农业生态措施对奶牛瘤胃微生物群与甲烷排放的影响

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Simon Roques , Lisanne Koning , Johan van Riel , Alex Bossers , Dirkjan Schokker , Soumya Kanti Kar , Léon Sebek
{"title":"农业生态措施对奶牛瘤胃微生物群与甲烷排放的影响","authors":"Simon Roques ,&nbsp;Lisanne Koning ,&nbsp;Johan van Riel ,&nbsp;Alex Bossers ,&nbsp;Dirkjan Schokker ,&nbsp;Soumya Kanti Kar ,&nbsp;Léon Sebek","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Moving from intensive farming to agroecology to support farm sustainability means changing feeding practices. In practical terms, this means increasing the botanical diversity and delaying mowing of the grasslands to favor fauna diversity and associated ecosystem services. However, it is unknown whether these feeding practices alter rumen microbiota and its association with methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emission, a potent greenhouse gas. The objective of this study was to assess CH<sub>4</sub> emission and rumen microbiota of several dairy breeds fed agroecology diets. Three dairy cattle breeds (Holstein Friesian, Groninger Blaarkop and Jersey) (N = 10 for each breed) were fed three grass silage-based diets that included a proportion of a control silage, an experimental silage composed of late mown grass, and an experimental silage composed of diverse botanical species. Cows were fed for 13 weeks with gradual adjustment of the proportion of each silage. Rumen fluid was sampled during the weeks that corresponded to the highest proportion of each silage in the diet. Rumen microbiota was characterized through 16 s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing for its richness and diversity, as well as its compositions according to diet type and breed. Production performances and CH<sub>4</sub> emission were also measured. Methane production (g/d) was similar between the control and the agroecological diets. Cows fed the experimental diets had a different rumen microbiota composition than cows fed control diet. The cows fed the agroecological diets presented reduced relative abundances of <em>Rumminoccocaeae</em>, and higher relative abundances of <em>Chirstensenellaceae</em> and <em>Methanobrevibacter</em> than cows fed the control diet. Besides, the cows fed the agroecological diets presented a richer (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and more diverse (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) rumen microbiota. Overall, this study highlights how feeding practices that comply with agroecology principles, and applied under practical conditions, shaped the rumen microbiota of specialized and dual-purpose cattle breeds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"303 ","pages":"Article 115716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of agroecology practices on rumen microbiota associated with methane emission in dairy cattle\",\"authors\":\"Simon Roques ,&nbsp;Lisanne Koning ,&nbsp;Johan van Riel ,&nbsp;Alex Bossers ,&nbsp;Dirkjan Schokker ,&nbsp;Soumya Kanti Kar ,&nbsp;Léon Sebek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Moving from intensive farming to agroecology to support farm sustainability means changing feeding practices. In practical terms, this means increasing the botanical diversity and delaying mowing of the grasslands to favor fauna diversity and associated ecosystem services. However, it is unknown whether these feeding practices alter rumen microbiota and its association with methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emission, a potent greenhouse gas. The objective of this study was to assess CH<sub>4</sub> emission and rumen microbiota of several dairy breeds fed agroecology diets. Three dairy cattle breeds (Holstein Friesian, Groninger Blaarkop and Jersey) (N = 10 for each breed) were fed three grass silage-based diets that included a proportion of a control silage, an experimental silage composed of late mown grass, and an experimental silage composed of diverse botanical species. Cows were fed for 13 weeks with gradual adjustment of the proportion of each silage. Rumen fluid was sampled during the weeks that corresponded to the highest proportion of each silage in the diet. Rumen microbiota was