低抵抗倾向和繁殖成功使得抵抗对受威胁的管鸻(Charadrius melodus)无效。

IF 2.6 2区 生物学 Q1 ORNITHOLOGY
Condor Pub Date : 2020-02-18 DOI:10.1093/condor/duz066
Rose J. Swift, Michael J. Anteau, Megan M. Ring, Dustin L. Toy, M. Sherfy
{"title":"低抵抗倾向和繁殖成功使得抵抗对受威胁的管鸻(Charadrius melodus)无效。","authors":"Rose J. Swift, Michael J. Anteau, Megan M. Ring, Dustin L. Toy, M. Sherfy","doi":"10.1093/condor/duz066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Upon reproductive failure, many bird species make a secondary attempt at nesting (hereafter, ″renesting”). Renesting may be an effective strategy to maximize current and lifetime reproductive success, but individuals face uncertainty in the probability of success because reproductive attempts initiated later in the breeding season often have reduced nest, pre-fledging, and post-fledging brood survival. We evaluated renesting propensity, renesting intervals, and renest reproductive success of Piping Plovers (Charadrius melodus) by following 1,922 nests and 1,785 unique breeding adults from 2014 to 2016 in the Northern Great Plains of the United States. The apparent renesting rate for individuals was 25% for reproductive attempts that failed in the nest stage (egg laying and incubation) and only 1.2% for reproductive attempts when broods were lost. Renesting propensity declined if reproductive attempts failed during the brood-rearing stage, nests were depredated, reproductive failure occurred later in the breeding season, or individuals had previously renested that year. Additionally, plovers that nested on reservoirs were less likely to renest compared to other habitats. Renesting intervals declined when individuals had not already renested, were after-second-year adults without known prior breeding experience, and moved short distances between nest attempts. Renesting intervals also decreased if the attempt failed later in the season. Overall, reproductive success and daily nest survival were lower for renests than first nests throughout the breeding season. Furthermore, renests on reservoirs had reduced apparent reproductive success and daily nest survival unless the predicted amount of habitat on reservoirs increased within the breeding season. Our results provide important demographic measures for this threatened species and suggest that predation- and water-management strategies that maximize success of early nests would be more likely to increase productivity. Altogether, renesting appears to be an unproductive reproductive strategy to replace lost reproductive attempts for Piping Plovers breeding in the Northern Great Plains.","PeriodicalId":50624,"journal":{"name":"Condor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/condor/duz066","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low renesting propensity and reproductive success make renesting unproductive for the threatened Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus)\",\"authors\":\"Rose J. Swift, Michael J. Anteau, Megan M. Ring, Dustin L. Toy, M. Sherfy\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/condor/duz066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Upon reproductive failure, many bird species make a secondary attempt at nesting (hereafter, ″renesting”). Renesting may be an effective strategy to maximize current and lifetime reproductive success, but individuals face uncertainty in the probability of success because reproductive attempts initiated later in the breeding season often have reduced nest, pre-fledging, and post-fledging brood survival. We evaluated renesting propensity, renesting intervals, and renest reproductive success of Piping Plovers (Charadrius melodus) by following 1,922 nests and 1,785 unique breeding adults from 2014 to 2016 in the Northern Great Plains of the United States. The apparent renesting rate for individuals was 25% for reproductive attempts that failed in the nest stage (egg laying and incubation) and only 1.2% for reproductive attempts when broods were lost. Renesting propensity declined if reproductive attempts failed during the brood-rearing stage, nests were depredated, reproductive failure occurred later in the breeding season, or individuals had previously renested that year. Additionally, plovers that nested on reservoirs were less likely to renest compared to other habitats. Renesting intervals declined when individuals had not already renested, were after-second-year adults without known prior breeding experience, and moved short distances between nest attempts. Renesting intervals also decreased if the attempt failed later in the season. Overall, reproductive success and daily nest survival were lower for renests than first nests throughout the breeding season. Furthermore, renests on reservoirs had reduced apparent reproductive success and daily nest survival unless the predicted amount of habitat