丙泊酚和罗库在麻醉诱导中的注射疼痛和戒断运动对妇科腹腔镜手术术后疼痛结果的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Singapore medical journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-13 DOI:10.11622/smedj.2022040
Cheol Lee, Hyeonbin Yim, Hyangdo Ham
{"title":"丙泊酚和罗库在麻醉诱导中的注射疼痛和戒断运动对妇科腹腔镜手术术后疼痛结果的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Cheol Lee, Hyeonbin Yim, Hyangdo Ham","doi":"10.11622/smedj.2022040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The experience and perception of pain may vary among individuals.This prospective cohort study aimed to determine the impact of injection pain/withdrawal movement of propofol and rocuronium in the induction of anaesthesia on postoperative pain outcomes in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients aged 19-60 years received propofol and rocuronium injections for the induction of anaesthesia. The incidence of propofol injection pain (PIP) and rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement (RIWM), postoperative pain scores and total opioid consumption were evaluated, and the associations between PIP/RIWM and postoperative pain outcomes were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain after surgery and total opioid consumption after surgery were significantly higher in patients with PIP or RIWM than in patients without PIP or RIWM. The correlations of PIP/RIWM with VAS at 1 h, VAS at 24 h and total opioid consumption were significant and weakly positive ( r = 0.249, r = 0.234, r = 0.22 and r = 0.234, respectively). The RIWM correlated more positively with pain score compared to PIP at 1 h ( r = 0.408 vs. r = 0.234), PIP at 24 h ( r = 0.398 vs. r = 0.227) and with total opioid consumption for 48 h after surgery ( r = 0.457 vs. r = 0.234).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During anaesthesia induction, the occurrence of PIP and RIWM may predict the severity of postoperative pain and total opioid consumption, with RIWM emerging as a stronger predictor than PIP.</p>","PeriodicalId":21752,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of injection pain and withdrawal movement of propofol and rocuronium in the induction of anaesthesia on postoperative pain outcomes in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Cheol Lee, Hyeonbin Yim, Hyangdo Ham\",\"doi\":\"10.11622/smedj.2022040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The experience and perception of pain may vary among individuals.This prospective cohort study aimed to determine the impact of injection pain/withdrawal movement of propofol and rocuronium in the induction of anaesthesia on postoperative pain outcomes in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients aged 19-60 years received propofol and rocuronium injections for the induction of anaesthesia. The incidence of propofol injection pain (PIP) and rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement (RIWM), postoperative pain scores and total opioid consumption were evaluated, and the associations between PIP/RIWM and postoperative pain outcomes were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain after surgery and total opioid consumption after surgery were significantly higher in patients with PIP or RIWM than in patients without PIP or RIWM. The correlations of PIP/RIWM with VAS at 1 h, VAS at 24 h and total opioid consumption were significant and weakly positive ( r = 0.249, r = 0.234, r = 0.22 and r = 0.234, respectively). The RIWM correlated more positively with pain score compared to PIP at 1 h ( r = 0.408 vs. r = 0.234), PIP at 24 h ( r = 0.398 vs. r = 0.227) and with total opioid consumption for 48 h after surgery ( r = 0.457 vs. r = 0.234).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During anaesthesia induction, the occurrence of PIP and RIWM may predict the severity of postoperative pain and total opioid consumption, with RIWM emerging as a stronger predictor than PIP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232709/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2022040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2022040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言不同个体的疼痛体验可能不同。这项前瞻性队列研究旨在确定丙泊酚和罗库在麻醉诱导中的注射疼痛/戒断运动对妇科腹腔镜手术术后疼痛结果的影响。方法对100名年龄在19-60岁的患者进行丙泊酚和罗库注射麻醉诱导。评估丙泊酚注射疼痛(PIP)和罗库诱导的戒断运动(RIWM)的发生率、术后疼痛评分和阿片类药物总消耗量,并确定PIP/RIWM与术后疼痛结果之间的关系。结果PIP或RIWM患者术后疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和术后阿片类药物总消耗量显著高于非PIP或RIWM患者。PIP与RIWM、1小时VAS、24小时VAS、阿片类药物总消耗量之间的相关性显著且弱阳性(分别为r=0.249、r=0.234、r=0.22、r=0.23)。与PIP相比,RIWM与1小时(r=0.408 vs.r=0.234,RIWM vs.PIP)和24小时(r=0.398 vs.r=0.227,RIWM vs PIP)的疼痛评分以及48小时后的阿片类药物总消耗量(r=0.457 vs.r=.234,RIWMvs.PIP)呈正相关。结论在麻醉诱导期间,PIP和RIWM的发生可以预测术后疼痛的严重程度和阿片类物质总消耗量,RIWM作为比PIP更强的预测因子出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of injection pain and withdrawal movement of propofol and rocuronium in the induction of anaesthesia on postoperative pain outcomes in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a prospective observational study.

Introduction: The experience and perception of pain may vary among individuals.This prospective cohort study aimed to determine the impact of injection pain/withdrawal movement of propofol and rocuronium in the induction of anaesthesia on postoperative pain outcomes in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.

Methods: A total of 100 patients aged 19-60 years received propofol and rocuronium injections for the induction of anaesthesia. The incidence of propofol injection pain (PIP) and rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement (RIWM), postoperative pain scores and total opioid consumption were evaluated, and the associations between PIP/RIWM and postoperative pain outcomes were determined.

Results: Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain after surgery and total opioid consumption after surgery were significantly higher in patients with PIP or RIWM than in patients without PIP or RIWM. The correlations of PIP/RIWM with VAS at 1 h, VAS at 24 h and total opioid consumption were significant and weakly positive ( r = 0.249, r = 0.234, r = 0.22 and r = 0.234, respectively). The RIWM correlated more positively with pain score compared to PIP at 1 h ( r = 0.408 vs. r = 0.234), PIP at 24 h ( r = 0.398 vs. r = 0.227) and with total opioid consumption for 48 h after surgery ( r = 0.457 vs. r = 0.234).

Conclusion: During anaesthesia induction, the occurrence of PIP and RIWM may predict the severity of postoperative pain and total opioid consumption, with RIWM emerging as a stronger predictor than PIP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Singapore medical journal
Singapore medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ) is the monthly publication of Singapore Medical Association (SMA). The Journal aims to advance medical practice and clinical research by publishing high-quality articles that add to the clinical knowledge of physicians in Singapore and worldwide. SMJ is a general medical journal that focuses on all aspects of human health. The Journal publishes commissioned reviews, commentaries and editorials, original research, a small number of outstanding case reports, continuing medical education articles (ECG Series, Clinics in Diagnostic Imaging, Pictorial Essays, Practice Integration & Life-long Learning [PILL] Series), and short communications in the form of letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信