Yang Yang, Stella Gryllia, Leticia Pablos, L. Cheng
{"title":"基于韵律的普通话从句类型预期","authors":"Yang Yang, Stella Gryllia, Leticia Pablos, L. Cheng","doi":"10.1075/IJCHL.18004.YAN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Mandarin wh-words such as shénme are wh-indeterminates, which\n can have interrogative interpretations (‘what’) or non-interrogative interpretations (i.e., ‘something’), depending on the context\n and licensors. For example, when diǎnr (‘a little’) appears right in front of a wh-word, the\n string can have either a wh-question or a declarative interpretation (henceforth,\n wh-declarative). Yang (2018) carried out a production study and the\n results showed that wh-questions and wh-declaratives have different prosodic properties. To\n investigate whether and when listeners make use of prosody to anticipate the clause type (i.e., question vs. declarative), we\n conducted a sentence perception study and an audio-gating experiment. Results of the perception study and the gating experiment\n show that (1) Participants can make use of prosody to differentiate the two clause types; (2) Starting from the onset of the first\n word of the target sentence (wh-question/wh-declarative), participants already demonstrate a\n preference for the clause type that was intended by the speaker. The current study also sheds light on the clausal typing\n mechanism in Mandarin (e.g., how to mark a clause as a wh-question) by providing evidence of the role of prosody\n in marking clause types in Mandarin.","PeriodicalId":41020,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clause type anticipation based on prosody in Mandarin\",\"authors\":\"Yang Yang, Stella Gryllia, Leticia Pablos, L. Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/IJCHL.18004.YAN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Mandarin wh-words such as shénme are wh-indeterminates, which\\n can have interrogative interpretations (‘what’) or non-interrogative interpretations (i.e., ‘something’), depending on the context\\n and licensors. For example, when diǎnr (‘a little’) appears right in front of a wh-word, the\\n string can have either a wh-question or a declarative interpretation (henceforth,\\n wh-declarative). Yang (2018) carried out a production study and the\\n results showed that wh-questions and wh-declaratives have different prosodic properties. To\\n investigate whether and when listeners make use of prosody to anticipate the clause type (i.e., question vs. declarative), we\\n conducted a sentence perception study and an audio-gating experiment. Results of the perception study and the gating experiment\\n show that (1) Participants can make use of prosody to differentiate the two clause types; (2) Starting from the onset of the first\\n word of the target sentence (wh-question/wh-declarative), participants already demonstrate a\\n preference for the clause type that was intended by the speaker. The current study also sheds light on the clausal typing\\n mechanism in Mandarin (e.g., how to mark a clause as a wh-question) by providing evidence of the role of prosody\\n in marking clause types in Mandarin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/IJCHL.18004.YAN\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/IJCHL.18004.YAN","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clause type anticipation based on prosody in Mandarin
Mandarin wh-words such as shénme are wh-indeterminates, which
can have interrogative interpretations (‘what’) or non-interrogative interpretations (i.e., ‘something’), depending on the context
and licensors. For example, when diǎnr (‘a little’) appears right in front of a wh-word, the
string can have either a wh-question or a declarative interpretation (henceforth,
wh-declarative). Yang (2018) carried out a production study and the
results showed that wh-questions and wh-declaratives have different prosodic properties. To
investigate whether and when listeners make use of prosody to anticipate the clause type (i.e., question vs. declarative), we
conducted a sentence perception study and an audio-gating experiment. Results of the perception study and the gating experiment
show that (1) Participants can make use of prosody to differentiate the two clause types; (2) Starting from the onset of the first
word of the target sentence (wh-question/wh-declarative), participants already demonstrate a
preference for the clause type that was intended by the speaker. The current study also sheds light on the clausal typing
mechanism in Mandarin (e.g., how to mark a clause as a wh-question) by providing evidence of the role of prosody
in marking clause types in Mandarin.