Rett综合征患者的睡眠问题:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

Karen Spruyt
{"title":"Rett综合征患者的睡眠问题:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Karen Spruyt","doi":"10.1016/j.sleepe.2022.100027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Importance</h3><p>Prognosis and understanding of sleep disorders in rare genetic syndromes is limited, despite being a common complaint of caregivers. Rett Syndrome (RTT) is a rare, progressive neurodevelopmental disorder with problematic sleeping being a clinical feature yet inconsistencies exist in the literature.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the strength of evidence of a sleep disorder in RTT. To investigate the complaints reported based on a sleep disorders classification approach and to determine differences in rates per the RTT main clinical features.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Ebsco, Scopus, and Cochrane Library up to November 4<sup>th</sup> 2021 with no time or language limitation (CRD 42020198099) were searched.</p></div><div><h3>Study selection</h3><p>Original research published in peer-reviewed journals, with RTT clinical or genetic diagnosis reported and stating a sleep complaint with prevalence rate, were selected.</p></div><div><h3>Data Extraction and Synthesis</h3><p>We followed the PRISMA guideline for abstracting data and assessed risk of bias with the NIH quality assessment tools. The prevalence rates were meta-analyzed applying the mixed-effects model with measures of consistency.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)</h3><p>The International Classification of Sleep Disorders was used to summarize sleep complaints reported in the literature. Those that did not specify the precise sleep complaint were categorized as a not otherwise specified sleep problem. We further analyzed data per available RTT characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 19 studies (<em>n</em> = 4298, 0.3 to 57.2 years old) across five countries involving predominantly observational study designs. Overall, 54.1% (95%CI: 43.8% to 64.5%) of individuals with RTT exhibit problematic sleeping, in particular, excessive somnolence (67.5%; 95%CI: 47.5% to 82.7%) and difficulties initiating and maintaining sleep (61%; 95%CI: 49.6% to 71.4%). Disturbed sleep not otherwise specified was reported in 57.1% (95%CI: 34.5% to 81.3%). Although studies could improve details reported, females with <em>MECP2</em>-RTT showed a higher prevalence rate of excessive somnolence and sleep-wake transition disorders than those diagnosed by <em>CDKL5</em>-RTT. <strong>P</strong>revalence rates remain roughly unaltered across the lifespan. Sleep disorders are about two times more prevalent than in typically developing children.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3><p>Findings indicate predominantly disorders regarding maintenance of sleep and wake state, which persist throughout their lifespan. Improved reporting of clinical features in cases with RTT phenotypes and of sleep behavior frequency and severity may lead to explicit prevalence rates. This is fundamental to progress in the pathophysiological investigation of altered sleep-wake mechanisms and to implement tailored sleep interventions for individuals with RTT, and families.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74809,"journal":{"name":"Sleep epidemiology","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100027"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667343622000087/pdfft?md5=9201fc265368ab88dbc58dc7b378d374&pid=1-s2.0-S2667343622000087-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sleep problems in individuals with Rett Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Karen Spruyt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sleepe.2022.100027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Importance</h3><p>Prognosis and understanding of sleep disorders in rare genetic syndromes is limited, despite being a common complaint of caregivers. Rett Syndrome (RTT) is a rare, progressive neurodevelopmental disorder with problematic sleeping being a clinical feature yet inconsistencies exist in the literature.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the strength of evidence of a sleep disorder in RTT. To investigate the complaints reported based on a sleep disorders classification approach and to determine differences in rates per the RTT main clinical features.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Ebsco, Scopus, and Cochrane Library up to November 4<sup>th</sup> 2021 with no time or language limitation (CRD 42020198099) were searched.</p></div><div><h3>Study selection</h3><p>Original research published in peer-reviewed journals, with RTT clinical or genetic diagnosis reported and stating a sleep complaint with prevalence rate, were selected.</p></div><div><h3>Data Extraction and Synthesis</h3><p>We followed the PRISMA guideline for abstracting data and assessed risk of bias with the NIH quality assessment tools. The prevalence rates were meta-analyzed applying the mixed-effects model with measures of consistency.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)</h3><p>The International Classification of Sleep Disorders was used to summarize sleep complaints reported in the literature. Those that did not specify the precise sleep complaint were categorized as a not otherwise specified sleep problem. We further analyzed data per available RTT characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 19 studies (<em>n</em> = 4298, 0.3 to 57.2 years old) across five countries involving predominantly observational study designs. Overall, 54.1% (95%CI: 43.8% to 64.5%) of individuals with RTT exhibit problematic sleeping, in particular, excessive somnolence (67.5%; 95%CI: 47.5% to 82.7%) and difficulties initiating and maintaining sleep (61%; 95%CI: 49.6% to 71.4%). Disturbed sleep not otherwise specified was reported in 57.1% (95%CI: 34.5% to 81.3%). Although studies could improve details reported, females with <em>MECP2</em>-RTT showed a higher prevalence rate of excessive somnolence and sleep-wake transition disorders than those diagnosed by <em>CDKL5</em>-RTT. <strong>P</strong>revalence rates remain roughly unaltered across the lifespan. Sleep disorders are about two times more prevalent than in typically developing children.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3><p>Findings indicate predominantly disorders regarding maintenance of sleep and wake state, which persist throughout their lifespan. Improved reporting of clinical features in cases with RTT phenotypes and of sleep behavior frequency and severity may lead to explicit prevalence rates. This is fundamental to progress in the pathophysiological investigation of altered sleep-wake mechanisms and to implement tailored sleep interventions for individuals with RTT, and families.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667343622000087/pdfft?md5=9201fc265368ab88dbc58dc7b378d374&pid=1-s2.0-S2667343622000087-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667343622000087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667343622000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

