自杀行为发病机制中的失败和陷阱

Q4 Psychology
S. Nukala, Srinivas Singisetti, Archana Vinnakota, Shvetha Chilikuri, Abhilash Garapati, Vidya Sanapala, Laxman Nambaru
{"title":"自杀行为发病机制中的失败和陷阱","authors":"S. Nukala, Srinivas Singisetti, Archana Vinnakota, Shvetha Chilikuri, Abhilash Garapati, Vidya Sanapala, Laxman Nambaru","doi":"10.4103/AMH.AMH_50_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Human behavior is very complex and driven by different motivations. At times, we find a deviant escape behavior in some situations, characterized by streaks of self-destruction or “suicidal behavior.” Defeat and entrapment have been hypothesized as central to this behavior. Aim: We aimed to study the relationship between defeat, entrapment, suicidal ideation, and suicidal attempt. Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study of fifty patients who attempted suicide and survived the attempt. When medically fit for psychological assessment, they were approached in a person in the hospital psychiatric ward. These patients were subjected to a detailed psychiatric interview, and any psychiatric illness in the patients was diagnosed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders V criteria. They were assessed on the defeat and entrapment scales by Gilbert and Allan. The Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation by Ivan W. Miller was used to determine the presence or absence of suicidal ideation and severity of suicidal ideation. Results: The presence of a current depressive disorder diagnosis and planning of attempt had a significant association with higher scores on internal entrapment, total entrapment, defeat, and suicidal ideation scales. The scores on defeat, internal entrapment, total entrapment, and suicidal ideation scales correlated positively and highly significantly. Conclusion: Entrapment and defeat are identified as important in the pathogenesis of depression and self-harm. Arrested escape and flight appear as motivation for suicidal behavior.","PeriodicalId":36181,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Mental Health","volume":"22 1","pages":"51 - 56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defeat and entrapment in the pathogenesis of suicidal behavior\",\"authors\":\"S. Nukala, Srinivas Singisetti, Archana Vinnakota, Shvetha Chilikuri, Abhilash Garapati, Vidya Sanapala, Laxman Nambaru\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/AMH.AMH_50_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Human behavior is very complex and driven by different motivations. At times, we find a deviant escape behavior in some situations, characterized by streaks of self-destruction or “suicidal behavior.” Defeat and entrapment have been hypothesized as central to this behavior. Aim: We aimed to study the relationship between defeat, entrapment, suicidal ideation, and suicidal attempt. Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study of fifty patients who attempted suicide and survived the attempt. When medically fit for psychological assessment, they were approached in a person in the hospital psychiatric ward. These patients were subjected to a detailed psychiatric interview, and any psychiatric illness in the patients was diagnosed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders V criteria. They were assessed on the defeat and entrapment scales by Gilbert and Allan. The Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation by Ivan W. Miller was used to determine the presence or absence of suicidal ideation and severity of suicidal ideation. Results: The presence of a current depressive disorder diagnosis and planning of attempt had a significant association with higher scores on internal entrapment, total entrapment, defeat, and suicidal ideation scales. The scores on defeat, internal entrapment, total entrapment, and suicidal ideation scales correlated positively and highly significantly. Conclusion: Entrapment and defeat are identified as important in the pathogenesis of depression and self-harm. Arrested escape and flight appear as motivation for suicidal behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/AMH.AMH_50_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/AMH.AMH_50_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:人类行为非常复杂,由不同的动机驱动。有时,我们会在某些情况下发现一种异常的逃跑行为,其特征是一连串的自我毁灭或“自杀行为”。失败和诱捕被认为是这种行为的核心。目的:我们旨在研究失败、诱捕、自杀意念和自杀企图之间的关系。材料和方法:本研究是对50名自杀未遂并在自杀未遂后幸存的患者进行的横断面研究。当他们的身体状况适合进行心理评估时,他们会在医院精神科病房的一个人那里接受治疗。这些患者接受了详细的精神科访谈,并使用《精神障碍诊断和统计手册》第五版标准对患者的任何精神疾病进行诊断。吉尔伯特和艾伦对他们的失败和诱捕程度进行了评估。Ivan W.Miller的《自杀意念修正量表》用于确定自杀意念的存在与否以及自杀意念的严重程度。结果:当前抑郁障碍的诊断和尝试计划的存在与内部诱捕、总诱捕、失败和自杀意念量表的高分显著相关。失败、内部诱捕、总诱捕和自杀意念量表的得分呈正相关且高度显著。结论:压抑和挫败在抑郁症和自残的发病机制中具有重要意义。逃跑和逃亡被捕似乎是自杀行为的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defeat and entrapment in the pathogenesis of suicidal behavior
Introduction: Human behavior is very complex and driven by different motivations. At times, we find a deviant escape behavior in some situations, characterized by streaks of self-destruction or “suicidal behavior.” Defeat and entrapment have been hypothesized as central to this behavior. Aim: We aimed to study the relationship between defeat, entrapment, suicidal ideation, and suicidal attempt. Materials and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study of fifty patients who attempted suicide and survived the attempt. When medically fit for psychological assessment, they were approached in a person in the hospital psychiatric ward. These patients were subjected to a detailed psychiatric interview, and any psychiatric illness in the patients was diagnosed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders V criteria. They were assessed on the defeat and entrapment scales by Gilbert and Allan. The Modified Scale for Suicidal Ideation by Ivan W. Miller was used to determine the presence or absence of suicidal ideation and severity of suicidal ideation. Results: The presence of a current depressive disorder diagnosis and planning of attempt had a significant association with higher scores on internal entrapment, total entrapment, defeat, and suicidal ideation scales. The scores on defeat, internal entrapment, total entrapment, and suicidal ideation scales correlated positively and highly significantly. Conclusion: Entrapment and defeat are identified as important in the pathogenesis of depression and self-harm. Arrested escape and flight appear as motivation for suicidal behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Mental Health
Archives of Mental Health Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信