一般工作参与度和幸福感对假期效果和假期淡出的作用

IF 4.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Eva-Kristina Brosch, Carmen Binnewies, Christopher Gröning, Boris Forthmann
{"title":"一般工作参与度和幸福感对假期效果和假期淡出的作用","authors":"Eva-Kristina Brosch,&nbsp;Carmen Binnewies,&nbsp;Christopher Gröning,&nbsp;Boris Forthmann","doi":"10.1111/apps.12488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Our study examines individual differences in vacation-related well-being gains by investigating general work engagement and general well-being as moderators. We examined the effect of vacation on employees' affective well-being (negative activation and vigor) concerning three different vacation effects (change in affective well-being over time): “vacation effect (during)” (before-during vacation), “vacation effect (after)” (before-after vacation), and “fade-out effect” (during-after vacation). A sample of 144 employees completed at least four out of five questionnaires: general (4 weeks before), pre-vacation (3 days before), on-vacation, Post-1 (first day after), and Post-2 (2 weeks after). Regarding vacation effects, affective well-being was higher during and after vacation than before. After work resumed, gains in affective well-being faded out (Exception: Negative activation did not differ from its level during vacation). Work engagement moderated vacation effects (during) and fade-out effects: Employees with lower levels of work engagement benefitted more while on vacation but experienced a greater fade-out. Lower levels of general well-being were related to increases in affective well-being during and after vacation. Well-being did not moderate fade-out effects. Our findings underscore the importance of work engagement and general well-being for vacation-related well-being gains and the importance of work engagement for the sustainability of vacation effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":48289,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","volume":"73 2","pages":"509-539"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.12488","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of general work engagement and well-being for vacation effects and for vacation fade-out\",\"authors\":\"Eva-Kristina Brosch,&nbsp;Carmen Binnewies,&nbsp;Christopher Gröning,&nbsp;Boris Forthmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apps.12488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Our study examines individual differences in vacation-related well-being gains by investigating general work engagement and general well-being as moderators. We examined the effect of vacation on employees' affective well-being (negative activation and vigor) concerning three different vacation effects (change in affective well-being over time): “vacation effect (during)” (before-during vacation), “vacation effect (after)” (before-after vacation), and “fade-out effect” (during-after vacation). A sample of 144 employees completed at least four out of five questionnaires: general (4 weeks before), pre-vacation (3 days before), on-vacation, Post-1 (first day after), and Post-2 (2 weeks after). Regarding vacation effects, affective well-being was higher during and after vacation than before. After work resumed, gains in affective well-being faded out (Exception: Negative activation did not differ from its level during vacation). Work engagement moderated vacation effects (during) and fade-out effects: Employees with lower levels of work engagement benefitted more while on vacation but experienced a greater fade-out. Lower levels of general well-being were related to increases in affective well-being during and after vacation. Well-being did not moderate fade-out effects. Our findings underscore the importance of work engagement and general well-being for vacation-related well-being gains and the importance of work engagement for the sustainability of vacation effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale\",\"volume\":\"73 2\",\"pages\":\"509-539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apps.12488\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12488\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychology-An International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apps.12488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的研究通过调查作为调节因素的一般工作投入和一般幸福感,研究了与假期相关的幸福感收益的个体差异。我们研究了假期对员工情感幸福感(消极激活和活力)的影响,涉及三种不同的假期效应(情感幸福感随时间的变化):"假期效应(期间)"(假期前-假期期间)、"假期效应(假期后)"(假期前-假期后)和 "淡出效应"(假期期间-假期后)。144 名员工至少完成了五份问卷中的四份:一般问卷(休假前四周)、休假前问卷(休假前三天)、休假中问卷、休假后问卷(休假后第一天)和休假后问卷(休假后两周)。关于休假的影响,休假期间和休假后的情感幸福感高于休假前。恢复工作后,情感幸福感的提高逐渐减弱(例外情况):消极激活与休假期间的水平没有差异)。工作投入调节了休假效应(休假期间)和淡出效应:工作投入程度较低的员工在休假期间受益更多,但淡出效应更大。一般幸福感水平较低的员工在休假期间和休假后的情感幸福感增加。幸福感并不能调节淡出效应。我们的研究结果强调了工作投入和一般幸福感对于度假相关幸福感增加的重要性,以及工作投入对于度假效应持续性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The role of general work engagement and well-being for vacation effects and for vacation fade-out

The role of general work engagement and well-being for vacation effects and for vacation fade-out

Our study examines individual differences in vacation-related well-being gains by investigating general work engagement and general well-being as moderators. We examined the effect of vacation on employees' affective well-being (negative activation and vigor) concerning three different vacation effects (change in affective well-being over time): “vacation effect (during)” (before-during vacation), “vacation effect (after)” (before-after vacation), and “fade-out effect” (during-after vacation). A sample of 144 employees completed at least four out of five questionnaires: general (4 weeks before), pre-vacation (3 days before), on-vacation, Post-1 (first day after), and Post-2 (2 weeks after). Regarding vacation effects, affective well-being was higher during and after vacation than before. After work resumed, gains in affective well-being faded out (Exception: Negative activation did not differ from its level during vacation). Work engagement moderated vacation effects (during) and fade-out effects: Employees with lower levels of work engagement benefitted more while on vacation but experienced a greater fade-out. Lower levels of general well-being were related to increases in affective well-being during and after vacation. Well-being did not moderate fade-out effects. Our findings underscore the importance of work engagement and general well-being for vacation-related well-being gains and the importance of work engagement for the sustainability of vacation effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: "Applied Psychology: An International Review" is the esteemed official journal of the International Association of Applied Psychology (IAAP), a venerable organization established in 1920 that unites scholars and practitioners in the field of applied psychology. This peer-reviewed journal serves as a global platform for the scholarly exchange of research findings within the diverse domain of applied psychology. The journal embraces a wide array of topics within applied psychology, including organizational, cross-cultural, educational, health, counseling, environmental, traffic, and sport psychology. It particularly encourages submissions that enhance the understanding of psychological processes in various applied settings and studies that explore the impact of different national and cultural contexts on psychological phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信