神经肌型验证:评估5q脊髓肌萎缩患者的智能键盘

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
P. Lizandra Cortés , D. Poveda Verdú , A. Albert Férriz , N.C. Ñungo-Garzón , M.C. Domine , T. Sevilla-Mantecón , I. Pitarch-Castellano , J.F. Vázquez-Costa
{"title":"神经肌型验证:评估5q脊髓肌萎缩患者的智能键盘","authors":"P. Lizandra Cortés ,&nbsp;D. Poveda Verdú ,&nbsp;A. Albert Férriz ,&nbsp;N.C. Ñungo-Garzón ,&nbsp;M.C. Domine ,&nbsp;T. Sevilla-Mantecón ,&nbsp;I. Pitarch-Castellano ,&nbsp;J.F. Vázquez-Costa","doi":"10.1016/j.nrl.2022.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Spinal muscular atrophy 5q (SMA) is a genetic neurodegenerative disease that affects alpha motor neurons producing progressive weakness. New outcome measures are currently required to accurately characterize the disease progression and the efficacy of new available treatments. The objective of this work is to preliminarily validate a new intelligent keyboard (Neuromyotype) measuring typing strength and speed in patients with SMA.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Twenty two SMA patients older than 15<!--> <!-->years, and 26 healthy controls were included. Three measurements were obtained with the keyboard (maximum strength, execution time of a random typing task, execution time of a sequential typing task) together with the time to complete the Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). Patients were also administered motor (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded [HFMSE], Revised Upper Limb Module [RULM]), and functional scales (Egen Klassification [EK2] and the revised version of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale [ALSFRS-R]). The viability and construct validity of the Neuromyotype were analyzed, measuring the discriminative power between patients and controls (using ROC curves and the Bangdiwala statistic), between the different functional types of SMA (walker, sitter and non-sitter) and their correlation with the rest of motor scales.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Neuromyotype measurements could be performed in all patients, unlike the rest of the scales. Its administration was quick and easy. The 3 variables on the keyboard discriminated very well between patients and controls, with strength (ROC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.963) being the one that best differentiates from the 3, equaling 9HPT (ROC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.966). They also showed a good ability to differentiate by functional type (especially non-sitters from sitters and walkers), with sequential time (B<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.83) being the tool that best discriminates between the three groups above the rest of motor scales. All motor and functional scales showed strong or very strong correlations with each other (rs<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.71-0.99), with strength correlating better with motor scales and timed variables with functional scales.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study shows the feasibility and validity of Neuromyotype for the evaluation of adolescent and adult patients with SMA. Data obtained with this tool could be of great clinical relevance, saving time and resources compared to the rest of the scales.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19300,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"39 9","pages":"Pages 733-742"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validación de Neuromyotype: un teclado inteligente para la evaluación de pacientes con atrofia muscular espinal 5q\",\"authors\":\"P. Lizandra Cortés ,&nbsp;D. Poveda Verdú ,&nbsp;A. Albert Férriz ,&nbsp;N.C. Ñungo-Garzón ,&nbsp;M.C. Domine ,&nbsp;T. Sevilla-Mantecón ,&nbsp;I. Pitarch-Castellano ,&nbsp;J.F. Vázquez-Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nrl.2022.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Spinal muscular atrophy 5q (SMA) is a genetic neurodegenerative disease that affects alpha motor neurons producing progressive weakness. New outcome measures are currently required to accurately characterize the disease progression and the efficacy of new available treatments. The objective of this work is to preliminarily validate a new intelligent keyboard (Neuromyotype) measuring typing strength and speed in patients with SMA.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Twenty two SMA patients older than 15<!--> <!-->years, and 26 healthy controls were included. Three measurements were obtained with the keyboard (maximum strength, execution time of a random typing task, execution time of a sequential typing task) together with the time to complete the Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). Patients were also administered motor (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded [HFMSE], Revised Upper Limb Module [RULM]), and functional scales (Egen Klassification [EK2] and the revised version of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale [ALSFRS-R]). The viability and construct validity of the Neuromyotype were analyzed, measuring the discriminative power between patients and controls (using ROC curves and the Bangdiwala statistic), between the different functional types of SMA (walker, sitter and non-sitter) and their correlation with the rest of motor scales.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Neuromyotype measurements could be performed in all patients, unlike the rest of the scales. Its administration was quick and easy. The 3 variables on the keyboard discriminated very well between patients and controls, with strength (ROC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.963) being the one that best differentiates from the 3, equaling 9HPT (ROC<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.966). They also showed a good ability to differentiate by functional type (especially non-sitters from sitters and walkers), with sequential time (B<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.83) being the tool that best discriminates between the three groups above the rest of motor scales. All motor and functional scales showed strong or very strong correlations with each other (rs<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.71-0.99), with strength correlating better with motor scales and timed variables with functional scales.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study shows the feasibility and validity of Neuromyotype for the evaluation of adolescent and adult patients with SMA. Data obtained with this tool could be of great clinical relevance, saving time and resources compared to the rest of the scales.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia\",\"volume\":\"39 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 733-742\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213485322000809\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213485322000809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言5q脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)是一种遗传性神经退行性疾病,会影响α运动神经元,产生进行性乏力。目前需要新的结果测量方法来准确描述疾病的进展和现有新疗法的疗效。这项工作的目的是初步验证测量 SMA 患者打字力度和速度的新型智能键盘(Neuromyotype)。使用键盘进行了三项测量(最大力度、执行随机打字任务的时间、执行连续打字任务的时间),同时还测量了完成九孔钉测试(9HPT)的时间。此外,还对患者进行了运动量表(哈默史密斯功能运动量表扩展版[HFMSE]、修订版上肢模块[RULM])和功能量表(Egen Klassification [EK2]和修订版肌萎缩侧索硬化症功能评定量表[ALSFRS-R])的测试。我们分析了神经肌肉型的可行性和结构效度,测量了患者和对照组之间的鉴别力(使用 ROC 曲线和 Bangdiwala 统计量)、SMA 不同功能类型(步行者、坐位者和非坐位者)之间的鉴别力及其与其他运动量表的相关性。其操作简单快捷。键盘上的 3 个变量能很好地区分患者和对照组,其中力量(ROC = 0.963)与 9HPT (ROC = 0.966)的区别最大。这些量表在区分功能类型(尤其是非坐位者与坐位者和步行者)方面也显示出良好的能力,其中顺序时间(B = 0.83)是区分三组的最佳工具,高于其他运动量表。所有运动量表和功能量表之间都显示出很强或非常强的相关性(rs = 0.71-0.99),其中力量与运动量表的相关性更好,而计时变量与功能量表的相关性更好。与其他量表相比,使用该工具获得的数据可节省时间和资源,具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validación de Neuromyotype: un teclado inteligente para la evaluación de pacientes con atrofia muscular espinal 5q