on reservoirs increased within the breeding season. Our results provide important demographic measures for this threatened species and suggest that predation- and water-management strategies that maximize success of early nests would be more likely to increase productivity. Altogether, renesting appears to be an unproductive reproductive strategy to replace lost reproductive attempts for Piping Plovers breeding in the Northern Great Plains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Condor\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/condor/duz066\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Condor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duz066\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORNITHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Condor","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duz066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

繁殖失败后,许多鸟类会进行第二次筑巢尝试(以下简称″resting”)。抵抗可能是最大化当前和终身繁殖成功的有效策略,但个体面临着成功概率的不确定性,因为在繁殖季节后期开始的繁殖尝试通常会减少巢,羽化前和羽化后的后代存活率。2014年至2016年,通过对美国北部大平原1922个巢和1785只独特繁殖成虫的跟踪调查,研究了笛鸻(Charadrius melodus)的反巢倾向、反巢间隔和巢内繁殖成功率。在筑巢阶段(产卵和孵化)繁殖尝试失败的个体的表观拒绝率为25%,而在失去窝群时进行繁殖尝试的个体的表观拒绝率仅为1.2%。如果在育雏阶段繁殖失败,巢穴被破坏,繁殖失败发生在繁殖季节的后期,或者个体在当年曾经进行过繁殖,那么抵抗倾向就会下降。此外,与其他栖息地相比,在水库上筑巢的鸻不太可能休息。当个体还没有筑巢时,当它们是两年以后没有已知的繁殖经验的成年个体,并且在筑巢尝试之间移动很短的距离时,它们的筑巢间隔会缩短。如果在赛季后期尝试失败,那么再次尝试的时间间隔也会减少。总体而言,在整个繁殖季节,新巢的繁殖成功率和每日巢存活率低于第一次筑巢。此外,水库上的天敌降低了明显的繁殖成功率和每天的巢存活率,除非在繁殖季节水库上的栖息地预测量增加。我们的研究结果为这一濒危物种提供了重要的人口统计指标,并表明捕食和水管理策略可以最大限度地提高早期巢穴的成功率,从而更有可能提高生产力。总的来说,抵抗似乎是一种非生产性的繁殖策略,以取代在北部大平原繁殖的管鸻失去的繁殖尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low renesting propensity and reproductive success make renesting unproductive for the threatened Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus)
ABSTRACT Upon reproductive failure, many bird species make a secondary attempt at nesting (hereafter, ″renesting”). Renesting may be an effective strategy to maximize current and lifetime reproductive success, but individuals face uncertainty in the probability of success because reproductive attempts initiated later in the breeding season often have reduced nest, pre-fledging, and post-fledging brood survival. We evaluated renesting propensity, renesting intervals, and renest reproductive success of Piping Plovers (Charadrius melodus) by following 1,922 nests and 1,785 unique breeding adults from 2014 to 2016 in the Northern Great Plains of the United States. The apparent renesting rate for individuals was 25% for reproductive attempts that failed in the nest stage (egg laying and incubation) and only 1.2% for reproductive attempts when broods were lost. Renesting propensity declined if reproductive attempts failed during the brood-rearing stage, nests were depredated, reproductive failure occurred later in the breeding season, or individuals had previously renested that year. Additionally, plovers that nested on reservoirs were less likely to renest compared to other habitats. Renesting intervals declined when individuals had not already renested, were after-second-year adults without known prior breeding experience, and moved short distances between nest attempts. Renesting intervals also decreased if the attempt failed later in the season. Overall, reproductive success and daily nest survival were lower for renests than first nests throughout the breeding season. Furthermore, renests on reservoirs had reduced apparent reproductive success and daily nest survival unless the predicted amount of habitat on reservoirs increased within the breeding season. Our results provide important demographic measures for this threatened species and suggest that predation- and water-management strategies that maximize success of early nests would be more likely to increase productivity. Altogether, renesting appears to be an unproductive reproductive strategy to replace lost reproductive attempts for Piping Plovers breeding in the Northern Great Plains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Condor
Condor ORNITHOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Condor is the official publication of the Cooper Ornithological Society, a non-profit organization of over 2,000 professional and amateur ornithologists and one of the largest ornithological societies in the world. A quarterly international journal that publishes original research from all fields of avian biology, The Condor has been a highly respected forum in ornithology for more than 100 years. The journal is one of the top ranked ornithology publications. Types of paper published include feature articles (longer manuscripts) Short Communications (generally shorter papers or papers that deal with one primary finding), Commentaries (brief papers that comment on articles published previously in The Condor), and Book Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信