埃及2型糖尿病初级保健患者治疗满意度和医生信任与血糖控制的关系

IF 1.3 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetology International Pub Date : 2023-08-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s13340-023-00653-x
Hazem A Sayed Ahmed, Nada Emad Abdelsalam, Anwar I Joudeh, Ahmed Gharib Abdelrahman, Nahed Amen Eldahshan
{"title":"埃及2型糖尿病初级保健患者治疗满意度和医生信任与血糖控制的关系","authors":"Hazem A Sayed Ahmed, Nada Emad Abdelsalam, Anwar I Joudeh, Ahmed Gharib Abdelrahman, Nahed Amen Eldahshan","doi":"10.1007/s13340-023-00653-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the association of diabetes treatment satisfaction and trust in family physicians with glycemic control among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study on 319 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from five primary healthcare centers in Egypt. Data were collected from February to August 2021 using a structured questionnaire that contained six parts: sociodemographic data, disease profile, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), self-reported medication knowledge questionnaire (MKQ), and revised healthcare relationship trust scale (HCR). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess predictors of treatment satisfaction, physician trust, and HbA1c level. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 59.66 years (± 7.87 years) and 55.17% were females. Multiple linear regression analysis for predicting HbA1c showed that HbA1c level was lower in patients with higher treatment satisfaction scores (β =  - 0.289, p < 0.001) and higher medication adherence scores (β =  - 0.198, p = 0.001). Treatment satisfaction scores were positively predicted by higher physician trust scores (β = 0.301, p < 0.001), increased medication adherence scores (β = 0.160, p = 0.002), and longer duration of diabetes (β = 0.226, p < 0.001). Positive predictors for physician trust included HbA1c level (β = 0.141, p = 0.012), medication knowledge (β = 0.280, p < 0.001), diabetes treatment satisfaction (β = 0.366, p < 0.001) and medication adherence (β = 0.146, p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimizing diabetes treatment satisfaction and physician trust could have favorable associations with medication adherence and medication knowledge with a possible improvement in glycemic control. Family physicians should incorporate patients reported outcomes alongside traditional clinical measures in evaluating diabetes management in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11340,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10800317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of treatment satisfaction and physician trust with glycemic control among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes in Egypt.\",\"authors\":\"Hazem A Sayed Ahmed, Nada Emad Abdelsalam, Anwar I Joudeh, Ahmed Gharib Abdelrahman, Nahed Amen Eldahshan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13340-023-00653-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the association of diabetes treatment satisfaction and trust in family physicians with glycemic control among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study on 319 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from five primary healthcare centers in Egypt. Data were collected from February to August 2021 using a structured questionnaire that contained six parts: sociodemographic data, disease profile, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), self-reported medication knowledge questionnaire (MKQ), and revised healthcare relationship trust scale (HCR). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess predictors of treatment satisfaction, physician trust, and HbA1c level. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 59.66 years (± 7.87 years) and 55.17% were females. Multiple linear regression analysis for predicting HbA1c showed that HbA1c level was lower in patients with higher treatment satisfaction scores (β =  - 0.289, p < 0.001) and higher medication adherence scores (β =  - 0.198, p = 0.001). Treatment satisfaction scores were positively predicted by higher physician trust scores (β = 0.301, p < 0.001), increased medication adherence scores (β = 0.160, p = 0.002), and longer duration of diabetes (β = 0.226, p < 0.001). Positive predictors for physician trust included HbA1c level (β = 0.141, p = 0.012), medication knowledge (β = 0.280, p < 0.001), diabetes treatment satisfaction (β = 0.366, p < 0.001) and medication adherence (β = 0.146, p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimizing diabetes treatment satisfaction and physician trust could have favorable associations with medication adherence and medication knowledge with a possible improvement in glycemic control. Family physicians should incorporate patients reported outcomes alongside traditional clinical measures in evaluating diabetes management in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10800317/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-023-00653-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-023-00653-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估基层医疗机构 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病治疗满意度和对家庭医生的信任度与血糖控制的关系:方法:横断面研究,对象为来自埃及五个初级保健中心的 319 名 2 型糖尿病患者。数据收集时间为 2021 年 2 月至 8 月,采用的结构化问卷包含六个部分:社会人口学数据、疾病概况、糖尿病治疗满意度问卷 (DTSQ)、8 项莫里斯基用药依从性量表 (MMAS-8)、自我报告用药知识问卷 (MKQ) 和修订版医护关系信任量表 (HCR)。多元线性回归分析用于评估治疗满意度、医生信任度和 HbA1c 水平的预测因素。P值小于0.05为显著:平均年龄为 59.66 岁(± 7.87 岁),55.17% 为女性。预测 HbA1c 的多元线性回归分析表明,治疗满意度得分越高的患者 HbA1c 水平越低(β = - 0.289,P 结论:治疗满意度得分越高的患者 HbA1c 水平越低:优化糖尿病治疗满意度和医生信任度可与用药依从性和用药知识产生有利关联,从而改善血糖控制。家庭医生在评估初级保健中的糖尿病管理时,应将患者报告的结果与传统的临床措施结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of treatment satisfaction and physician trust with glycemic control among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes in Egypt.

Objectives: To evaluate the association of diabetes treatment satisfaction and trust in family physicians with glycemic control among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods: A cross-sectional study on 319 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from five primary healthcare centers in Egypt. Data were collected from February to August 2021 using a structured questionnaire that contained six parts: sociodemographic data, disease profile, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), self-reported medication knowledge questionnaire (MKQ), and revised healthcare relationship trust scale (HCR). Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess predictors of treatment satisfaction, physician trust, and HbA1c level. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results: The mean age was 59.66 years (± 7.87 years) and 55.17% were females. Multiple linear regression analysis for predicting HbA1c showed that HbA1c level was lower in patients with higher treatment satisfaction scores (β =  - 0.289, p < 0.001) and higher medication adherence scores (β =  - 0.198, p = 0.001). Treatment satisfaction scores were positively predicted by higher physician trust scores (β = 0.301, p < 0.001), increased medication adherence scores (β = 0.160, p = 0.002), and longer duration of diabetes (β = 0.226, p < 0.001). Positive predictors for physician trust included HbA1c level (β = 0.141, p = 0.012), medication knowledge (β = 0.280, p < 0.001), diabetes treatment satisfaction (β = 0.366, p < 0.001) and medication adherence (β = 0.146, p = 0.011).

Conclusion: Optimizing diabetes treatment satisfaction and physician trust could have favorable associations with medication adherence and medication knowledge with a possible improvement in glycemic control. Family physicians should incorporate patients reported outcomes alongside traditional clinical measures in evaluating diabetes management in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetology International
Diabetology International ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Diabetology International, the official journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, publishes original research articles about experimental research and clinical studies in diabetes and related areas. The journal also presents editorials, reviews, commentaries, reports of expert committees, and case reports on any aspect of diabetes. Diabetology International welcomes submissions from researchers, clinicians, and health professionals throughout the world who are interested in research, treatment, and care of patients with diabetes. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed to assure that high-quality information in the field of diabetes is made available to readers. Manuscripts are reviewed with due respect for the author''s confidentiality. At the same time, reviewers also have rights to confidentiality, which are respected by the editors. The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信