使用者的行为意向与行为——共享步道“左行”标线研究前后

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Maohao Che , Yiik Diew Wong , Kit Meng Lum , Maria Cecilia Rojas Lopez
{"title":"使用者的行为意向与行为——共享步道“左行”标线研究前后","authors":"Maohao Che ,&nbsp;Yiik Diew Wong ,&nbsp;Kit Meng Lum ,&nbsp;Maria Cecilia Rojas Lopez","doi":"10.1080/15568318.2021.2015494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The intention-behavior relationship is examined in a keep-left experiment involving interactions of pedestrians and cyclists on a shared footpath in Singapore as a case study. Data collection entailed before-and-after on-site perception surveys and naturalistic observations from field-recorded video footages. The perception surveys involved 120 pedestrians and 119 cyclists in the before period, and 59 pedestrians and 60 cyclists in the after period. Movement profiles were captured for 303 pedestrians, 148 cyclists, and 90 pedestrian-cyclist interactions for the before period, and 262, 174, and 76, respectively for the after period. The findings suggest that the “keep left” markings on the footpath are generally effective in improving users’ behavioral intention in keeping left. However, whereas cyclists did change their behavior, pedestrians did not do so which is rationalized as being due to their previously formed habit. The findings reveal a weak intention-behavior relationship for pedestrians’ habitual behavior. As consistent with the unchanged pedestrians’ behavior, no distinct changes in the pedestrian-cyclist interaction patterns were observed after the “keep left” treatment. There was no significant change in the perceived conflict level and the safety level as well.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47824,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Users’ behavioral intention and their behavior: before-and-after study of “keep left” markings on shared footpaths\",\"authors\":\"Maohao Che ,&nbsp;Yiik Diew Wong ,&nbsp;Kit Meng Lum ,&nbsp;Maria Cecilia Rojas Lopez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15568318.2021.2015494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The intention-behavior relationship is examined in a keep-left experiment involving interactions of pedestrians and cyclists on a shared footpath in Singapore as a case study. Data collection entailed before-and-after on-site perception surveys and naturalistic observations from field-recorded video footages. The perception surveys involved 120 pedestrians and 119 cyclists in the before period, and 59 pedestrians and 60 cyclists in the after period. Movement profiles were captured for 303 pedestrians, 148 cyclists, and 90 pedestrian-cyclist interactions for the before period, and 262, 174, and 76, respectively for the after period. The findings suggest that the “keep left” markings on the footpath are generally effective in improving users’ behavioral intention in keeping left. However, whereas cyclists did change their behavior, pedestrians did not do so which is rationalized as being due to their previously formed habit. The findings reveal a weak intention-behavior relationship for pedestrians’ habitual behavior. As consistent with the unchanged pedestrians’ behavior, no distinct changes in the pedestrian-cyclist interaction patterns were observed after the “keep left” treatment. There was no significant change in the perceived conflict level and the safety level as well.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1556831822001034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1556831822001034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要以新加坡一条共享人行道上行人和骑自行车的人的互动为例,研究了意向-行为关系。数据收集需要在现场感知调查前后进行,并从现场录制的视频片段中进行自然主义观察。认知调查前一阶段涉及120名行人和119名骑自行车的人,后一阶段涉及59名行人和60名骑自行车者。在前一段时间内,分别为303名行人、148名骑自行车的人和90名行人与自行车的互动,以及在后一段时间分别为262、174和76。研究结果表明,人行道上的“保持左侧”标记通常能有效提高使用者保持左侧的行为意向。然而,尽管骑自行车的人确实改变了他们的行为,但行人没有这样做,这被合理化为是因为他们以前养成的习惯。研究结果表明,行人习惯行为的意向-行为关系较弱。与不变的行人行为一致,“保持左侧”处理后,行人与自行车的互动模式没有明显变化。感知到的冲突水平和安全水平也没有显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Users’ behavioral intention and their behavior: before-and-after study of “keep left” markings on shared footpaths

The intention-behavior relationship is examined in a keep-left experiment involving interactions of pedestrians and cyclists on a shared footpath in Singapore as a case study. Data collection entailed before-and-after on-site perception surveys and naturalistic observations from field-recorded video footages. The perception surveys involved 120 pedestrians and 119 cyclists in the before period, and 59 pedestrians and 60 cyclists in the after period. Movement profiles were captured for 303 pedestrians, 148 cyclists, and 90 pedestrian-cyclist interactions for the before period, and 262, 174, and 76, respectively for the after period. The findings suggest that the “keep left” markings on the footpath are generally effective in improving users’ behavioral intention in keeping left. However, whereas cyclists did change their behavior, pedestrians did not do so which is rationalized as being due to their previously formed habit. The findings reveal a weak intention-behavior relationship for pedestrians’ habitual behavior. As consistent with the unchanged pedestrians’ behavior, no distinct changes in the pedestrian-cyclist interaction patterns were observed after the “keep left” treatment. There was no significant change in the perceived conflict level and the safety level as well.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sustainable Transportation provides a discussion forum for the exchange of new and innovative ideas on sustainable transportation research in the context of environmental, economical, social, and engineering aspects, as well as current and future interactions of transportation systems and other urban subsystems. The scope includes the examination of overall sustainability of any transportation system, including its infrastructure, vehicle, operation, and maintenance; the integration of social science disciplines, engineering, and information technology with transportation; the understanding of the comparative aspects of different transportation systems from a global perspective; qualitative and quantitative transportation studies; and case studies, surveys, and expository papers in an international or local context. Equal emphasis is placed on the problems of sustainable transportation that are associated with passenger and freight transportation modes in both industrialized and non-industrialized areas. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert reviewers. All peer review is single-blind. Submissions are made online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信