非洲主体性的语法和修辞:伦理、形象和语言

Q3 Social Sciences
Adedoyin Ogunfeyimi
{"title":"非洲主体性的语法和修辞:伦理、形象和语言","authors":"Adedoyin Ogunfeyimi","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2021.2001842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article advances existing studies on ethics, image, and language in rhetoric by offering three key interventions. First, ethics, a reasonable rhetorical practice that enables informed decisions, does not respond to colonial ethics that constructs West Africans as nonhumans, hence the need for an onto-logical ethics that affirms West Africans as reasonably human. Second, decoloniality offers an alternative visual rhetorical model to the common visual perception of Africa that blurs Africans and their essences, a gap that often denies Africans their subject positions, and that almost always gets theorized away in visual rhetoric and communication studies. Third, colonial language—however Africans claim to own it for their rhetorical and creative purposes—almost always expands and advances its linguistic imprint and empiric presence on the users of the language in Africa.","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"21 1","pages":"310 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The grammar and rhetoric of African subjectivity: ethics, image, and language\",\"authors\":\"Adedoyin Ogunfeyimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15358593.2021.2001842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article advances existing studies on ethics, image, and language in rhetoric by offering three key interventions. First, ethics, a reasonable rhetorical practice that enables informed decisions, does not respond to colonial ethics that constructs West Africans as nonhumans, hence the need for an onto-logical ethics that affirms West Africans as reasonably human. Second, decoloniality offers an alternative visual rhetorical model to the common visual perception of Africa that blurs Africans and their essences, a gap that often denies Africans their subject positions, and that almost always gets theorized away in visual rhetoric and communication studies. Third, colonial language—however Africans claim to own it for their rhetorical and creative purposes—almost always expands and advances its linguistic imprint and empiric presence on the users of the language in Africa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Communication\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"310 - 326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2021.2001842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2021.2001842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文通过提出三个关键的干预措施,对修辞学中的伦理、形象和语言的现有研究进行了推进。首先,伦理学是一种合理的修辞实践,能够做出明智的决定,它对将西非人建构为非人类的殖民伦理没有反应,因此需要一种本体论伦理来肯定西非人是合理的人类。其次,非殖民化提供了另一种视觉修辞模式,以取代对非洲的普通视觉感知,这种感知模糊了非洲人和他们的本质,这种差距经常否认非洲人的主体地位,并且几乎总是在视觉修辞和传播研究中被理论化。第三,殖民地语言——无论非洲人出于修辞和创造性目的而声称拥有它——几乎总是在非洲语言使用者身上扩展和推进其语言印记和经验存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The grammar and rhetoric of African subjectivity: ethics, image, and language
ABSTRACT This article advances existing studies on ethics, image, and language in rhetoric by offering three key interventions. First, ethics, a reasonable rhetorical practice that enables informed decisions, does not respond to colonial ethics that constructs West Africans as nonhumans, hence the need for an onto-logical ethics that affirms West Africans as reasonably human. Second, decoloniality offers an alternative visual rhetorical model to the common visual perception of Africa that blurs Africans and their essences, a gap that often denies Africans their subject positions, and that almost always gets theorized away in visual rhetoric and communication studies. Third, colonial language—however Africans claim to own it for their rhetorical and creative purposes—almost always expands and advances its linguistic imprint and empiric presence on the users of the language in Africa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Communication
Review of Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信