characterized through 16 s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing for its richness and diversity, as well as its compositions according to diet type and breed. Production performances and CH<sub>4</sub> emission were also measured. Methane production (g/d) was similar between the control and the agroecological diets. Cows fed the experimental diets had a different rumen microbiota composition than cows fed control diet. The cows fed the agroecological diets presented reduced relative abundances of <em>Rumminoccocaeae</em>, and higher relative abundances of <em>Chirstensenellaceae</em> and <em>Methanobrevibacter</em> than cows fed the control diet. Besides, the cows fed the agroecological diets presented a richer (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and more diverse (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) rumen microbiota. Overall, this study highlights how feeding practices that comply with agroecology principles, and applied under practical conditions, shaped the rumen microbiota of specialized and dual-purpose cattle breeds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"303 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840123001505\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840123001505","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从集约化农业转向支持农业可持续性的生态农业,意味着改变饲养方式。实际上,这意味着增加植物多样性,推迟草原的刈割,以有利于动物多样性和相关的生态系统服务。然而,尚不清楚这些饲养方式是否会改变瘤胃微生物群及其与甲烷(CH4)排放的关系,甲烷是一种强效温室气体。本研究的目的是评估几种饲喂农业生态日粮的奶牛品种的甲烷排放和瘤胃微生物群。采用3个奶牛品种(Holstein Friesian、Groninger Blaarkop和Jersey)(每个品种N = 10)饲喂3种草青贮饲料,其中包括对照青贮、由晚割草组成的试验青贮和由多种植物物种组成的试验青贮。饲喂13周,逐步调整各种青贮饲料的比例。在饲粮中每种青贮料比例最高的周内取样瘤胃液。通过16s rRNA基因扩增子测序分析瘤胃微生物群的丰富度和多样性,以及不同饲粮类型和品种瘤胃微生物群的组成。测定了生产性能和CH4排放量。对照饲粮和生态农业饲粮的甲烷产量(g/d)相似。饲喂试验饲粮的奶牛瘤胃微生物群组成与饲喂对照饲粮的奶牛不同。饲喂农业生态饲粮的奶牛瘤胃菌科(rumminococcaeae)的相对丰度低于对照饲粮,而Chirstensenellaceae和甲烷菌(methanobrebacter)的相对丰度高于对照饲粮。此外,饲喂农业生态日粮的奶牛表现出更丰富的P <0.01)和更多样化(P <0.01)瘤胃微生物群。总体而言,本研究强调了符合农业生态学原则并在实际条件下应用的喂养实践如何塑造了专业和两用牛品种的瘤胃微生物群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of agroecology practices on rumen microbiota associated with methane emission in dairy cattle

Moving from intensive farming to agroecology to support farm sustainability means changing feeding practices. In practical terms, this means increasing the botanical diversity and delaying mowing of the grasslands to favor fauna diversity and associated ecosystem services. However, it is unknown whether these feeding practices alter rumen microbiota and its association with methane (CH4) emission, a potent greenhouse gas. The objective of this study was to assess CH4 emission and rumen microbiota of several dairy breeds fed agroecology diets. Three dairy cattle breeds (Holstein Friesian, Groninger Blaarkop and Jersey) (N = 10 for each breed) were fed three grass silage-based diets that included a proportion of a control silage, an experimental silage composed of late mown grass, and an experimental silage composed of diverse botanical species. Cows were fed for 13 weeks with gradual adjustment of the proportion of each silage. Rumen fluid was sampled during the weeks that corresponded to the highest proportion of each silage in the diet. Rumen microbiota was characterized through 16 s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing for its richness and diversity, as well as its compositions according to diet type and breed. Production performances and CH4 emission were also measured. Methane production (g/d) was similar between the control and the agroecological diets. Cows fed the experimental diets had a different rumen microbiota composition than cows fed control diet. The cows fed the agroecological diets presented reduced relative abundances of Rumminoccocaeae, and higher relative abundances of Chirstensenellaceae and Methanobrevibacter than cows fed the control diet. Besides, the cows fed the agroecological diets presented a richer (P < 0.01) and more diverse (P < 0.01) rumen microbiota. Overall, this study highlights how feeding practices that comply with agroecology principles, and applied under practical conditions, shaped the rumen microbiota of specialized and dual-purpose cattle breeds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信