主观权力动态在极右翼集体行动中的作用:“团结右翼”集会和国会大厦起义
IF 1.8
Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
引用次数: 0
摘要
极右翼的集体行动以前被解释为集体不满。然而，这并不能充分解释与群体相关的成功之后的动员。基于更广泛的集体行动文献，我们建议在集体行动之前和期间分析主观权力的经验可能会显著补充现有的极右翼动员的解释。我们使用了2017年夏洛茨维尔“团结右翼”集会和2021年华盛顿国会大厦起义的二手数据(主要是来自YouTube和ProPublica的视频)，定性地检验了与会者在多大程度上报告了集体心理赋权以及集体不满的感知。这些事件都与团结极右翼的努力联系在一起，但却受到不同的直接背景的影响。我们发现，在夏洛茨维尔，与会者已经感到被授权了，并从集会本身获得了进一步的授权。虽然国会起义似乎是由集体不满所驱动的，但也有一些迹象表明，权力体验主要来自事件本身。我们的分析对削弱极右翼集体行动的权力具有启示意义。本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
The role of subjective power dynamics in far-right collective action: The “Unite the Right” rally and the Capitol insurrection
Far-right collective action has previously been explained in terms of collective grievances. However, this does not adequately explain mobilisations after ingroup-relevant successes. Based on the broader collective action literature, we suggest that analysing experiences of subjective power before and during collective action may significantly complement existing explanations of far-right mobilisations. We used secondary data (predominantly videos from YouTube and ProPublica) from the 2017 Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally and the 2021 Washington Capitol insurrection to qualitatively examine the extent to which attendees reported experiencing collective psychological empowerment alongside the perception of collective grievances. The events were connected by the effort to unify the far-right yet were shaped by different immediate contexts. We find that at Charlottesville, attendees arrived already feeling empowered and gained further empowerment from the rally itself. While the Capitol insurrection seemed to be driven by collective grievances, there were some indicators of empowerment experiences mainly deriving from the event itself. Our analysis has implications for disempowering far-right collective action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
43
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Social and Political Psychology (JSPP) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal (without author fees), published online. It publishes articles at the intersection of social and political psychology that substantially advance the understanding of social problems, their reduction, and the promotion of social justice. It also welcomes work that focuses on socio-political issues from related fields of psychology (e.g., peace psychology, community psychology, cultural psychology, environmental psychology, media psychology, economic psychology) and encourages submissions with interdisciplinary perspectives. JSPP is comprehensive and integrative in its approach. It publishes high-quality work from different epistemological, methodological, theoretical, and cultural perspectives and from different regions across the globe. It provides a forum for innovation, questioning of assumptions, and controversy and debate. JSPP aims to give creative impetuses for academic scholarship and for applications in education, policymaking, professional practice, and advocacy and social action. It intends to transcend the methodological and meta-theoretical divisions and paradigm clashes that characterize the field of social and political psychology, and to counterbalance the current overreliance on the hypothetico-deductive model of science, quantitative methodology, and individualistic explanations by also publishing work following alternative traditions (e.g., qualitative and mixed-methods research, participatory action research, critical psychology, social representations, narrative, and discursive approaches). Because it is published online, JSPP can avoid a bias against research that requires more space to be presented adequately.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
