艾米·萨拉·卡罗尔的《ReMex:走向北美自由贸易协定时代的艺术史》

IF 0.2 2区 艺术学 0 ART
ARTMargins Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1162/artm_r_00295
Irmgard Emmelhainz
{"title":"艾米·萨拉·卡罗尔的《ReMex:走向北美自由贸易协定时代的艺术史》","authors":"Irmgard Emmelhainz","doi":"10.1162/artm_r_00295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Amy Sara Carroll's ReMex: Toward an Art History of the NAFTA Era interprets Mexico City-based, feminist, and border, or Chicano, art in and around the 1990s. Its premise is that aesthetics and politics “form a loop” in order to express what the author calls “Greater Mexico.” With this term, Carroll proposes that “Mexico” is no longer a territory but rather an imaginary that transcends its geographic borders. In her view, the denationalization brought about by the liberalization of markets led to a multicultural utopia best expressed in border art and art concerned with race and gender issues. In her account, aesthetic practice must serve as a direct weapon against “NAFTAfication” and colonial heteropatriarchy. Carroll draws an analogy between the selling out of the nation through the NAFTA treaty and the selling out of “post-Mexican” art to the global culture industry through the ambition of curators, cultural managers and artists who placed Mexico and Mexican contemporary art as key global art destinations by taking advantage of generous State sponsorship brought about by market liberalization. Any hint of cosmopolitism is suspicious and thus Carroll insists on “ReMexing” Mexico.","PeriodicalId":41203,"journal":{"name":"ARTMargins","volume":"10 1","pages":"105-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amy Sara Carroll's ReMex: Toward an Art History of the NAFTA Era\",\"authors\":\"Irmgard Emmelhainz\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/artm_r_00295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Amy Sara Carroll's ReMex: Toward an Art History of the NAFTA Era interprets Mexico City-based, feminist, and border, or Chicano, art in and around the 1990s. Its premise is that aesthetics and politics “form a loop” in order to express what the author calls “Greater Mexico.” With this term, Carroll proposes that “Mexico” is no longer a territory but rather an imaginary that transcends its geographic borders. In her view, the denationalization brought about by the liberalization of markets led to a multicultural utopia best expressed in border art and art concerned with race and gender issues. In her account, aesthetic practice must serve as a direct weapon against “NAFTAfication” and colonial heteropatriarchy. Carroll draws an analogy between the selling out of the nation through the NAFTA treaty and the selling out of “post-Mexican” art to the global culture industry through the ambition of curators, cultural managers and artists who placed Mexico and Mexican contemporary art as key global art destinations by taking advantage of generous State sponsorship brought about by market liberalization. Any hint of cosmopolitism is suspicious and thus Carroll insists on “ReMexing” Mexico.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARTMargins\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"105-117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARTMargins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/artm_r_00295\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARTMargins","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/artm_r_00295","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

艾米·萨拉·卡罗尔的《ReMex:走向北美自由贸易协定时代的艺术史》解释了20世纪90年代前后以墨西哥城为基础的、女权主义的、边境的或墨西哥裔美国人的艺术。它的前提是美学和政治“形成一个循环”,以表达作者所说的“大墨西哥”。卡罗尔用这个词提出,“墨西哥”不再是一个领土,而是一个超越地理边界的想象。在她看来,市场自由化带来的非国家化导致了一个多元文化的乌托邦,这在边界艺术和涉及种族和性别问题的艺术中得到了最好的表达。在她的叙述中,审美实践必须作为反对“naftification”和殖民式的异性父权制的直接武器。卡罗尔类比了通过北美自由贸易协定出卖国家和通过策展人、文化管理者和艺术家的野心向全球文化产业出卖“后墨西哥”艺术,他们利用市场自由化带来的慷慨的国家赞助,将墨西哥和墨西哥当代艺术作为全球主要艺术目的地。任何世界主义的暗示都是可疑的,因此卡罗尔坚持要“重新定义”墨西哥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amy Sara Carroll's ReMex: Toward an Art History of the NAFTA Era
Abstract Amy Sara Carroll's ReMex: Toward an Art History of the NAFTA Era interprets Mexico City-based, feminist, and border, or Chicano, art in and around the 1990s. Its premise is that aesthetics and politics “form a loop” in order to express what the author calls “Greater Mexico.” With this term, Carroll proposes that “Mexico” is no longer a territory but rather an imaginary that transcends its geographic borders. In her view, the denationalization brought about by the liberalization of markets led to a multicultural utopia best expressed in border art and art concerned with race and gender issues. In her account, aesthetic practice must serve as a direct weapon against “NAFTAfication” and colonial heteropatriarchy. Carroll draws an analogy between the selling out of the nation through the NAFTA treaty and the selling out of “post-Mexican” art to the global culture industry through the ambition of curators, cultural managers and artists who placed Mexico and Mexican contemporary art as key global art destinations by taking advantage of generous State sponsorship brought about by market liberalization. Any hint of cosmopolitism is suspicious and thus Carroll insists on “ReMexing” Mexico.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARTMargins
ARTMargins ART-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: ARTMargins publishes scholarly articles and essays about contemporary art, media, architecture, and critical theory. ARTMargins studies art practices and visual culture in the emerging global margins, from North Africa and the Middle East to the Americas, Eastern and Western Europe, Asia and Australasia. The journal acts as a forum for scholars, theoreticians, and critics from a variety of disciplines who are interested in art and politics in transitional countries and regions; postsocialism and neo-liberalism; postmodernism and postcolonialism, and their critiques; and the problem of global art and global art history and its methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信