编辑的介绍

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Jussi Backman, Harri Mäcklin, Raine Vasquez
{"title":"编辑的介绍","authors":"Jussi Backman, Harri Mäcklin, Raine Vasquez","doi":"10.1080/20539320.2017.1396695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2016, when we first began planning this special issue, eighty years had passed since Heidegger’s 1935–36 lectures on “The Origin of the Work of Art” momentously turned the philosophical attention from the beauty of art to its truth—to the process of truth “setting itself to work” in the work of art, now understood as the exposition of the conflictual interaction or “strife” between the meaningful configuration of a historical “world” and its material seat in the “earth.” In the course of those decades, the Western art world has undergone profound transformations. Very generally speaking, the visual arts have witnessed a passage from the peak of modernism in the interwar period, through post-war late modernist movements such as abstract expressionism and postmodernist tendencies such as pop art and conceptual art, to the polyvocal world of today described by labels such as post-postmodernism, metamodernism, contemporaneity, and post-contemporaneity. General trends such as the progressive experimentalism of modernism, the postmodern disillusionment with modernist utopias and the associated playful eclecticism and blurring of distinctions between “high” and “popular” cultural forms, as well as the various more recent reactions against the ironical nihilism of postmodernism, have also been reflected in literature and classical music. Traditional boundaries between different art forms and between art and non-art have become increasingly fluid as the arts interact ever more intensely with one another and with other modes of human culture, such as the media, popular culture, science, and technology. New artistic genres, practices, and theories—from bio art to Internet art, from virtual realities to posthumanism—pop up faster than one can keep track. These developments within the art scene echo wider cultural and societal transformations of the late twentieth century brought about by the postindustrial changes and globalization of developed consumer economies, digital technologies, and new mass and social media. Even if the physical and mental distances between people across the globe have shrunk with the emergence of unforeseen possibilities and intensities of communication, the accelerating flow of information, images, ideas, opinions, and innovations also contributes to an increasing fragmentation of the contemporary context, at least in Western and Westernized societies. The loss of credibility of grand metanarratives proclaimed by Jean-François Lyotard in his 1979 The Postmodern Condition and the proliferation of competing micronarratives appear to take us farther and farther from the kind of relatively stable cultural unities and historical continuities Heidegger still seems to presuppose in the mid-1930s as he reflects—without being immune to the nationalist fervor and totalitarian","PeriodicalId":41067,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology","volume":"4 1","pages":"93 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20539320.2017.1396695","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editors’ Introduction\",\"authors\":\"Jussi Backman, Harri Mäcklin, Raine Vasquez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20539320.2017.1396695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2016, when we first began planning this special issue, eighty years had passed since Heidegger’s 1935–36 lectures on “The Origin of the Work of Art” momentously turned the philosophical attention from the beauty of art to its truth—to the process of truth “setting itself to work” in the work of art, now understood as the exposition of the conflictual interaction or “strife” between the meaningful configuration of a historical “world” and its material seat in the “earth.” In the course of those decades, the Western art world has undergone profound transformations. Very generally speaking, the visual arts have witnessed a passage from the peak of modernism in the interwar period, through post-war late modernist movements such as abstract expressionism and postmodernist tendencies such as pop art and conceptual art, to the polyvocal world of today described by labels such as post-postmodernism, metamodernism, contemporaneity, and post-contemporaneity. General trends such as the progressive experimentalism of modernism, the postmodern disillusionment with modernist utopias and the associated playful eclecticism and blurring of distinctions between “high” and “popular” cultural forms, as well as the various more recent reactions against the ironical nihilism of postmodernism, have also been reflected in literature and classical music. Traditional boundaries between different art forms and between art and non-art have become increasingly fluid as the arts interact ever more intensely with one another and with other modes of human culture, such as the media, popular culture, science, and technology. New artistic genres, practices, and theories—from bio art to Internet art, from virtual realities to posthumanism—pop up