估算巴西圣保罗州上空每日大气柱平均CO2浓度的经验模型

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Luis Miguel da Costa, Gustavo André de Araújo Santos, Alan Rodrigo Panosso, Glauco de Souza Rolim, Newton La Scala
{"title":"估算巴西圣保罗州上空每日大气柱平均CO2浓度的经验模型","authors":"Luis Miguel da Costa,&nbsp;Gustavo André de Araújo Santos,&nbsp;Alan Rodrigo Panosso,&nbsp;Glauco de Souza Rolim,&nbsp;Newton La Scala","doi":"10.1186/s13021-022-00209-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The recent studies of the variations in the atmospheric column-averaged CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<span>\\({\\text{X}}_{{{\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\)</span>) above croplands and forests show a negative correlation between <span>\\({\\text{X}}_{{{\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\)</span>and Sun Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) and confirmed that photosynthesis is the main regulator of the terrestrial uptake for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>. The remote sensing techniques in this context are very important to observe this relation, however, there is still a time gap in orbital data, since the observation is not daily. Here we analyzed the effects of several variables related to the photosynthetic capacity of vegetation on <span>\\({\\text{X}}_{{{\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\)</span> above São Paulo state during the period from 2015 to 2019 and propose a daily model to estimate the natural changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The data retrieved from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), NASA-POWER and Application for Extracting and Exploring Analysis Ready Samples (AppEEARS) show that Global Radiation (Qg), Sun Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) and, Relative Humidity (RH) are the most significant factors for predicting the annual <span>\\({\\text{X}}_{{{\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\)</span> cycle. The daily model of <span>\\({\\text{X}}_{{{\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\)</span> estimated from Qg and RH predicts daily <span>\\({\\text{X}}_{{{\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\)</span> with root mean squared error of 0.47 ppm (the coefficient of determination is equal to 0.44, p &lt; 0.01).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The obtained results imply that a significant part of daily <span>\\({\\text{X}}_{{{\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\)</span> variations could be explained by meteorological factors and that further research should be done to quantify the effects of the atmospheric transport and anthropogenic emissions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":505,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Balance and Management","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13021-022-00209-7","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical model for estimating daily atmospheric column-averaged CO2 concentration above São Paulo state, Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Luis Miguel da Costa,&nbsp;Gustavo André de Araújo Santos,&nbsp;Alan Rodrigo Panosso,&nbsp;Glauco de Souza Rolim,&nbsp;Newton La Scala\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13021-022-00209-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The recent studies of the variations in the atmospheric column-averaged CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<span>\\\\({\\\\text{X}}_{{{\\\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\\\)</span>) above croplands and forests show a negative correlation between <span>\\\\({\\\\text{X}}_{{{\\\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\\\)</span>and Sun Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) and confirmed that photosynthesis is the main regulator of the terrestrial uptake for atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>. The remote sensing techniques in this context are very important to observe this relation, however, there is still a time gap in orbital data, since the observation is not daily. Here we analyzed the effects of several variables related to the photosynthetic capacity of vegetation on <span>\\\\({\\\\text{X}}_{{{\\\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\\\)</span> above São Paulo state during the period from 2015 to 2019 and propose a daily model to estimate the natural changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The data retrieved from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), NASA-POWER and Application for Extracting and Exploring Analysis Ready Samples (AppEEARS) show that Global Radiation (Qg), Sun Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) and, Relative Humidity (RH) are the most significant factors for predicting the annual <span>\\\\({\\\\text{X}}_{{{\\\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\\\)</span> cycle. The daily model of <span>\\\\({\\\\text{X}}_{{{\\\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\\\)</span> estimated from Qg and RH predicts daily <span>\\\\({\\\\text{X}}_{{{\\\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\\\)</span> with root mean squared error of 0.47 ppm (the coefficient of determination is equal to 0.44, p &lt; 0.01).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The obtained results imply that a significant part of daily <span>\\\\({\\\\text{X}}_{{{\\\\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\\\\)</span> variations could be explained by meteorological factors and that further research should be done to quantify the effects of the atmospheric transport and anthropogenic emissions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carbon Balance and Management\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://cbmjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13021-022-00209-7\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carbon Balance and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-022-00209-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Balance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13021-022-00209-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近对农田和森林上空大气柱平均CO2浓度(\({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\))变化的研究表明\({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\)与太阳诱导的叶绿素荧光(SIF)呈负相关,并证实光合作用是陆地吸收大气CO2的主要调节因子。在这种情况下,遥感技术对于观察这种关系是非常重要的,但是,轨道数据仍然存在时间差距,因为观测不是每天进行的。在此,我们分析了2015年至2019年期间与圣保罗州\({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\)以上植被光合能力相关的几个变量的影响,并提出了一个估算大气CO2自然变化的日模型。结果轨道碳观测站-2 (OCO-2)、NASA-POWER和用于提取和探索分析准备样品(AppEEARS)的数据表明,全球辐射(Qg)、太阳诱导叶绿素荧光(SIF)和相对湿度(RH)是预测年\({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\)周期的最重要因素。由Qg和RH估计的\({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\)日模型预测每日\({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\)的均方根误差为0.47 ppm(决定系数等于0.44,p &lt; 0.01)。结论\({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\)的日变化有很大一部分可以用气象因子来解释,应进一步研究大气输送和人为排放的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An empirical model for estimating daily atmospheric column-averaged CO2 concentration above São Paulo state, Brazil

