世俗与基督教性教育方法的多学科探讨

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Chong Ho Alex Yu, Hyun Seo Lee
{"title":"世俗与基督教性教育方法的多学科探讨","authors":"Chong Ho Alex Yu, Hyun Seo Lee","doi":"10.1080/10656219.2018.1442270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Secular scholars have criticized Christian education and counseling on sex as restrictive, ineffective, and outdated. The authors of the current study explored both common non-Christian and Christian approaches to human sexuality with reference to overarching domains of religion, philosophy, psychology, sociology, and anthropology. Secular approaches were classified as the inward approach, the spatial approach, and the temporal approach, whereas Christian approaches were categorized as the traditional and the modern perspectives. Although Christian faith can be signified as a protective factor against casual and risky sexual behaviors, traditional Christian values should be reevaluated in favor of comprehensive Christian approaches to sexuality, which embrace sexual desires as divine gifts for completeness of humanity.","PeriodicalId":38970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Christian Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10656219.2018.1442270","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multi-Disciplinary Inquiry of Secular and Christian Approaches to Sex Education\",\"authors\":\"Chong Ho Alex Yu, Hyun Seo Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10656219.2018.1442270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Secular scholars have criticized Christian education and counseling on sex as restrictive, ineffective, and outdated. The authors of the current study explored both common non-Christian and Christian approaches to human sexuality with reference to overarching domains of religion, philosophy, psychology, sociology, and anthropology. Secular approaches were classified as the inward approach, the spatial approach, and the temporal approach, whereas Christian approaches were categorized as the traditional and the modern perspectives. Although Christian faith can be signified as a protective factor against casual and risky sexual behaviors, traditional Christian values should be reevaluated in favor of comprehensive Christian approaches to sexuality, which embrace sexual desires as divine gifts for completeness of humanity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research on Christian Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10656219.2018.1442270\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research on Christian Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2018.1442270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Christian Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2018.1442270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世俗学者批评基督教关于性的教育和咨询是限制性的、无效的和过时的。当前研究的作者们从宗教、哲学、心理学、社会学和人类学的主要领域出发,探讨了非基督教和基督教对人类性行为的普遍看法。世俗视角分为内向视角、空间视角和时间视角,而基督教视角分为传统视角和现代视角。虽然基督教信仰可以被认为是防止随意和冒险的性行为的保护因素,但传统的基督教价值观应该被重新评估,以支持全面的基督教性取向,将性欲视为人类完整的神圣礼物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Multi-Disciplinary Inquiry of Secular and Christian Approaches to Sex Education
ABSTRACT Secular scholars have criticized Christian education and counseling on sex as restrictive, ineffective, and outdated. The authors of the current study explored both common non-Christian and Christian approaches to human sexuality with reference to overarching domains of religion, philosophy, psychology, sociology, and anthropology. Secular approaches were classified as the inward approach, the spatial approach, and the temporal approach, whereas Christian approaches were categorized as the traditional and the modern perspectives. Although Christian faith can be signified as a protective factor against casual and risky sexual behaviors, traditional Christian values should be reevaluated in favor of comprehensive Christian approaches to sexuality, which embrace sexual desires as divine gifts for completeness of humanity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research on Christian Education
Journal of Research on Christian Education Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research on Christian Education (JRCE) provides a vehicle for the scholarly interchange of research findings relative to every level of Christian education. Particular emphasis is given to Christian schooling within the Protestant tradition as well as to research findings from other traditions which have implications for such schools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信