{"title":"皮亚杰音阶只是智力测试吗?","authors":"Jordan Lasker","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2022.101702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Abstract</p><p><span>Previous research has noted the relationships between Piagetian and Psychometric tests. The literature on this topic has revealed consistent and moderate-to-high magnitude associations and largely unidimensional tests. However, most of this literature has not explicitly assessed whether Psychometric general intelligence corresponds to a similar factor measurable with Piagetian tests. This study did just that by fitting structural equation models to available data from administrations of Piagetian and Psychometric tests given to the same samples. The tests were modeled separately, and then in models where they were featured together so their general factors could be correlated. The results of those analyses were then subjected to a meta-analysis (</span><em>K</em> = 8, <em>N</em> = 862) and the meta-analytic relationship between Piagetian and Psychometric general factors was found to be exceptionally high (<em>r</em> = 0.847). Piagetian scales thus test intelligence, and intelligence tests assess Piagetian development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Piagetian scales just intelligence tests?\",\"authors\":\"Jordan Lasker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intell.2022.101702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Abstract</p><p><span>Previous research has noted the relationships between Piagetian and Psychometric tests. The literature on this topic has revealed consistent and moderate-to-high magnitude associations and largely unidimensional tests. However, most of this literature has not explicitly assessed whether Psychometric general intelligence corresponds to a similar factor measurable with Piagetian tests. This study did just that by fitting structural equation models to available data from administrations of Piagetian and Psychometric tests given to the same samples. The tests were modeled separately, and then in models where they were featured together so their general factors could be correlated. The results of those analyses were then subjected to a meta-analysis (</span><em>K</em> = 8, <em>N</em> = 862) and the meta-analytic relationship between Piagetian and Psychometric general factors was found to be exceptionally high (<em>r</em> = 0.847). Piagetian scales thus test intelligence, and intelligence tests assess Piagetian development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289622000836\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289622000836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要以往的研究已经注意到皮亚杰测验与心理测量测验之间的关系。关于这一主题的文献揭示了一致的和中等到高量级的关联和很大程度上的单维测试。然而,大多数这类文献并没有明确评估心理测量一般智力是否与皮亚杰测试可测量的类似因素相对应。这项研究正是通过将结构方程模型与提供给相同样本的皮亚杰和心理测量测试的管理数据相匹配来做到这一点的。这些测试分别建模,然后在模型中把它们放在一起,这样它们的一般因素就可以相互关联。然后对这些分析结果进行meta分析(K = 8, N = 862),发现Piagetian和心理测量学一般因素之间的meta分析关系异常高(r = 0.847)。因此,皮亚杰量表测试智力,智力测试评估皮亚杰发展。
Previous research has noted the relationships between Piagetian and Psychometric tests. The literature on this topic has revealed consistent and moderate-to-high magnitude associations and largely unidimensional tests. However, most of this literature has not explicitly assessed whether Psychometric general intelligence corresponds to a similar factor measurable with Piagetian tests. This study did just that by fitting structural equation models to available data from administrations of Piagetian and Psychometric tests given to the same samples. The tests were modeled separately, and then in models where they were featured together so their general factors could be correlated. The results of those analyses were then subjected to a meta-analysis (K = 8, N = 862) and the meta-analytic relationship between Piagetian and Psychometric general factors was found to be exceptionally high (r = 0.847). Piagetian scales thus test intelligence, and intelligence tests assess Piagetian development.