Background

The recent studies of the variations in the atmospheric column-averaged CO2 concentration (\({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\)) above croplands and forests show a negative correlation between \({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\)and Sun Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) and confirmed that photosynthesis is the main regulator of the terrestrial uptake for atmospheric CO2. The remote sensing techniques in this context are very important to observe this relation, however, there is still a time gap in orbital data, since the observation is not daily. Here we analyzed the effects of several variables related to the photosynthetic capacity of vegetation on \({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\) above São Paulo state during the period from 2015 to 2019 and propose a daily model to estimate the natural changes in atmospheric CO2.

Results

The data retrieved from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2), NASA-POWER and Application for Extracting and Exploring Analysis Ready Samples (AppEEARS) show that Global Radiation (Qg), Sun Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) and, Relative Humidity (RH) are the most significant factors for predicting the annual \({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\) cycle. The daily model of \({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\) estimated from Qg and RH predicts daily \({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\) with root mean squared error of 0.47 ppm (the coefficient of determination is equal to 0.44, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The obtained results imply that a significant part of daily \({\text{X}}_{{{\text{CO}}_{{2}} }}\) variations could be explained by meteorological factors and that further research should be done to quantify the effects of the atmospheric transport and anthropogenic emissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon Balance and Management
Carbon Balance and Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Carbon Balance and Management is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of research aimed at developing a comprehensive policy relevant to the understanding of the global carbon cycle. The global carbon cycle involves important couplings between climate, atmospheric CO2 and the terrestrial and oceanic biospheres. The current transformation of the carbon cycle due to changes in climate and atmospheric composition is widely recognized as potentially dangerous for the biosphere and for the well-being of humankind, and therefore monitoring, understanding and predicting the evolution of the carbon cycle in the context of the whole biosphere (both terrestrial and marine) is a challenge to the scientific community. This demands interdisciplinary research and new approaches for studying geographical and temporal distributions of carbon pools and fluxes, control and feedback mechanisms of the carbon-climate system, points of intervention and windows of opportunity for managing the carbon-climate-human system. Carbon Balance and Management is a medium for researchers in the field to convey the results of their research across disciplinary boundaries. Through this dissemination of research, the journal aims to support the work of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) and to provide governmental and non-governmental organizations with instantaneous access to continually emerging knowledge, including paradigm shifts and consensual views.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信