在全球流行病中提供法律协助死亡和安乐死服务:确保服务连续性的经验教训。

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Omega-Journal of Death and Dying Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-22 DOI:10.1177/00302228221089120
Pam Oliver, Michael Wilson, Cameron McLaren, Rob Jonquiere
{"title":"在全球流行病中提供法律协助死亡和安乐死服务:确保服务连续性的经验教训。","authors":"Pam Oliver, Michael Wilson, Cameron McLaren, Rob Jonquiere","doi":"10.1177/00302228221089120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background & objectives:</b> Identifying the impacts of COVID-19 on patients' and practitioners' access to legal assisted dying and euthanasia (AD&E) services is vital to informing service continuity in an ongoing pandemic.<b>Methods:</b> An anonymous online survey collected qualitative and quantitative data from health practitioners and agencies providing legal AD&E services (<i>n</i> = 89), complemented by semi-structured interviews with 18 survey respondents who volunteered.<b>Results:</b> Following governments' responses to the dynamic pandemic context, rates of AD&E inquiries and requests fluctuated across and within jurisdictions, based on a complex interaction of factors affecting patient access to AD&E agencies and assessors as services were disrupted. Service flexibility and nimbleness became key elements in continuing service availability and included calculated 'rule-breaking' considered justifiable to adhere to established bioethics. Making innovative adjustments to usual practice led to reviewing the effectiveness of AD&E services and laws, resulting in providers now improving services and lobbying for legislative change.</p>","PeriodicalId":47794,"journal":{"name":"Omega-Journal of Death and Dying","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Providing Legal Assisted Dying and Euthanasia Services in a Global Pandemic: Lessons for Ensuring Service Continuity.\",\"authors\":\"Pam Oliver, Michael Wilson, Cameron McLaren, Rob Jonquiere\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00302228221089120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background & objectives:</b> Identifying the impacts of COVID-19 on patients' and practitioners' access to legal assisted dying and euthanasia (AD&E) services is vital to informing service continuity in an ongoing pandemic.<b>Methods:</b> An anonymous online survey collected qualitative and quantitative data from health practitioners and agencies providing legal AD&E services (<i>n</i> = 89), complemented by semi-structured interviews with 18 survey respondents who volunteered.<b>Results:</b> Following governments' responses to the dynamic pandemic context, rates of AD&E inquiries and requests fluctuated across and within jurisdictions, based on a complex interaction of factors affecting patient access to AD&E agencies and assessors as services were disrupted. Service flexibility and nimbleness became key elements in continuing service availability and included calculated 'rule-breaking' considered justifiable to adhere to established bioethics. Making innovative adjustments to usual practice led to reviewing the effectiveness of AD&E services and laws, resulting in providers now improving services and lobbying for legislative change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-Journal of Death and Dying\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-Journal of Death and Dying\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221089120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/4/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-Journal of Death and Dying","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221089120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目标:确定COVID-19对患者和从业人员获得法律协助死亡和安乐死(AD&E)服务的影响,对于在持续的大流行中告知服务连续性至关重要。方法:一项匿名在线调查收集了来自卫生从业人员和提供法律AD&E服务的机构(n = 89)的定性和定量数据,并辅以对18名自愿调查对象的半结构化访谈。结果:在各国政府对动态大流行背景作出反应之后,由于服务中断,影响患者获得AD&E机构和评估人员服务的因素相互作用复杂,因此,AD&E查询和请求的比率在不同司法管辖区和辖区内波动。服务的灵活性和敏捷性成为持续服务可用性的关键因素,包括计算的“打破规则”,被认为是遵守既定生物伦理的正当理由。对常规做法进行创新调整,导致审查AD&E服务和法律的有效性,导致供应商现在改善服务并游说立法改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Providing Legal Assisted Dying and Euthanasia Services in a Global Pandemic: Lessons for Ensuring Service Continuity.

Background & objectives: Identifying the impacts of COVID-19 on patients' and practitioners' access to legal assisted dying and euthanasia (AD&E) services is vital to informing service continuity in an ongoing pandemic.Methods: An anonymous online survey collected qualitative and quantitative data from health practitioners and agencies providing legal AD&E services (n = 89), complemented by semi-structured interviews with 18 survey respondents who volunteered.Results: Following governments' responses to the dynamic pandemic context, rates of AD&E inquiries and requests fluctuated across and within jurisdictions, based on a complex interaction of factors affecting patient access to AD&E agencies and assessors as services were disrupted. Service flexibility and nimbleness became key elements in continuing service availability and included calculated 'rule-breaking' considered justifiable to adhere to established bioethics. Making innovative adjustments to usual practice led to reviewing the effectiveness of AD&E services and laws, resulting in providers now improving services and lobbying for legislative change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
259
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信