Infection of word meanings and deletion of new meanings

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
福祥 吴
{"title":"Infection of word meanings and deletion of new meanings","authors":"福祥 吴","doi":"10.1353/jcl.2022.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"摘要:本文讨论两种词义衍生的过程,即“词义感染”和“删略生义”。前者(“词义感染”)被普遍视为汉语词语获得新义的重要途径,后者(“删略生义”)在文献中则鲜有提及。本文证明,汉语词义演变中真正“词义感染”的实例十分罕见,以往被认定为“词义感染”的实例,几乎均非“词义感染”的确凿例证,其中多数是“删略生义”,而后者实际上是人类语言获得新义的一种常见途径。ABSTRACT:In this paper, we discuss the process of two kinds of word meaning generating, namely “contagion” and “ellipsis”. The former (“contagion”) is generally regarded as an important way for Chinese words to acquire new meanings, while the latter (“ellipsis”) is rarely mentioned in the literature. This paper proves that the real cases of “contagion” in the evolution of Chinese word meaning are very rare, and most of the cases that have been identified as “contagion” in the past are not “contagion”, but “ellipsis”, which is actually a common way for human language to acquire new meaning.","PeriodicalId":44675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":"50 1","pages":"625 - 652"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"词义感染与删略生义\",\"authors\":\"福祥 吴\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jcl.2022.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"摘要:本文讨论两种词义衍生的过程,即“词义感染”和“删略生义”。前者(“词义感染”)被普遍视为汉语词语获得新义的重要途径,后者(“删略生义”)在文献中则鲜有提及。本文证明,汉语词义演变中真正“词义感染”的实例十分罕见,以往被认定为“词义感染”的实例,几乎均非“词义感染”的确凿例证,其中多数是“删略生义”,而后者实际上是人类语言获得新义的一种常见途径。ABSTRACT:In this paper, we discuss the process of two kinds of word meaning generating, namely “contagion” and “ellipsis”. The former (“contagion”) is generally regarded as an important way for Chinese words to acquire new meanings, while the latter (“ellipsis”) is rarely mentioned in the literature. This paper proves that the real cases of “contagion” in the evolution of Chinese word meaning are very rare, and most of the cases that have been identified as “contagion” in the past are not “contagion”, but “ellipsis”, which is actually a common way for human language to acquire new meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"625 - 652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2022.0024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2022.0024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文讨论两种词义衍生的过程,即“词义感染”和“删略生义”。前者(“词义感染”)被普遍视为汉语词语获得新义的重要途径,后者(“删略生义”)在文献中则鲜有提及。本文证明,汉语词义演变中真正“词义感染”的实例十分罕见,以往被认定为“词义感染”的实例,几乎均非“词义感染”的确凿例证,其中多数是“删略生义”,而后者实际上是人类语言获得新义的一种常见途径。ABSTRACT:In this paper, we discuss the process of two kinds of word meaning generating, namely “contagion” and “ellipsis”. The former (“contagion”) is generally regarded as an important way for Chinese words to acquire new meanings, while the latter (“ellipsis”) is rarely mentioned in the literature. This paper proves that the real cases of “contagion” in the evolution of Chinese word meaning are very rare, and most of the cases that have been identified as “contagion” in the past are not “contagion”, but “ellipsis”, which is actually a common way for human language to acquire new meaning.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
词义感染与删略生义
摘要:本文讨论两种词义衍生的过程,即“词义感染”和“删略生义”。前者(“词义感染”)被普遍视为汉语词语获得新义的重要途径,后者(“删略生义”)在文献中则鲜有提及。本文证明,汉语词义演变中真正“词义感染”的实例十分罕见,以往被认定为“词义感染”的实例,几乎均非“词义感染”的确凿例证,其中多数是“删略生义”,而后者实际上是人类语言获得新义的一种常见途径。ABSTRACT:In this paper, we discuss the process of two kinds of word meaning generating, namely “contagion” and “ellipsis”. The former (“contagion”) is generally regarded as an important way for Chinese words to acquire new meanings, while the latter (“ellipsis”) is rarely mentioned in the literature. This paper proves that the real cases of “contagion” in the evolution of Chinese word meaning are very rare, and most of the cases that have been identified as “contagion” in the past are not “contagion”, but “ellipsis”, which is actually a common way for human language to acquire new meaning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Chinese Linguistics (JCL) is an academic journal, which comprises research content from both general linguistics and Chinese linguistics. It is edited by a distinguished editorial board of international expertise. There are two publications: Journal of Chinese Linguistics (JCL) and Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series (JCLMS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信