多元化婚姻:反对自由主义争论的批评者·全球之声

Kalimah Pub Date : 2018-09-04 DOI:10.21111/klm.v16i2.2874
Ilham Habibullah, Syamsul Hadi Untung
{"title":"多元化婚姻:反对自由主义争论的批评者·全球之声","authors":"Ilham Habibullah, Syamsul Hadi Untung","doi":"10.21111/klm.v16i2.2874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interreligious marriage, especially in Indonesia, could make, a hard polemic in a society . It, In a beginning, was a social issue. But, suddenly, become an intellectual one. This issue, ussualy, comes from intelectual liberal Muslim. They build, in understanding Islamic law, especialy in a interreligious marriage, a contextual approach. It, so that, makes a anthropocentric thought and disobeying a vallue, in Islamic worldview. Hence, I would, as a writter, review reductionic arguments of intelectual liberal Muslim which was justified as freedom of interreligious marriage. I will, to achieve it, refiew their argumen and explain their inconsistent  in istinba>t} al-ah}ka>m . The result of this is discovered that interreligious marriage is rulled by Muslim or man in Islam who marries a woman of ahl kitab which is leaned to Islam and good moral. And not in otherwise. And the other result of this is known that marriage of sahabat by woman of ahl al kitab is enticed to Islamic teaching. So that interreligious marriage in Islam is not, as it claimed by the liberal Muslim, an antroposentic view but it is valuable by Islamic worldview.","PeriodicalId":31048,"journal":{"name":"Kalimah","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pernikahan Beda Agama: Kritik terhadap Argumen Kaum Liberal\",\"authors\":\"Ilham Habibullah, Syamsul Hadi Untung\",\"doi\":\"10.21111/klm.v16i2.2874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interreligious marriage, especially in Indonesia, could make, a hard polemic in a society . It, In a beginning, was a social issue. But, suddenly, become an intellectual one. This issue, ussualy, comes from intelectual liberal Muslim. They build, in understanding Islamic law, especialy in a interreligious marriage, a contextual approach. It, so that, makes a anthropocentric thought and disobeying a vallue, in Islamic worldview. Hence, I would, as a writter, review reductionic arguments of intelectual liberal Muslim which was justified as freedom of interreligious marriage. I will, to achieve it, refiew their argumen and explain their inconsistent  in istinba>t} al-ah}ka>m . The result of this is discovered that interreligious marriage is rulled by Muslim or man in Islam who marries a woman of ahl kitab which is leaned to Islam and good moral. And not in otherwise. And the other result of this is known that marriage of sahabat by woman of ahl al kitab is enticed to Islamic teaching. So that interreligious marriage in Islam is not, as it claimed by the liberal Muslim, an antroposentic view but it is valuable by Islamic worldview.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kalimah\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kalimah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v16i2.2874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kalimah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v16i2.2874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

宗教间的婚姻,尤其是在印度尼西亚,可能会在一个社会中引发激烈的争论。一开始,这是一个社会问题。但是,突然间,变成了一个知识分子。这个问题,无疑来自于穆斯林的智慧自由主义。他们在理解伊斯兰法律,特别是在宗教间婚姻中,建立了一种语境方法。因此,它形成了一种以人类为中心的思想,违背了伊斯兰世界观中的价值观。因此,作为一名作家,我想回顾一下宗教自由穆斯林的简化论点,这被认为是宗教间婚姻的自由。为了实现这一点,我将重新审视他们的论点,并解释他们在istinba>t}al ah}ka>m中的不一致性。其结果是,宗教间的婚姻是由穆斯林或伊斯兰教中的男性主持的,他们嫁给了一个信奉伊斯兰教和良好道德的女人。而不是在其他方面。这件事的另一个结果是众所周知的,ahl al-kitab的女人与sahabat的婚姻受到了伊斯兰教义的诱惑。因此,伊斯兰教中的宗教间婚姻并不像自由派穆斯林所声称的那样是一种空洞的观点,但它在伊斯兰世界观中是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pernikahan Beda Agama: Kritik terhadap Argumen Kaum Liberal
Interreligious marriage, especially in Indonesia, could make, a hard polemic in a society . It, In a beginning, was a social issue. But, suddenly, become an intellectual one. This issue, ussualy, comes from intelectual liberal Muslim. They build, in understanding Islamic law, especialy in a interreligious marriage, a contextual approach. It, so that, makes a anthropocentric thought and disobeying a vallue, in Islamic worldview. Hence, I would, as a writter, review reductionic arguments of intelectual liberal Muslim which was justified as freedom of interreligious marriage. I will, to achieve it, refiew their argumen and explain their inconsistent  in istinba>t} al-ah}ka>m . The result of this is discovered that interreligious marriage is rulled by Muslim or man in Islam who marries a woman of ahl kitab which is leaned to Islam and good moral. And not in otherwise. And the other result of this is known that marriage of sahabat by woman of ahl al kitab is enticed to Islamic teaching. So that interreligious marriage in Islam is not, as it claimed by the liberal Muslim, an antroposentic view but it is valuable by Islamic worldview.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信