Introduction

Spinal muscular atrophy 5q (SMA) is a genetic neurodegenerative disease that affects alpha motor neurons producing progressive weakness. New outcome measures are currently required to accurately characterize the disease progression and the efficacy of new available treatments. The objective of this work is to preliminarily validate a new intelligent keyboard (Neuromyotype) measuring typing strength and speed in patients with SMA.

Material and methods

Twenty two SMA patients older than 15 years, and 26 healthy controls were included. Three measurements were obtained with the keyboard (maximum strength, execution time of a random typing task, execution time of a sequential typing task) together with the time to complete the Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). Patients were also administered motor (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded [HFMSE], Revised Upper Limb Module [RULM]), and functional scales (Egen Klassification [EK2] and the revised version of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale [ALSFRS-R]). The viability and construct validity of the Neuromyotype were analyzed, measuring the discriminative power between patients and controls (using ROC curves and the Bangdiwala statistic), between the different functional types of SMA (walker, sitter and non-sitter) and their correlation with the rest of motor scales.

Results

Neuromyotype measurements could be performed in all patients, unlike the rest of the scales. Its administration was quick and easy. The 3 variables on the keyboard discriminated very well between patients and controls, with strength (ROC = 0.963) being the one that best differentiates from the 3, equaling 9HPT (ROC = 0.966). They also showed a good ability to differentiate by functional type (especially non-sitters from sitters and walkers), with sequential time (B = 0.83) being the tool that best discriminates between the three groups above the rest of motor scales. All motor and functional scales showed strong or very strong correlations with each other (rs = 0.71-0.99), with strength correlating better with motor scales and timed variables with functional scales.

Conclusion

This study shows the feasibility and validity of Neuromyotype for the evaluation of adolescent and adult patients with SMA. Data obtained with this tool could be of great clinical relevance, saving time and resources compared to the rest of the scales.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia
Neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
135
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Neurología es la revista oficial de la Sociedad Española de Neurología y publica, desde 1986 contribuciones científicas en el campo de la neurología clínica y experimental. Los contenidos de Neurología abarcan desde la neuroepidemiología, la clínica neurológica, la gestión y asistencia neurológica y la terapéutica, a la investigación básica en neurociencias aplicada a la neurología. Las áreas temáticas de la revistas incluyen la neurologia infantil, la neuropsicología, la neurorehabilitación y la neurogeriatría. Los artículos publicados en Neurología siguen un proceso de revisión por doble ciego a fin de que los trabajos sean seleccionados atendiendo a su calidad, originalidad e interés y así estén sometidos a un proceso de mejora. El formato de artículos incluye Editoriales, Originales, Revisiones y Cartas al Editor, Neurología es el vehículo de información científica de reconocida calidad en profesionales interesados en la neurología que utilizan el español, como demuestra su inclusión en los más prestigiosos y selectivos índices bibliográficos del mundo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信