关于西塞罗的德多莫。近期工作综述

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Cédric Scheidegger-Lämmle
{"title":"关于西塞罗的德多莫。近期工作综述","authors":"Cédric Scheidegger-Lämmle","doi":"10.13135/2532-5353/2192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contribution offers a brief survey of research on De domo and locates it in the changing landscape of Ciceronian studies. After a consideration of the old debate on the speech’s authenticity, it identifies four dominant lines of inquiry in recent scholarship on De domo .  Il contributo offre una breve prospettiva di ricerca sul De domo di Cicerone, collocando l’orazione nel panorama in continua trasformazione degli studi ciceroniani. Dopo una riflessione sullo storico dibattito riguardante l’autenticita del dialogo, si identificano quattro campi di ricerca dominanti nella critica recente al De domo.","PeriodicalId":31844,"journal":{"name":"Ciceroniana On Line","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Cicero’s De domo. A survey of recent work\",\"authors\":\"Cédric Scheidegger-Lämmle\",\"doi\":\"10.13135/2532-5353/2192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The contribution offers a brief survey of research on De domo and locates it in the changing landscape of Ciceronian studies. After a consideration of the old debate on the speech’s authenticity, it identifies four dominant lines of inquiry in recent scholarship on De domo .  Il contributo offre una breve prospettiva di ricerca sul De domo di Cicerone, collocando l’orazione nel panorama in continua trasformazione degli studi ciceroniani. Dopo una riflessione sullo storico dibattito riguardante l’autenticita del dialogo, si identificano quattro campi di ricerca dominanti nella critica recente al De domo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciceroniana On Line\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciceroniana On Line\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13135/2532-5353/2192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciceroniana On Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13135/2532-5353/2192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章简要介绍了对德多莫的研究,以及它在西塞罗研究中不断变化的景观中的位置。在考虑了关于演讲真实性的旧争论后,它确定了最近关于德多莫的学术研究中的四条主要线索。这篇文章为西塞罗的《德多莫》研究提供了一个简要的视角,将祈祷置于西塞罗研究不断变化的景观中。在反思了关于对话真实性的历史争论之后,最近对德多莫的批评确定了四个主要的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Cicero’s De domo. A survey of recent work
The contribution offers a brief survey of research on De domo and locates it in the changing landscape of Ciceronian studies. After a consideration of the old debate on the speech’s authenticity, it identifies four dominant lines of inquiry in recent scholarship on De domo .  Il contributo offre una breve prospettiva di ricerca sul De domo di Cicerone, collocando l’orazione nel panorama in continua trasformazione degli studi ciceroniani. Dopo una riflessione sullo storico dibattito riguardante l’autenticita del dialogo, si identificano quattro campi di ricerca dominanti nella critica recente al De domo.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ciceroniana On Line
Ciceroniana On Line Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信