepted: 1 March 2022. Corresponding Author: Ming-Hui Hung, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, No. 25, Ln. 442, Sec. 1, Jingguo Rd., North Dist., Hsinchu City 300195, Taiwan (hung.minghui@gmail.com). To the Editor, We read the article by Dr. Moriwaki et al. with great interest in a recent issue of the journal. To facilitate early recovery of neuromuscular function for stimulator-guided nerve blocks, the authors administered sugammadex 2 mg/kg 10 minutes after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg to obtain adequate responses from nerve stimulation. While their protocol is feasible and their results are satisfactory, we have concerns about the strategy. Sugammadex might be a game-changer in the practice of general anesthesia. It can reverse any depths of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade within minutes and notably without cholinergic adverse effects. Nonetheless, anesthesiologists should be reminded that any drug is poison without considering why (indication), when (timing), and how (dose). First, for patients who desired general anesthesia and peripheral nerve block for pain control, we argue that using a supraglottic airway device without muscle relaxant during moderate-to-deep sedation or general anesthesia is sufficient to perform stimulator-guided nerve block. Even for long-hour procedures requiring a definite airway, general anesthesia with tracheal intubation can be performed after peripheral nerve blocks (block-before-intubation strategy). Second, the optimal depth of neuromuscular block without interfering with the use of a stimulator to guide nerve blocks is controversial. We did not know the specific depth of neuromuscular blockade 10 minutes after they gave rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg from their article. However, we found that all patients made a full recovery of neuromuscular function 7 minutes after sugammadex 2 mg/kg with a train-offour (TOF) ratio above 0.9 as shown in Figure 2 of the article done by Moriwaki et al. Unsurprisingly, many patients (72%) presented coughing and movement during surgery, most likely resulting from inadequate neuromuscular blockade hereafter. Anesthesiologists should be reminded that recommended doses of sugammadex from the package insert are relatively high for rapid and full reversal within 2–3 minutes in life-threatening scenarios. An excessive dose of sugammadex is not binding any rocuronium in the body. An unnecessary dose of sugammadex is associated with increasing drug cost and the occurrence of bradycardia and hypersensitivity reactions. Re-obtaining neuromuscular blockade after a high dose of sugammadex is another concern because rocuronium is not an option for muscle relaxation in the following hours. Therefore, it may be considered that anesthesiologists gave a low dose of sugammadex with TOF monitor to a targeted depth of neuromuscular blockade in such cases, instead of full recovery of neuromuscular function, which requires further study. Although sugammadex has been on the market for over a decade, it has been available only in the United States and in Taiwan since the end of 2015. Most of our anesthesiologists are just getting familiar
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of anesthesiology
Asian journal of anesthesiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信