罗伯特·奥本海默的早期科学贡献:为什么科学界错过了黑洞的机会?

IF 0.1 3区哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Physics in Perspective Pub Date : 2017-03-09 DOI:10.1007/s00016-017-0195-6

M. Ortega-Rodríguez, H. Solís-Sánchez, E. Boza-Oviedo, K. Chaves-Cruz, M. Guevara-Bertsch, M. Quirós-Rojas, S. Vargas-Hernández, A. Venegas-Li

{"title":"罗伯特·奥本海默的早期科学贡献:为什么科学界错过了黑洞的机会?","authors":"M. Ortega-Rodríguez, H. Solís-Sánchez, E. Boza-Oviedo, K. Chaves-Cruz, M. Guevara-Bertsch, M. Quirós-Rojas, S. Vargas-Hernández, A. Venegas-Li","doi":"10.1007/s00016-017-0195-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We assess the scientific value of Oppenheimer’s research on black holes in order to explain its neglect by the scientific community, and even by Oppenheimer himself. Looking closely at the scientific culture and conceptual belief system of the 1930s, the present article seeks to supplement the existing literature by enriching the explanations and complicating the guiding questions. We suggest a rereading of Oppenheimer as a figure both more intriguing for the history of astrophysics and further ahead of his time than is commonly supposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":727,"journal":{"name":"Physics in Perspective","volume":"19 1","pages":"60 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00016-017-0195-6","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Early Scientific Contributions of J. Robert Oppenheimer: Why Did the Scientific Community Miss the Black Hole Opportunity?\",\"authors\":\"M. Ortega-Rodríguez, H. Solís-Sánchez, E. Boza-Oviedo, K. Chaves-Cruz, M. Guevara-Bertsch, M. Quirós-Rojas, S. Vargas-Hernández, A. Venegas-Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00016-017-0195-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We assess the scientific value of Oppenheimer’s research on black holes in order to explain its neglect by the scientific community, and even by Oppenheimer himself. Looking closely at the scientific culture and conceptual belief system of the 1930s, the present article seeks to supplement the existing literature by enriching the explanations and complicating the guiding questions. We suggest a rereading of Oppenheimer as a figure both more intriguing for the history of astrophysics and further ahead of his time than is commonly supposed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in Perspective\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"60 - 75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00016-017-0195-6\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in Perspective\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00016-017-0195-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00016-017-0195-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

我们评估奥本海默对黑洞研究的科学价值，以解释科学界甚至奥本海默本人对它的忽视。本文以20世纪30年代的科学文化和观念信仰体系为考察对象，力求通过丰富解释和复杂指导问题来补充现有文献。我们建议重新解读奥本海默，认为他在天体物理学史上是一个更有趣的人物，而且比人们通常认为的更超前。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Early Scientific Contributions of J. Robert Oppenheimer: Why Did the Scientific Community Miss the Black Hole Opportunity?

We assess the scientific value of Oppenheimer’s research on black holes in order to explain its neglect by the scientific community, and even by Oppenheimer himself. Looking closely at the scientific culture and conceptual belief system of the 1930s, the present article seeks to supplement the existing literature by enriching the explanations and complicating the guiding questions. We suggest a rereading of Oppenheimer as a figure both more intriguing for the history of astrophysics and further ahead of his time than is commonly supposed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Physics in Perspective 物理-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Physics in Perspective seeks to bridge the gulf between physicists and non-physicists through historical and philosophical studies that typically display the unpredictable as well as the cross-disciplinary interplay of observation, experiment, and theory that has occurred over extended periods of time in academic, governmental, and industrial settings and in allied disciplines such as astrophysics, chemical physics, and geophysics. The journal also publishes first-person accounts by physicists of significant contributions they have made, biographical articles, book reviews, and guided tours of historical sites in cities throughout the world. It strives to make all articles understandable to a broad spectrum of readers – scientists, teachers, students, and the public at large. Bibliographic Data Phys. Perspect. 1 volume per year, 4 issues per volume approx. 500 pages per volume Format: 15.5 x 23.5cm ISSN 1422-6944 (print) ISSN 1422-6960 (electronic)