不可移动的目标:作为土著保护的缓解

C. Butler, B. Watkinson, James Witzke
{"title":"不可移动的目标:作为土著保护的缓解","authors":"C. Butler, B. Watkinson, James Witzke","doi":"10.1353/cla.2021.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:On the North Coast of British Columbia, First Nations face dozens of major industrial development proposals, including both crude oil and liquid natural gas pipelines and associated tanker traffic. In response to this overwhelming industrial expansion, First Nations have expanded their environmental stewardship programs to meaningfully engage in regulatory review, impacts research, and environmental monitoring. The Gitxaała First Nation provides an interesting case study of transforming such processes through integration of Gitxaała values into environmental assessment methodology and the application of Aboriginal rights and title. Protecting their territories against colonial intrusions and environmental change requires Gitxaała and their neighboring Nations to use Indigenous knowledge and collaborative governance institutions to limit and mitigate the impacts of these projects. For Indigenous societies under such extreme pressure, conservation is not only the achievement of higher or newer forms of protection, but simply maintaining the environmental status quo against encroaching industrial development. As other departments and programs engage in the selection of marine protected areas or developing conservancy management plans—recognizable conservation initiatives—in the face of rapid industrial development, the real frontline of Indigenous conservation can be considered engagement in regulatory review, the negotiation of impact benefit agreements, and long-term and cumulative effects monitoring. It is on the environmental assessment battleground that the unstoppable force of industrial development meets the immovable object of First Nations sovereignty and territorial protection, and where invisible but critical conservation wins are achieved.","PeriodicalId":88456,"journal":{"name":"Collaborative anthropologies","volume":"13 1","pages":"1 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/cla.2021.0001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Immovable Object: Mitigation as Indigenous Conservation\",\"authors\":\"C. Butler, B. Watkinson, James Witzke\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cla.2021.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:On the North Coast of British Columbia, First Nations face dozens of major industrial development proposals, including both crude oil and liquid natural gas pipelines and associated tanker traffic. In response to this overwhelming industrial expansion, First Nations have expanded their environmental stewardship programs to meaningfully engage in regulatory review, impacts research, and environmental monitoring. The Gitxaała First Nation provides an interesting case study of transforming such processes through integration of Gitxaała values into environmental assessment methodology and the application of Aboriginal rights and title. Protecting their territories against colonial intrusions and environmental change requires Gitxaała and their neighboring Nations to use Indigenous knowledge and collaborative governance institutions to limit and mitigate the impacts of these projects. For Indigenous societies under such extreme pressure, conservation is not only the achievement of higher or newer forms of protection, but simply maintaining the environmental status quo against encroaching industrial development. As other departments and programs engage in the selection of marine protected areas or developing conservancy management plans—recognizable conservation initiatives—in the face of rapid industrial development, the real frontline of Indigenous conservation can be considered engagement in regulatory review, the negotiation of impact benefit agreements, and long-term and cumulative effects monitoring. It is on the environmental assessment battleground that the unstoppable force of industrial development meets the immovable object of First Nations sovereignty and territorial protection, and where invisible but critical conservation wins are achieved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collaborative anthropologies\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/cla.2021.0001\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collaborative anthropologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.2021.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collaborative anthropologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.2021.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:在不列颠哥伦比亚省北部海岸,第一民族面临着数十项重大工业发展提案,包括原油和液化天然气管道以及相关的油轮交通。为了应对这种压倒性的工业扩张,原住民扩大了他们的环境管理项目,有意义地参与监管审查、影响研究和环境监测。Gitxaała第一民族提供了一个有趣的案例研究,通过将Gitxaała价值观纳入环境评估方法和土著权利和头衔的应用来改变这些过程。保护他们的领土不受殖民入侵和环境变化的影响,需要Gitxaała和他们的邻国利用土著知识和协作治理机构来限制和减轻这些项目的影响。对于处于这种极端压力下的土著社会来说,保护不仅仅是实现更高或更新形式的保护,而只是维持环境现状,不受工业发展的侵蚀。面对快速的工业发展,其他部门和项目参与海洋保护区的选择或制定保护管理计划——可识别的保护举措,土著保护的真正前线可以被视为参与监管审查,影响利益协议的谈判,以及长期和累积效果的监测。正是在环境评估的战场上,工业发展的不可阻挡的力量遇到了原住民主权和领土保护的不可动摇的目标,在这里,无形但至关重要的保护取得了胜利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Immovable Object: Mitigation as Indigenous Conservation
Abstract:On the North Coast of British Columbia, First Nations face dozens of major industrial development proposals, including both crude oil and liquid natural gas pipelines and associated tanker traffic. In response to this overwhelming industrial expansion, First Nations have expanded their environmental stewardship programs to meaningfully engage in regulatory review, impacts research, and environmental monitoring. The Gitxaała First Nation provides an interesting case study of transforming such processes through integration of Gitxaała values into environmental assessment methodology and the application of Aboriginal rights and title. Protecting their territories against colonial intrusions and environmental change requires Gitxaała and their neighboring Nations to use Indigenous knowledge and collaborative governance institutions to limit and mitigate the impacts of these projects. For Indigenous societies under such extreme pressure, conservation is not only the achievement of higher or newer forms of protection, but simply maintaining the environmental status quo against encroaching industrial development. As other departments and programs engage in the selection of marine protected areas or developing conservancy management plans—recognizable conservation initiatives—in the face of rapid industrial development, the real frontline of Indigenous conservation can be considered engagement in regulatory review, the negotiation of impact benefit agreements, and long-term and cumulative effects monitoring. It is on the environmental assessment battleground that the unstoppable force of industrial development meets the immovable object of First Nations sovereignty and territorial protection, and where invisible but critical conservation wins are achieved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信