{"title":"北日耳曼Jespersen周期早期否定标记语的语用分化","authors":"T. Blaxter, David Willis","doi":"10.1075/DIA.16040.BLA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article investigates the pragmatic function of new negative markers during incipient renewal of negation in\n ‘Jespersen’s cycle’. We outline a typology of these markers, suggesting a pathway by which they begin as specialized for use with\n discourse-old propositions and later expand to inferred propositions before finally becoming possible with discourse-new\n propositions. This framework is applied to an overlooked case of Jespersen’s cycle in North Germanic: replacement of early\n Norwegian ei(gi) “not” by ekki (originally “nothing”) from 1250 to 1550. We\n document a sharp rise in frequency of ekki around 1425, suggesting that, until then, ekki had\n been restricted to negating discourse-old propositions. Once this constraint was lifted, ei(gi)\n and ekki competed directly, resulting in rapid replacement of ei(gi) by\n ekki. This typologically unusual direct replacement of a negator with no intervening doubling stage can be\n attributed to the new negator’s origin as a negative indefinite and the lack of negative concord in early Norwegian.","PeriodicalId":44637,"journal":{"name":"Diachronica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pragmatic differentiation of negative markers in the early stages of Jespersen’s cycle in North\\n Germanic\",\"authors\":\"T. Blaxter, David Willis\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/DIA.16040.BLA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article investigates the pragmatic function of new negative markers during incipient renewal of negation in\\n ‘Jespersen’s cycle’. We outline a typology of these markers, suggesting a pathway by which they begin as specialized for use with\\n discourse-old propositions and later expand to inferred propositions before finally becoming possible with discourse-new\\n propositions. This framework is applied to an overlooked case of Jespersen’s cycle in North Germanic: replacement of early\\n Norwegian ei(gi) “not” by ekki (originally “nothing”) from 1250 to 1550. We\\n document a sharp rise in frequency of ekki around 1425, suggesting that, until then, ekki had\\n been restricted to negating discourse-old propositions. Once this constraint was lifted, ei(gi)\\n and ekki competed directly, resulting in rapid replacement of ei(gi) by\\n ekki. This typologically unusual direct replacement of a negator with no intervening doubling stage can be\\n attributed to the new negator’s origin as a negative indefinite and the lack of negative concord in early Norwegian.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diachronica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diachronica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/DIA.16040.BLA\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diachronica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/DIA.16040.BLA","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pragmatic differentiation of negative markers in the early stages of Jespersen’s cycle in North
Germanic
This article investigates the pragmatic function of new negative markers during incipient renewal of negation in
‘Jespersen’s cycle’. We outline a typology of these markers, suggesting a pathway by which they begin as specialized for use with
discourse-old propositions and later expand to inferred propositions before finally becoming possible with discourse-new
propositions. This framework is applied to an overlooked case of Jespersen’s cycle in North Germanic: replacement of early
Norwegian ei(gi) “not” by ekki (originally “nothing”) from 1250 to 1550. We
document a sharp rise in frequency of ekki around 1425, suggesting that, until then, ekki had
been restricted to negating discourse-old propositions. Once this constraint was lifted, ei(gi)
and ekki competed directly, resulting in rapid replacement of ei(gi) by
ekki. This typologically unusual direct replacement of a negator with no intervening doubling stage can be
attributed to the new negator’s origin as a negative indefinite and the lack of negative concord in early Norwegian.
期刊介绍:
Diachronica provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of information concerning all aspects of language change in any and all languages of the globe. Contributions which combine theoretical interest and philological acumen are especially welcome. Diachronica appears three times per year, publishing articles, review articles, book reviews, and a miscellanea section including notes, reports and discussions.