聚光太阳能蓄热发电在全可变可再生能源供电的低成本高可靠性电力系统中的作用

IF 13 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Kathleen M. Kennedy , Tyler H. Ruggles , Katherine Rinaldi , Jacqueline A. Dowling , Lei Duan , Ken Caldeira , Nathan S. Lewis
{"title":"聚光太阳能蓄热发电在全可变可再生能源供电的低成本高可靠性电力系统中的作用","authors":"Kathleen M. Kennedy ,&nbsp;Tyler H. Ruggles ,&nbsp;Katherine Rinaldi ,&nbsp;Jacqueline A. Dowling ,&nbsp;Lei Duan ,&nbsp;Ken Caldeira ,&nbsp;Nathan S. Lewis","doi":"10.1016/j.adapen.2022.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Policies in the US increasingly stipulate the use of variable renewable energy sources, which must be able to meet electricity demand reliably and affordably despite variability. The value of grid services provided by additional marginal capacity and storage in existing grids is likely very different than their value in a 100% variable renewable electricity system under such policies. Consequently, the role of concentrated solar power (CSP) and thermal energy storage (TES) relative to photovoltaics (PV) and batteries has not been clearly evaluated or established for such highly reliable, 100% renewable systems. Electricity generation by CSP is currently more costly than by PV, but TES is much less costly than chemical battery storage. Herein, we analyze the role of CSP and TES compared to PV and batteries in an idealized least-cost solar/wind/storage electricity system using a macro-scale energy model with real-world historical demand and hourly weather data across the contiguous United States. We find that CSP does not compete directly with PV. Instead, TES competes with short-duration storage from batteries, with the coupled CSP+TES system providing reliability in the absence of other grid flexibility mechanisms. Without TES, little CSP generation is built in this system because CSP and PV have similar generation profiles, but PV is currently cheaper on a dollar-per-kWh basis than CSP. However, CSP with TES can provide grid flexibility in the modeled least-cost system under some circumstances due to the low cost of TES compared to batteries. Cost-sensitivity analysis shows that penetration of CSP with TES is primarily limited by high CSP generation costs. These results provide a framework for researchers and decision-makers to assess the role of CSP with TES in future electricity systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34615,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Applied Energy","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000099/pdfft?md5=7ee01557850d9a7635e3eb1b6b5a0dc2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666792422000099-main.pdf","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of concentrated solar power with thermal energy storage in least-cost highly reliable electricity systems fully powered by variable renewable energy\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen M. Kennedy ,&nbsp;Tyler H. Ruggles ,&nbsp;Katherine Rinaldi ,&nbsp;Jacqueline A. Dowling ,&nbsp;Lei Duan ,&nbsp;Ken Caldeira ,&nbsp;Nathan S. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adapen.2022.100091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Policies in the US increasingly stipulate the use of variable renewable energy sources, which must be able to meet electricity demand reliably and affordably despite variability. The value of grid services provided by additional marginal capacity and storage in existing grids is likely very different than their value in a 100% variable renewable electricity system under such policies. Consequently, the role of concentrated solar power (CSP) and thermal energy storage (TES) relative to photovoltaics (PV) and batteries has not been clearly evaluated or established for such highly reliable, 100% renewable systems. Electricity generation by CSP is currently more costly than by PV, but TES is much less costly than chemical battery storage. Herein, we analyze the role of CSP and TES compared to PV and batteries in an idealized least-cost solar/wind/storage electricity system using a macro-scale energy model with real-world historical demand and hourly weather data across the contiguous United States. We find that CSP does not compete directly with PV. Instead, TES competes with short-duration storage from batteries, with the coupled CSP+TES system providing reliability in the absence of other grid flexibility mechanisms. Without TES, little CSP generation is built in this system because CSP and PV have similar generation profiles, but PV is currently cheaper on a dollar-per-kWh basis than CSP. However, CSP with TES can provide grid flexibility in the modeled least-cost system under some circumstances due to the low cost of TES compared to batteries. Cost-sensitivity analysis shows that penetration of CSP with TES is primarily limited by high CSP generation costs. These results provide a framework for researchers and decision-makers to assess the role of CSP with TES in future electricity systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000099/pdfft?md5=7ee01557850d9a7635e3eb1b6b5a0dc2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666792422000099-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666792422000099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

美国的政策越来越多地规定使用可变的可再生能源,这种能源必须能够可靠地、经济地满足电力需求,尽管存在可变性。现有电网中额外的边际容量和存储所提供的电网服务的价值可能与此类政策下100%可变可再生电力系统的价值大不相同。因此,相对于光伏(PV)和电池,聚光太阳能(CSP)和热能储存(TES)的作用尚未得到明确的评估或建立,用于这种高度可靠的100%可再生系统。目前,CSP发电比PV发电成本更高,但TES比化学电池储能成本低得多。在此,我们使用具有真实世界历史需求和美国连续每小时天气数据的宏观能源模型,分析了CSP和TES在理想的最低成本太阳能/风能/储能系统中与光伏和电池相比的作用。我们发现CSP并不直接与PV竞争。相反,TES与电池的短时间存储竞争,耦合的CSP+TES系统在没有其他电网灵活性机制的情况下提供可靠性。如果没有TES,这个系统中很少有CSP发电,因为CSP和PV有相似的发电概况,但目前PV比CSP每千瓦时便宜。然而,在某些情况下,由于TES与电池相比成本较低,CSP与TES可以在建模的最低成本系统中提供电网灵活性。成本敏感性分析表明,CSP与TES的渗透主要受到高CSP发电成本的限制。这些结果为研究人员和决策者提供了一个框架,以评估CSP与TES在未来电力系统中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of concentrated solar power with thermal energy storage in least-cost highly reliable electricity systems fully powered by variable renewable energy

Policies in the US increasingly stipulate the use of variable renewable energy sources, which must be able to meet electricity demand reliably and affordably despite variability. The value of grid services provided by additional marginal capacity and storage in existing grids is likely very different than their value in a 100% variable renewable electricity system under such policies. Consequently, the role of concentrated solar power (CSP) and thermal energy storage (TES) relative to photovoltaics (PV) and batteries has not been clearly evaluated or established for such highly reliable, 100% renewable systems. Electricity generation by CSP is currently more costly than by PV, but TES is much less costly than chemical battery storage. Herein, we analyze the role of CSP and TES compared to PV and batteries in an idealized least-cost solar/wind/storage electricity system using a macro-scale energy model with real-world historical demand and hourly weather data across the contiguous United States. We find that CSP does not compete directly with PV. Instead, TES competes with short-duration storage from batteries, with the coupled CSP+TES system providing reliability in the absence of other grid flexibility mechanisms. Without TES, little CSP generation is built in this system because CSP and PV have similar generation profiles, but PV is currently cheaper on a dollar-per-kWh basis than CSP. However, CSP with TES can provide grid flexibility in the modeled least-cost system under some circumstances due to the low cost of TES compared to batteries. Cost-sensitivity analysis shows that penetration of CSP with TES is primarily limited by high CSP generation costs. These results provide a framework for researchers and decision-makers to assess the role of CSP with TES in future electricity systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Applied Energy
Advances in Applied Energy Energy-General Energy
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信