牵引性脱发纤维化早期识别的组织病理学可靠性:与临床严重程度的相关性

IF 1.6 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatopathology Pub Date : 2019-06-26 DOI:10.1159/000500509
R. M. Ngwanya, H. Adeola, Renée A Beach, N. Gantsho, C. Walker, K. Pillay, R. Prokopetz, F. Gumedze, N. Khumalo
{"title":"牵引性脱发纤维化早期识别的组织病理学可靠性:与临床严重程度的相关性","authors":"R. M. Ngwanya, H. Adeola, Renée A Beach, N. Gantsho, C. Walker, K. Pillay, R. Prokopetz, F. Gumedze, N. Khumalo","doi":"10.1159/000500509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traction alopecia (TA) is hair loss caused by prolonged pulling or repetitive tension on scalp hair; it belongs to the biphasic group of primary alopecia. It is non-scarring, typically with preservation of follicular stem cells and the potential for regrowth of early lesions especially if traction hairstyles are stopped. However, the alopecia may become permanent (scarring) and fail to respond to treatment if the traction is excessive and prolonged. Hence, the ability to detect fibrosis early in these lesions could predict patients who respond to treatment. Histopathological diagnosis based on scalp biopsies has been used as a gold standard to delineate various forms of non-scarring alopecia and to differentiate them from scarring ones. However, due to potential discrepant reporting as a result of the type of biopsy, method of sectioning, and site of biopsy, histopathology often tends to be unreliable for the early recognition of fibrosis in TA. In this study, 45 patients were assessed using the marginal TA severity scoring system, and their biopsies (both longitudinal and transverse sections) were systematically assessed by three dermatopathologists, the aim being to correlate histopathological findings with clinical staging. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to determine the level of agreement between the assessors. We found poor agreement of the identification and grading of perifollicular and interfollicular fibrosis (0.55 [0.23–0.75] and 0.01 [2.20–0.41], respectively), and no correlation could be drawn with the clinical severity score. Better methods of diagnosis are needed for grading and for recognition of early fibrosis in TA.","PeriodicalId":42885,"journal":{"name":"Dermatopathology","volume":"6 1","pages":"170 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000500509","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Histopathology for the Early Recognition of Fibrosis in Traction Alopecia: Correlation with Clinical Severity\",\"authors\":\"R. M. Ngwanya, H. Adeola, Renée A Beach, N. Gantsho, C. Walker, K. Pillay, R. Prokopetz, F. Gumedze, N. Khumalo\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000500509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traction alopecia (TA) is hair loss caused by prolonged pulling or repetitive tension on scalp hair; it belongs to the biphasic group of primary alopecia. It is non-scarring, typically with preservation of follicular stem cells and the potential for regrowth of early lesions especially if traction hairstyles are stopped. However, the alopecia may become permanent (scarring) and fail to respond to treatment if the traction is excessive and prolonged. Hence, the ability to detect fibrosis early in these lesions could predict patients who respond to treatment. Histopathological diagnosis based on scalp biopsies has been used as a gold standard to delineate various forms of non-scarring alopecia and to differentiate them from scarring ones. However, due to potential discrepant reporting as a result of the type of biopsy, method of sectioning, and site of biopsy, histopathology often tends to be unreliable for the early recognition of fibrosis in TA. In this study, 45 patients were assessed using the marginal TA severity scoring system, and their biopsies (both longitudinal and transverse sections) were systematically assessed by three dermatopathologists, the aim being to correlate histopathological findings with clinical staging. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to determine the level of agreement between the assessors. We found poor agreement of the identification and grading of perifollicular and interfollicular fibrosis (0.55 [0.23–0.75] and 0.01 [2.20–0.41], respectively), and no correlation could be drawn with the clinical severity score. Better methods of diagnosis are needed for grading and for recognition of early fibrosis in TA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatopathology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"170 - 181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000500509\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000500509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000500509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

牵引性脱发(TA)是由于长时间拉扯或反复拉扯头皮头发而造成的脱发;它属于原发性脱发的双相组。它不会留下疤痕,通常保留了毛囊干细胞和早期病变再生的潜力,特别是如果停止牵引发型。然而,脱发可能成为永久性的(疤痕),如果牵引过度和延长治疗无效。因此,在这些病变中早期检测纤维化的能力可以预测患者对治疗的反应。基于头皮活检的组织病理学诊断已被用作描述各种形式的非瘢痕性脱发并将其与瘢痕性脱发区分开来的金标准。然而,由于活检类型、切片方法和活检位置的不同,组织病理学对TA纤维化的早期识别往往不可靠。在这项研究中,45名患者使用边缘TA严重程度评分系统进行评估,他们的活检(纵向和横切面)由三名皮肤病理学家系统评估,目的是将组织病理学结果与临床分期联系起来。使用类内相关系数来确定评估者之间的一致程度。我们发现对滤泡周围和滤泡间纤维化的识别和分级的一致性较差(分别为0.55[0.23-0.75]和0.01[2.20-0.41]),并且与临床严重程度评分没有相关性。需要更好的诊断方法来分级和识别TA的早期纤维化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of Histopathology for the Early Recognition of Fibrosis in Traction Alopecia: Correlation with Clinical Severity
Traction alopecia (TA) is hair loss caused by prolonged pulling or repetitive tension on scalp hair; it belongs to the biphasic group of primary alopecia. It is non-scarring, typically with preservation of follicular stem cells and the potential for regrowth of early lesions especially if traction hairstyles are stopped. However, the alopecia may become permanent (scarring) and fail to respond to treatment if the traction is excessive and prolonged. Hence, the ability to detect fibrosis early in these lesions could predict patients who respond to treatment. Histopathological diagnosis based on scalp biopsies has been used as a gold standard to delineate various forms of non-scarring alopecia and to differentiate them from scarring ones. However, due to potential discrepant reporting as a result of the type of biopsy, method of sectioning, and site of biopsy, histopathology often tends to be unreliable for the early recognition of fibrosis in TA. In this study, 45 patients were assessed using the marginal TA severity scoring system, and their biopsies (both longitudinal and transverse sections) were systematically assessed by three dermatopathologists, the aim being to correlate histopathological findings with clinical staging. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to determine the level of agreement between the assessors. We found poor agreement of the identification and grading of perifollicular and interfollicular fibrosis (0.55 [0.23–0.75] and 0.01 [2.20–0.41], respectively), and no correlation could be drawn with the clinical severity score. Better methods of diagnosis are needed for grading and for recognition of early fibrosis in TA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatopathology
Dermatopathology DERMATOLOGY-
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信