faster than one can keep track. These developments within the art scene echo wider cultural and societal transformations of the late twentieth century brought about by the postindustrial changes and globalization of developed consumer economies, digital technologies, and new mass and social media. Even if the physical and mental distances between people across the globe have shrunk with the emergence of unforeseen possibilities and intensities of communication, the accelerating flow of information, images, ideas, opinions, and innovations also contributes to an increasing fragmentation of the contemporary context, at least in Western and Westernized societies. The loss of credibility of grand metanarratives proclaimed by Jean-François Lyotard in his 1979 The Postmodern Condition and the proliferation of competing micronarratives appear to take us farther and farther from the kind of relatively stable cultural unities and historical continuities Heidegger still seems to presuppose in the mid-1930s as he reflects—without being immune to the nationalist fervor and totalitarian\",\"PeriodicalId\":41067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"93 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20539320.2017.1396695\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20539320.2017.1396695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20539320.2017.1396695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016年,当我们第一次开始策划这期特刊时,距离海德格尔1935–36次关于“艺术作品的起源”的讲座,已经过去了80年,这场讲座将哲学的注意力从艺术之美瞬间转向了它的真理——转向了真理在艺术作品中“设身处地”的过程,现在被理解为对一个历史“世界”的有意义的配置与其在“地球”中的物质位置之间的冲突互动或“冲突”的阐述。在这几十年的过程中,西方艺术世界发生了深刻的转变。一般来说,视觉艺术经历了从两次世界大战时期现代主义的顶峰,到战后抽象表现主义等后现代主义运动,再到波普艺术和概念艺术等后现代倾向,再到后现代主义、超现代主义、当代性和后现代性等标签所描述的当今多元世界。一般趋势,如现代主义的进步实验主义、对现代主义乌托邦的后现代幻灭以及相关的嬉戏折衷主义和模糊“高级”和“流行”文化形式之间的区别,以及最近对后现代主义讽刺虚无主义的各种反应,也反映在文学和古典音乐中。随着艺术之间以及与其他人类文化模式(如媒体、流行文化、科学和技术)的互动越来越激烈,不同艺术形式之间以及艺术与非艺术之间的传统界限变得越来越不稳定。新的艺术流派、实践和理论——从生物艺术到互联网艺术,从虚拟现实到后人道主义——出现的速度之快超出了人们的预期。艺术领域的这些发展与20世纪末发达消费经济、数字技术以及新的大众和社交媒体的后工业变革和全球化所带来的更广泛的文化和社会变革相呼应。即使随着不可预见的可能性和交流强度的出现,全球人与人之间的身心距离已经缩小,但信息、图像、思想、观点和创新的加速流动也会导致当代环境的日益碎片化,至少在西方和西方社会是如此。让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔(Jean-François Lyotard)在1979年的《后现代条件》(The Postmodern Condition)中宣布的宏大元叙事的可信度丧失,以及相互竞争的微观叙事的扩散,似乎使我们离海德格尔在20世纪30年代中期所反思的那种相对稳定的文化统一和历史连续性越来越远——而不是免疫于民族主义狂热与极权主义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editors’ Introduction
In 2016, when we first began planning this special issue, eighty years had passed since Heidegger’s 1935–36 lectures on “The Origin of the Work of Art” momentously turned the philosophical attention from the beauty of art to its truth—to the process of truth “setting itself to work” in the work of art, now understood as the exposition of the conflictual interaction or “strife” between the meaningful configuration of a historical “world” and its material seat in the “earth.” In the course of those decades, the Western art world has undergone profound transformations. Very generally speaking, the visual arts have witnessed a passage from the peak of modernism in the interwar period, through post-war late modernist movements such as abstract expressionism and postmodernist tendencies such as pop art and conceptual art, to the polyvocal world of today described by labels such as post-postmodernism, metamodernism, contemporaneity, and post-contemporaneity. General trends such as the progressive experimentalism of modernism, the postmodern disillusionment with modernist utopias and the associated playful eclecticism and blurring of distinctions between “high” and “popular” cultural forms, as well as the various more recent reactions against the ironical nihilism of postmodernism, have also been reflected in literature and classical music. Traditional boundaries between different art forms and between art and non-art have become increasingly fluid as the arts interact ever more intensely with one another and with other modes of human culture, such as the media, popular culture, science, and technology. New artistic genres, practices, and theories—from bio art to Internet art, from virtual realities to posthumanism—pop up faster than one can keep track. These developments within the art scene echo wider cultural and societal transformations of the late twentieth century brought about by the postindustrial changes and globalization of developed consumer economies, digital technologies, and new mass and social media. Even if the physical and mental distances between people across the globe have shrunk with the emergence of unforeseen possibilities and intensities of communication, the accelerating flow of information, images, ideas, opinions, and innovations also contributes to an increasing fragmentation of the contemporary context, at least in Western and Westernized societies. The loss of credibility of grand metanarratives proclaimed by Jean-François Lyotard in his 1979 The Postmodern Condition and the proliferation of competing micronarratives appear to take us farther and farther from the kind of relatively stable cultural unities and historical continuities Heidegger still seems to presuppose in the mid-1930s as he reflects—without being immune to the nationalist fervor and totalitarian
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信