心态对公平纪律很重要:中学教育工作者的信念与实践相一致

Q3 Social Sciences
Magdalena King Lund, Autumn Hillis, Jill I. Green, Emily L. Mofield
{"title":"心态对公平纪律很重要:中学教育工作者的信念与实践相一致","authors":"Magdalena King Lund, Autumn Hillis, Jill I. Green, Emily L. Mofield","doi":"10.1080/00940771.2021.1893592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Restorative Justice Practices (RJP) offer a positive approach to discipline while also providing middle school students opportunities to develop social-emotional skills (conflict resolution and self-management). RJP contrasts sharply with traditional, punitive, zero-tolerance discipline models which perpetuate systemic inequity in schools, especially for students of color. When considering the impact of RJP on young adolescents, teachers’ underlying beliefs about student discipline warrant examination. Because beliefs ultimately lead to practice, identifying teachers’ beliefs (mind-sets) about discipline practices are necessary in implementing change, particularly in responding to negative student behaviors. In the present study, we examined the discipline mind-sets among teachers of a public middle school implementing RJP in the Southeast United States. Results indicate that even with the intentional school-wide implementation of RJP, teachers’ mind-sets of these practices did not show significant change, and in some cases, aligned less with restorative justice ideology.","PeriodicalId":37061,"journal":{"name":"Middle School Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"15 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00940771.2021.1893592","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mindsets matter for equitable discipline: Aligning beliefs to practice among middle grade educators\",\"authors\":\"Magdalena King Lund, Autumn Hillis, Jill I. Green, Emily L. Mofield\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00940771.2021.1893592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Restorative Justice Practices (RJP) offer a positive approach to discipline while also providing middle school students opportunities to develop social-emotional skills (conflict resolution and self-management). RJP contrasts sharply with traditional, punitive, zero-tolerance discipline models which perpetuate systemic inequity in schools, especially for students of color. When considering the impact of RJP on young adolescents, teachers’ underlying beliefs about student discipline warrant examination. Because beliefs ultimately lead to practice, identifying teachers’ beliefs (mind-sets) about discipline practices are necessary in implementing change, particularly in responding to negative student behaviors. In the present study, we examined the discipline mind-sets among teachers of a public middle school implementing RJP in the Southeast United States. Results indicate that even with the intentional school-wide implementation of RJP, teachers’ mind-sets of these practices did not show significant change, and in some cases, aligned less with restorative justice ideology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle School Journal\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"15 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00940771.2021.1893592\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle School Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2021.1893592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2021.1893592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要恢复性司法实践(RJP)提供了一种积极的纪律方法,同时也为中学生提供了发展社会情感技能(冲突解决和自我管理)的机会。RJP与传统的、惩罚性的、零容忍的纪律模式形成了鲜明对比,这种模式使学校中的系统性不平等现象长期存在,尤其是对有色人种学生而言。在考虑RJP对青少年的影响时,教师对学生纪律的基本信念值得检验。因为信念最终会导致实践,所以在实施变革时,特别是在应对学生的负面行为时,识别教师对纪律实践的信念(心态)是必要的。在本研究中,我们调查了美国东南部一所实施RJP的公立中学教师的纪律心态。结果表明,即使在学校范围内有意实施RJP,教师对这些做法的心态也没有表现出显著变化,在某些情况下,与恢复性司法意识形态的一致性也较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mindsets matter for equitable discipline: Aligning beliefs to practice among middle grade educators
Abstract Restorative Justice Practices (RJP) offer a positive approach to discipline while also providing middle school students opportunities to develop social-emotional skills (conflict resolution and self-management). RJP contrasts sharply with traditional, punitive, zero-tolerance discipline models which perpetuate systemic inequity in schools, especially for students of color. When considering the impact of RJP on young adolescents, teachers’ underlying beliefs about student discipline warrant examination. Because beliefs ultimately lead to practice, identifying teachers’ beliefs (mind-sets) about discipline practices are necessary in implementing change, particularly in responding to negative student behaviors. In the present study, we examined the discipline mind-sets among teachers of a public middle school implementing RJP in the Southeast United States. Results indicate that even with the intentional school-wide implementation of RJP, teachers’ mind-sets of these practices did not show significant change, and in some cases, aligned less with restorative justice ideology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Middle School Journal
Middle School Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信