S. Monier‐Dilhan, T. Poméon, Michael Böhm, R. Brečić, P. Csillag, M. Donati, Hugo Ferrer‐Pérez, L. Gauvrit, J. Gil, V. Hoang, Apichaya Lilavanichakul, E. Majewski, A. Malak-Rawlikowska, K. Mattas, O. Napasintuwong, A. Nguyễn, Kallirroi Nikolaou, I. Papadopoulos, S. Pascucci, J. Peerlings, B. Ristić, K. Steinnes, Žaklina Stojanović, M. Tomić Maksan, Á. Török, M. Veneziani, G. Vittersø, V. Bellassen
{"title":"食品质量计划和净价格溢价是否同时存在?","authors":"S. Monier‐Dilhan, T. Poméon, Michael Böhm, R. Brečić, P. Csillag, M. Donati, Hugo Ferrer‐Pérez, L. Gauvrit, J. Gil, V. Hoang, Apichaya Lilavanichakul, E. Majewski, A. Malak-Rawlikowska, K. Mattas, O. Napasintuwong, A. Nguyễn, Kallirroi Nikolaou, I. Papadopoulos, S. Pascucci, J. Peerlings, B. Ristić, K. Steinnes, Žaklina Stojanović, M. Tomić Maksan, Á. Török, M. Veneziani, G. Vittersø, V. Bellassen","doi":"10.1515/jafio-2019-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article addresses the issue of the profitability of Food Quality Scheme (FQS) products as compared to reference products, which are defined as analogous products without quality label. We approach this question by taking into account the level of the value chain (upstream, processing, and downstream), the sector (vegetal, animal, seafood) and the type of FQS (PGI, PDO, Organic). We collected original data for several products produced in selected European countries, as well as in Thailand and Vietnam. Comparisons depending on value chain level, sector and FQS are possible by using two comparable indicators: price premium and net price premium (including cost differential). The following principal conclusions were reached: 1) Price is higher for FQS products than for the reference products, regardless of the production level, the type of FQS or the sector; 2) Price premiums generated by FQS do not differ along the value chain, nor between sectors (vegetal, animal or seafood/fish); 3) Price premium for organic products is significantly higher than for PGI products, and this conclusion holds at upstream and processing levels, taking into account the costs directly related to production; 4) All organic products and almost all PDO and PGI products analysed benefit from a positive quality rent; 5) At upstream level and processing level, the relative weight of intermediate consumption in the cost structure is lower for organic products than for reference products.","PeriodicalId":52541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization","volume":"19 1","pages":"79 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jafio-2019-0044","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Food Quality Schemes and Net Price Premiums Go Together?\",\"authors\":\"S. Monier‐Dilhan, T. Poméon, Michael Böhm, R. Brečić, P. Csillag, M. Donati, Hugo Ferrer‐Pérez, L. Gauvrit, J. Gil, V. Hoang, Apichaya Lilavanichakul, E. Majewski, A. Malak-Rawlikowska, K. Mattas, O. Napasintuwong, A. Nguyễn, Kallirroi Nikolaou, I. Papadopoulos, S. Pascucci, J. Peerlings, B. Ristić, K. Steinnes, Žaklina Stojanović, M. Tomić Maksan, Á. Török, M. Veneziani, G. Vittersø, V. Bellassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jafio-2019-0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article addresses the issue of the profitability of Food Quality Scheme (FQS) products as compared to reference products, which are defined as analogous products without quality label. We approach this question by taking into account the level of the value chain (upstream, processing, and downstream), the sector (vegetal, animal, seafood) and the type of FQS (PGI, PDO, Organic). We collected original data for several products produced in selected European countries, as well as in Thailand and Vietnam. Comparisons depending on value chain level, sector and FQS are possible by using two comparable indicators: price premium and net price premium (including cost differential). The following principal conclusions were reached: 1) Price is higher for FQS products than for the reference products, regardless of the production level, the type of FQS or the sector; 2) Price premiums generated by FQS do not differ along the value chain, nor between sectors (vegetal, animal or seafood/fish); 3) Price premium for organic products is significantly higher than for PGI products, and this conclusion holds at upstream and processing levels, taking into account the costs directly related to production; 4) All organic products and almost all PDO and PGI products analysed benefit from a positive quality rent; 5) At upstream level and processing level, the relative weight of intermediate consumption in the cost structure is lower for organic products than for reference products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"79 - 94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jafio-2019-0044\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2019-0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2019-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do Food Quality Schemes and Net Price Premiums Go Together?
Abstract This article addresses the issue of the profitability of Food Quality Scheme (FQS) products as compared to reference products, which are defined as analogous products without quality label. We approach this question by taking into account the level of the value chain (upstream, processing, and downstream), the sector (vegetal, animal, seafood) and the type of FQS (PGI, PDO, Organic). We collected original data for several products produced in selected European countries, as well as in Thailand and Vietnam. Comparisons depending on value chain level, sector and FQS are possible by using two comparable indicators: price premium and net price premium (including cost differential). The following principal conclusions were reached: 1) Price is higher for FQS products than for the reference products, regardless of the production level, the type of FQS or the sector; 2) Price premiums generated by FQS do not differ along the value chain, nor between sectors (vegetal, animal or seafood/fish); 3) Price premium for organic products is significantly higher than for PGI products, and this conclusion holds at upstream and processing levels, taking into account the costs directly related to production; 4) All organic products and almost all PDO and PGI products analysed benefit from a positive quality rent; 5) At upstream level and processing level, the relative weight of intermediate consumption in the cost structure is lower for organic products than for reference products.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization (JAFIO) is a unique forum for empirical and theoretical research in industrial organization with a special focus on agricultural and food industries worldwide. As concentration, industrialization, and globalization continue to reshape horizontal and vertical relationships within the food supply chain, agricultural economists are revising both their views of traditional markets as well as their tools of analysis. At the core of this revision are strategic interactions between principals and agents, strategic interdependence between rival firms, and strategic trade policy between competing nations, all in a setting plagued by incomplete and/or imperfect information structures. Add to that biotechnology, electronic commerce, as well as the shift in focus from raw agricultural commodities to branded products, and the conclusion is that a "new" agricultural economics is needed for an increasingly complex "new" agriculture.