最初出现尿脓毒症的患者计划经皮肾镜取石:结果和并发症分析

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
A. Fahmy, K. Saad, W. Sameh, O. Elgebaly
{"title":"最初出现尿脓毒症的患者计划经皮肾镜取石:结果和并发症分析","authors":"A. Fahmy, K. Saad, W. Sameh, O. Elgebaly","doi":"10.1080/2090598X.2021.2002635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective To compare the outcomes and complications of planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with a prior urosepsis episode to those without. Patients and Methods We recorded patients who presented initially with obstructive urosepsis, as identified by systemic inflammatory response syndrome and obstructing kidney stones. We compared the surgical outcomes and complications among those patients who had planned PCNL after control of prior urosepsis with urgent decompression and antibiotics (Group A) to a group who presented for PCNL with no previous history of a septic presentations (Group B). A 1:1 matched-pair analysis was performed using four parameters (age, gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification) to eliminate potential allocation bias. Primary outcomes included were stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rate. Secondary outcomes included were operative time, estimated blood loss, and duration of postoperative hospital stay. Results A total of 80 patients underwent PCNL (48 male and 32 females) divided equally between both treatment groups, with a mean (interquartile range) age of 47 (19–75) years. There were no differences in demographic data or stone characteristics between both groups. Both groups had comparable SFRs (92.5% vs 97.5%, P = 0.212) and mean operative time (77 vs 74 min, P = 0.728) (Table 2). Patients in Group A had a significantly higher overall complications rate (35% vs 10%, P = 0.03) . There were no postoperative mortalities and the mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in Group A patients compared to group B (4.2 vs 1.5 days, P = 0.042). Conclusions : Planned PCNL after decompression for urolithiasis-related sepsis has comparable operative time and SFR but higher complication rates and longer postoperative hospital stay. This is critical in counselling patients prior to definitive treatment of kidney stones after urgent decompression for urosepsis and for adequate preoperative planning and preparation. Abbreviations: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI: body mass index; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; PCN: percutaneous nephrostomy; PCNL: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; SFR: stone-free rate; URS; ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":"20 1","pages":"36 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: Analysis of outcomes and complications\",\"authors\":\"A. Fahmy, K. Saad, W. Sameh, O. Elgebaly\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2090598X.2021.2002635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective To compare the outcomes and complications of planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with a prior urosepsis episode to those without. Patients and Methods We recorded patients who presented initially with obstructive urosepsis, as identified by systemic inflammatory response syndrome and obstructing kidney stones. We compared the surgical outcomes and complications among those patients who had planned PCNL after control of prior urosepsis with urgent decompression and antibiotics (Group A) to a group who presented for PCNL with no previous history of a septic presentations (Group B). A 1:1 matched-pair analysis was performed using four parameters (age, gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification) to eliminate potential allocation bias. Primary outcomes included were stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rate. Secondary outcomes included were operative time, estimated blood loss, and duration of postoperative hospital stay. Results A total of 80 patients underwent PCNL (48 male and 32 females) divided equally between both treatment groups, with a mean (interquartile range) age of 47 (19–75) years. There were no differences in demographic data or stone characteristics between both groups. Both groups had comparable SFRs (92.5% vs 97.5%, P = 0.212) and mean operative time (77 vs 74 min, P = 0.728) (Table 2). Patients in Group A had a significantly higher overall complications rate (35% vs 10%, P = 0.03) . There were no postoperative mortalities and the mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in Group A patients compared to group B (4.2 vs 1.5 days, P = 0.042). Conclusions : Planned PCNL after decompression for urolithiasis-related sepsis has comparable operative time and SFR but higher complication rates and longer postoperative hospital stay. This is critical in counselling patients prior to definitive treatment of kidney stones after urgent decompression for urosepsis and for adequate preoperative planning and preparation. Abbreviations: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI: body mass index; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; PCN: percutaneous nephrostomy; PCNL: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; SFR: stone-free rate; URS; ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography\",\"PeriodicalId\":8113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"36 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.2002635\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.2002635","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】目的比较有尿脓毒症与无尿脓毒症患者计划经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的预后和并发症。患者和方法我们记录了最初表现为梗阻性尿脓毒症的患者,并通过全身炎症反应综合征和梗阻性肾结石进行鉴定。我们比较了在控制既往尿脓毒症后计划PCNL的患者(A组)和没有脓毒症病史的PCNL患者(B组)的手术结果和并发症。使用四个参数(年龄、性别、体重指数和美国麻醉师学会分类)进行1:1配对分析,以消除潜在的分配偏倚。主要结果包括无结石率(SFR)和并发症发生率。次要结局包括手术时间、估计失血量和术后住院时间。结果接受PCNL的患者共80例(男性48例,女性32例),两组平均分为两组,平均年龄(四分位数间距)为47(19-75)岁。两组之间的人口统计数据和结石特征没有差异。两组患者的SFRs (92.5% vs 97.5%, P = 0.212)和平均手术时间(77 vs 74 min, P = 0.728)相当(表2)。A组患者的总并发症发生率显著高于A组(35% vs 10%, P = 0.03)。与B组患者相比,A组患者无术后死亡,平均住院时间明显更长(4.2 vs 1.5天,P = 0.042)。结论:尿石症相关脓毒症减压后计划PCNL手术时间和SFR相当,但并发症发生率较高,术后住院时间较长。这对于尿脓毒症紧急减压后肾结石最终治疗前的咨询和充分的术前计划和准备是至关重要的。缩写词:ASA:美国麻醉师学会;BMI:身体质量指数;ICU:重症监护病房;IQR:四分位间距;KUB:肾脏、输尿管和膀胱的腹部平片;PCN:经皮肾造口术;PCNL:经皮肾镜术;SFR:无石率;用户需求说明书;输尿管镜;我们:超声
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who initially presented with urosepsis: Analysis of outcomes and complications
ABSTRACT Objective To compare the outcomes and complications of planned percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with a prior urosepsis episode to those without. Patients and Methods We recorded patients who presented initially with obstructive urosepsis, as identified by systemic inflammatory response syndrome and obstructing kidney stones. We compared the surgical outcomes and complications among those patients who had planned PCNL after control of prior urosepsis with urgent decompression and antibiotics (Group A) to a group who presented for PCNL with no previous history of a septic presentations (Group B). A 1:1 matched-pair analysis was performed using four parameters (age, gender, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification) to eliminate potential allocation bias. Primary outcomes included were stone-free rate (SFR) and complication rate. Secondary outcomes included were operative time, estimated blood loss, and duration of postoperative hospital stay. Results A total of 80 patients underwent PCNL (48 male and 32 females) divided equally between both treatment groups, with a mean (interquartile range) age of 47 (19–75) years. There were no differences in demographic data or stone characteristics between both groups. Both groups had comparable SFRs (92.5% vs 97.5%, P = 0.212) and mean operative time (77 vs 74 min, P = 0.728) (Table 2). Patients in Group A had a significantly higher overall complications rate (35% vs 10%, P = 0.03) . There were no postoperative mortalities and the mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in Group A patients compared to group B (4.2 vs 1.5 days, P = 0.042). Conclusions : Planned PCNL after decompression for urolithiasis-related sepsis has comparable operative time and SFR but higher complication rates and longer postoperative hospital stay. This is critical in counselling patients prior to definitive treatment of kidney stones after urgent decompression for urosepsis and for adequate preoperative planning and preparation. Abbreviations: ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI: body mass index; ICU: intensive care unit; IQR: interquartile range; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; PCN: percutaneous nephrostomy; PCNL: percutaneous nephrolithotomy; SFR: stone-free rate; URS; ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信