T. Frick, Alana G. Schnitz, Ky Cosand, Eva M. Horn, Kathleen N. Zimmerman
{"title":"早期干预文献中的剂量报告:系统综述","authors":"T. Frick, Alana G. Schnitz, Ky Cosand, Eva M. Horn, Kathleen N. Zimmerman","doi":"10.1177/02711214231159603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review explores the topic of Part C Early Intervention (EI) dosage reporting and decision-making factors. From an extensive search following PRISMA guidelines, we identified 14 interdisciplinary studies (combination of descriptive, correlational, mixed method, qualitative, and single case design) that met the criteria and synthesized them based on the reported definitions and data of EI dosage components, including frequency, duration, and intensity, as well as factors associated with this data at child, family, and community levels. Results indicate frequency was most reported, whereas duration and intensity were inconsistently reported, as were service delivery models. The inconsistency of reporting did not allow for interpretations of effective dosage; however, disparities based on different factors are shared. Results and discussion are provided for each level of factors, such as family demographics, insurance enrollment, and disability classification. Implications for further research and practice, especially for EI dosage decision-making and reporting, are included.","PeriodicalId":47496,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Early Childhood Special Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosage Reporting in Early Intervention Literature: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"T. Frick, Alana G. Schnitz, Ky Cosand, Eva M. Horn, Kathleen N. Zimmerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02711214231159603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This systematic review explores the topic of Part C Early Intervention (EI) dosage reporting and decision-making factors. From an extensive search following PRISMA guidelines, we identified 14 interdisciplinary studies (combination of descriptive, correlational, mixed method, qualitative, and single case design) that met the criteria and synthesized them based on the reported definitions and data of EI dosage components, including frequency, duration, and intensity, as well as factors associated with this data at child, family, and community levels. Results indicate frequency was most reported, whereas duration and intensity were inconsistently reported, as were service delivery models. The inconsistency of reporting did not allow for interpretations of effective dosage; however, disparities based on different factors are shared. Results and discussion are provided for each level of factors, such as family demographics, insurance enrollment, and disability classification. Implications for further research and practice, especially for EI dosage decision-making and reporting, are included.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Early Childhood Special Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Early Childhood Special Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214231159603\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Early Childhood Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214231159603","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dosage Reporting in Early Intervention Literature: A Systematic Review
This systematic review explores the topic of Part C Early Intervention (EI) dosage reporting and decision-making factors. From an extensive search following PRISMA guidelines, we identified 14 interdisciplinary studies (combination of descriptive, correlational, mixed method, qualitative, and single case design) that met the criteria and synthesized them based on the reported definitions and data of EI dosage components, including frequency, duration, and intensity, as well as factors associated with this data at child, family, and community levels. Results indicate frequency was most reported, whereas duration and intensity were inconsistently reported, as were service delivery models. The inconsistency of reporting did not allow for interpretations of effective dosage; however, disparities based on different factors are shared. Results and discussion are provided for each level of factors, such as family demographics, insurance enrollment, and disability classification. Implications for further research and practice, especially for EI dosage decision-making and reporting, are included.
期刊介绍:
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education (TECSE) communicates information about early intervention, which is defined broadly and includes services provided to (a) infants, toddlers, and preschoolers who are at risk for or display developmental delays and disabilities and (b) the families of such youngsters. TECSE includes articles on personnel preparation, policy issues, and operation of intervention programs. The intent is to publish information that will improve the lives of young children and their families. Manuscripts from (a) diverse theoretical perspectives, (b) all disciplines related to early intervention, and (c) all authors with information of value to the early intervention community are welcome. There are two topical issues—which address an identified problem, trend, or subject of concern and importance to early intervention—and two non-topical issues.