重要性睡眠障碍在罕见遗传综合征中的预后和理解是有限的,尽管这是护理人员的常见抱怨。Rett综合征(RTT)是一种罕见的进行性神经发育障碍,以睡眠问题为临床特征,但文献中存在不一致的说法。目的探讨RTT中存在睡眠障碍的证据强度。调查基于睡眠障碍分类方法报告的投诉,并确定RTT主要临床特征的发病率差异。检索了pubmed、Web of Science、PsycINFO、Ebsco、Scopus和Cochrane Library截至2021年11月4日的无时间和语言限制的数据源(CRD 42020198099)。研究选择在同行评议的期刊上发表的原创研究,报告了RTT临床或基因诊断,并说明了睡眠抱怨的患病率。数据提取和综合我们遵循PRISMA指南提取数据,并使用NIH质量评估工具评估偏倚风险。采用混合效应模型对患病率进行meta分析,并测量一致性。主要结局和测量方法采用《国际睡眠障碍分类》对文献中报告的睡眠投诉进行总结。那些没有明确指出睡眠问题的人被归类为没有明确指出的睡眠问题。我们进一步分析了每个可用RTT特征的数据。我们纳入了来自5个国家的19项研究(n = 4298,年龄在0.3至57.2岁之间),主要涉及观察性研究设计。总体而言,54.1% (95%CI: 43.8%至64.5%)的RTT患者表现出睡眠问题,特别是过度嗜睡(67.5%;95%置信区间:47.5% ~ 82.7%)和入睡和维持睡眠困难(61%;95%CI: 49.6% ~ 71.4%)。有57.1%的人报告了未另行说明的睡眠障碍(95%CI: 34.5%至81.3%)。尽管研究可以改善报道的细节,但MECP2-RTT的女性比CDKL5-RTT诊断的女性表现出更高的嗜睡和睡眠-觉醒转换障碍的患病率。在整个生命周期中,患病率大致保持不变。睡眠障碍的发病率是正常发育儿童的两倍。结论和相关性研究结果表明,睡眠和清醒状态的维持障碍主要存在于他们的一生中。改善RTT表型病例的临床特征报告以及睡眠行为的频率和严重程度可能导致明确的患病率。这是对改变睡眠-觉醒机制的病理生理学研究取得进展的基础,也是为RTT患者及其家庭实施量身定制的睡眠干预的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sleep problems in individuals with Rett Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Importance

Prognosis and understanding of sleep disorders in rare genetic syndromes is limited, despite being a common complaint of caregivers. Rett Syndrome (RTT) is a rare, progressive neurodevelopmental disorder with problematic sleeping being a clinical feature yet inconsistencies exist in the literature.

Objective

To examine the strength of evidence of a sleep disorder in RTT. To investigate the complaints reported based on a sleep disorders classification approach and to determine differences in rates per the RTT main clinical features.

Data sources

PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Ebsco, Scopus, and Cochrane Library up to November 4th 2021 with no time or language limitation (CRD 42020198099) were searched.

Study selection

Original research published in peer-reviewed journals, with RTT clinical or genetic diagnosis reported and stating a sleep complaint with prevalence rate, were selected.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

We followed the PRISMA guideline for abstracting data and assessed risk of bias with the NIH quality assessment tools. The prevalence rates were meta-analyzed applying the mixed-effects model with measures of consistency.

Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)

The International Classification of Sleep Disorders was used to summarize sleep complaints reported in the literature. Those that did not specify the precise sleep complaint were categorized as a not otherwise specified sleep problem. We further analyzed data per available RTT characteristics.

Results

We included 19 studies (n = 4298, 0.3 to 57.2 years old) across five countries involving predominantly observational study designs. Overall, 54.1% (95%CI: 43.8% to 64.5%) of individuals with RTT exhibit problematic sleeping, in particular, excessive somnolence (67.5%; 95%CI: 47.5% to 82.7%) and difficulties initiating and maintaining sleep (61%; 95%CI: 49.6% to 71.4%). Disturbed sleep not otherwise specified was reported in 57.1% (95%CI: 34.5% to 81.3%). Although studies could improve details reported, females with MECP2-RTT showed a higher prevalence rate of excessive somnolence and sleep-wake transition disorders than those diagnosed by CDKL5-RTT. Prevalence rates remain roughly unaltered across the lifespan. Sleep disorders are about two times more prevalent than in typically developing children.

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings indicate predominantly disorders regarding maintenance of sleep and wake state, which persist throughout their lifespan. Improved reporting of clinical features in cases with RTT phenotypes and of sleep behavior frequency and severity may lead to explicit prevalence rates. This is fundamental to progress in the pathophysiological investigation of altered sleep-wake mechanisms and to implement tailored sleep interventions for individuals with RTT, and families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep epidemiology
Sleep epidemiology Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Clinical Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信