{"title":"政党声誉与品牌管理:加拿大选举候选人的党内审查","authors":"Alex Marland, Brooks DeCillia","doi":"10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A political party is keen to jettison anyone who could plunge it into crisis, cost it votes, harm its reputation and damage its brand. Association with election candidates is particularly high risk because of the high stakes of an election campaign. As part of their reputation and brand management, party officials can screen aspiring candidates before local party members do so. Little is known about these pre-selection methods. We examine the lengthy, invasive screening questionnaires and secretive processes that Canadian political parties use to assess potential candidates. We show that parties probe for edgy remarks, controversial activities, intolerant attitudes and unlawful conduct. Vetting pays special attention to social media. We explain that the phenomenon responds to the growth of digital content, media interest in controversy and the turmoil sparked by opposition research. We then consider normative implications associated with media and democracy.","PeriodicalId":46735,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","volume":"32 1","pages":"342 - 363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reputation and Brand Management by Political Parties: Party Vetting of Election Candidates in Canada\",\"authors\":\"Alex Marland, Brooks DeCillia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT A political party is keen to jettison anyone who could plunge it into crisis, cost it votes, harm its reputation and damage its brand. Association with election candidates is particularly high risk because of the high stakes of an election campaign. As part of their reputation and brand management, party officials can screen aspiring candidates before local party members do so. Little is known about these pre-selection methods. We examine the lengthy, invasive screening questionnaires and secretive processes that Canadian political parties use to assess potential candidates. We show that parties probe for edgy remarks, controversial activities, intolerant attitudes and unlawful conduct. Vetting pays special attention to social media. We explain that the phenomenon responds to the growth of digital content, media interest in controversy and the turmoil sparked by opposition research. We then consider normative implications associated with media and democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"342 - 363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2020.1798857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reputation and Brand Management by Political Parties: Party Vetting of Election Candidates in Canada
ABSTRACT A political party is keen to jettison anyone who could plunge it into crisis, cost it votes, harm its reputation and damage its brand. Association with election candidates is particularly high risk because of the high stakes of an election campaign. As part of their reputation and brand management, party officials can screen aspiring candidates before local party members do so. Little is known about these pre-selection methods. We examine the lengthy, invasive screening questionnaires and secretive processes that Canadian political parties use to assess potential candidates. We show that parties probe for edgy remarks, controversial activities, intolerant attitudes and unlawful conduct. Vetting pays special attention to social media. We explain that the phenomenon responds to the growth of digital content, media interest in controversy and the turmoil sparked by opposition research. We then consider normative implications associated with media and democracy.