B. Zawieja, Krzysztof Turczański, T. Najgrakowski, K. Kazmierczak
{"title":"利用树干和树冠的可测量特征来评估橡树(Quercus robur L.)的生物社会分类","authors":"B. Zawieja, Krzysztof Turczański, T. Najgrakowski, K. Kazmierczak","doi":"10.46490/bf542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The crown class assessment is a key element in forestry practice. It is a traditional method that finds application in thinning plans, assessment of site index, tree competition, or crown condition. Assigning trees into a given class is done during field surveys and requires precision and experience to avoid inaccuracy. Therefore, Kraft’s system has often been criticized and modified. Thus, in our study, we aimed to analyse whether the directly measured traits of trunk and crown of oak trees (Quercus robur L.) can be applied to crown class assessment. For this purpose, we used the principal component analysis (PCA) and nonlinear kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) based on measurable traits of trunk and crown, i.e., the height of the tree, the diameter at breast height, the length of the crown, and the field crown projection area. In total, we measured 286 mature trees in three oak stands located in western Poland. Results indicate that all chosen traits of trunk and crown allowed, though not always perfect, to assign the trees into given crown classes. The greatest contribution to crown class distinction had the diameter at breast height and the parameters of crown, i.e., and the field crown projection area. Furthermore, results show that the best method of assigning the trees into biosocial classes is the KPCA Gauss, considering the percentage explanation of the total variability, and KPCA Laplace, considering the visual division. In the latter, the multivariate analysis resulted in a similar crown class assignment as the field-assigned method. However, its application requires measurements that make it neither cheaper nor faster than a traditional crown class assessment. It indicates that a traditional field-assigned method, despite its subjectivity, should continue to be of great importance in forestry practice. Moreover, the alternative traits of trunk and crown can be a potentially useful statistical substitute for crown class assessment. Keywords: crown class, oak stand, trunk and crown traits, multivariate methods","PeriodicalId":55404,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Forestry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of measurable traits of trunk and crown to assess the biosocial classes of oak trees (Quercus robur L.)\",\"authors\":\"B. Zawieja, Krzysztof Turczański, T. Najgrakowski, K. Kazmierczak\",\"doi\":\"10.46490/bf542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The crown class assessment is a key element in forestry practice. It is a traditional method that finds application in thinning plans, assessment of site index, tree competition, or crown condition. Assigning trees into a given class is done during field surveys and requires precision and experience to avoid inaccuracy. Therefore, Kraft’s system has often been criticized and modified. Thus, in our study, we aimed to analyse whether the directly measured traits of trunk and crown of oak trees (Quercus robur L.) can be applied to crown class assessment. For this purpose, we used the principal component analysis (PCA) and nonlinear kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) based on measurable traits of trunk and crown, i.e., the height of the tree, the diameter at breast height, the length of the crown, and the field crown projection area. In total, we measured 286 mature trees in three oak stands located in western Poland. Results indicate that all chosen traits of trunk and crown allowed, though not always perfect, to assign the trees into given crown classes. The greatest contribution to crown class distinction had the diameter at breast height and the parameters of crown, i.e., and the field crown projection area. Furthermore, results show that the best method of assigning the trees into biosocial classes is the KPCA Gauss, considering the percentage explanation of the total variability, and KPCA Laplace, considering the visual division. In the latter, the multivariate analysis resulted in a similar crown class assignment as the field-assigned method. However, its application requires measurements that make it neither cheaper nor faster than a traditional crown class assessment. It indicates that a traditional field-assigned method, despite its subjectivity, should continue to be of great importance in forestry practice. Moreover, the alternative traits of trunk and crown can be a potentially useful statistical substitute for crown class assessment. Keywords: crown class, oak stand, trunk and crown traits, multivariate methods\",\"PeriodicalId\":55404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Forestry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46490/bf542\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46490/bf542","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The use of measurable traits of trunk and crown to assess the biosocial classes of oak trees (Quercus robur L.)
The crown class assessment is a key element in forestry practice. It is a traditional method that finds application in thinning plans, assessment of site index, tree competition, or crown condition. Assigning trees into a given class is done during field surveys and requires precision and experience to avoid inaccuracy. Therefore, Kraft’s system has often been criticized and modified. Thus, in our study, we aimed to analyse whether the directly measured traits of trunk and crown of oak trees (Quercus robur L.) can be applied to crown class assessment. For this purpose, we used the principal component analysis (PCA) and nonlinear kernel principal component analysis (KPCA) based on measurable traits of trunk and crown, i.e., the height of the tree, the diameter at breast height, the length of the crown, and the field crown projection area. In total, we measured 286 mature trees in three oak stands located in western Poland. Results indicate that all chosen traits of trunk and crown allowed, though not always perfect, to assign the trees into given crown classes. The greatest contribution to crown class distinction had the diameter at breast height and the parameters of crown, i.e., and the field crown projection area. Furthermore, results show that the best method of assigning the trees into biosocial classes is the KPCA Gauss, considering the percentage explanation of the total variability, and KPCA Laplace, considering the visual division. In the latter, the multivariate analysis resulted in a similar crown class assignment as the field-assigned method. However, its application requires measurements that make it neither cheaper nor faster than a traditional crown class assessment. It indicates that a traditional field-assigned method, despite its subjectivity, should continue to be of great importance in forestry practice. Moreover, the alternative traits of trunk and crown can be a potentially useful statistical substitute for crown class assessment. Keywords: crown class, oak stand, trunk and crown traits, multivariate methods
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes the original articles as well as short reports, review papers on forestry and forest science throughout the Baltic Sea region and elsewhere in the area of boreal and temperate forests. The Baltic Sea region is rather unique through its intrinsic environment and distinguished geographical and social conditions. A temperate climate, transitional and continental, has influenced formation of the mixed coniferous and deciduous stands of high productivity and biological diversity. The forest science has been affected by the ideas from both the East and West.
In 1995, Forest Research Institutes and Universities from Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania
joined their efforts to publish BALTIC FORESTRY.