理解对碳税的抵制:普通公众和燃油税抗议者之间的驱动因素和障碍

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jens Ewald , Thomas Sterner , Erik Sterner
{"title":"理解对碳税的抵制:普通公众和燃油税抗议者之间的驱动因素和障碍","authors":"Jens Ewald ,&nbsp;Thomas Sterner ,&nbsp;Erik Sterner","doi":"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon taxes are generally well accepted in countries with significant experience thereof but there is still public resistance to raising them. We study attitudes toward carbon taxation and other environmental policy instruments in Sweden. We survey a national sample of the population as well as members of a large political movement that protests fuel taxes. Our results show that the motivations in both groups are alike: educational level, rural versus urban domicile, political orientation, and especially trust in government correlate with opinions on carbon taxes; household income does not appear to matter. Lack of trust in government and lack of belief in the Pigouvian mechanism appear as especially important motivations for protesters’ opposition. We find support for revenue refunding, but greater support, in both groups, for earmarking for climate use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47952,"journal":{"name":"Resource and Energy Economics","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765522000483/pdfft?md5=d71635cf5ec93847235e02394a9a91e0&pid=1-s2.0-S0928765522000483-main.pdf","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the resistance to carbon taxes: Drivers and barriers among the general public and fuel-tax protesters\",\"authors\":\"Jens Ewald ,&nbsp;Thomas Sterner ,&nbsp;Erik Sterner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Carbon taxes are generally well accepted in countries with significant experience thereof but there is still public resistance to raising them. We study attitudes toward carbon taxation and other environmental policy instruments in Sweden. We survey a national sample of the population as well as members of a large political movement that protests fuel taxes. Our results show that the motivations in both groups are alike: educational level, rural versus urban domicile, political orientation, and especially trust in government correlate with opinions on carbon taxes; household income does not appear to matter. Lack of trust in government and lack of belief in the Pigouvian mechanism appear as especially important motivations for protesters’ opposition. We find support for revenue refunding, but greater support, in both groups, for earmarking for climate use.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resource and Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765522000483/pdfft?md5=d71635cf5ec93847235e02394a9a91e0&pid=1-s2.0-S0928765522000483-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resource and Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765522000483\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource and Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765522000483","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

碳税在具有丰富经验的国家普遍被接受,但公众仍反对提高碳税。我们研究了瑞典对碳税和其他环境政策工具的态度。我们调查了全国人口样本以及抗议燃油税的大型政治运动的成员。我们的研究结果表明,两个群体的动机是相似的:教育水平、农村与城市住所、政治取向,尤其是对政府的信任与碳税的观点相关;家庭收入似乎并不重要。对政府缺乏信任和对庇古机制缺乏信仰似乎是抗议者反对的特别重要动机。我们发现对收入返还的支持,但在两个群体中,对专门用于气候用途的支持都更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the resistance to carbon taxes: Drivers and barriers among the general public and fuel-tax protesters

Carbon taxes are generally well accepted in countries with significant experience thereof but there is still public resistance to raising them. We study attitudes toward carbon taxation and other environmental policy instruments in Sweden. We survey a national sample of the population as well as members of a large political movement that protests fuel taxes. Our results show that the motivations in both groups are alike: educational level, rural versus urban domicile, political orientation, and especially trust in government correlate with opinions on carbon taxes; household income does not appear to matter. Lack of trust in government and lack of belief in the Pigouvian mechanism appear as especially important motivations for protesters’ opposition. We find support for revenue refunding, but greater support, in both groups, for earmarking for climate use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Resource and Energy Economics provides a forum for high level economic analysis of utilization and development of the earth natural resources. The subject matter encompasses questions of optimal production and consumption affecting energy, minerals, land, air and water, and includes analysis of firm and industry behavior, environmental issues and public policies. Implications for both developed and developing countries are of concern. The journal publishes high quality papers for an international audience. Innovative energy, resource and environmental analyses, including theoretical models and empirical studies are appropriate for publication in Resource and Energy Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信