diabetıc患者的电生理调查:根刺激和自主神经调查

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
T. Incesu, Aysel Taşkın, Y. Seçil, Ş. Arıcı, N. Gürgör, F. Tokuçoğlu, G. Akhan, C. Erteki̇n
{"title":"diabetıc患者的电生理调查:根刺激和自主神经调查","authors":"T. Incesu, Aysel Taşkın, Y. Seçil, Ş. Arıcı, N. Gürgör, F. Tokuçoğlu, G. Akhan, C. Erteki̇n","doi":"10.4103/nsn.nsn_41_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of the study is to search proximal nerve involvement by using proximal root stimulation and possible autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients with and without distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN). Patients and Methods: Forty patients with type 2 diabetes and ten volunteers who had no history of diabetes and neuropathy were included. Diabetic patients were equally distributed into two groups according to nerve conduction studies (NCSs): First group comprised of with electrophysiologically confirmed DSPN and second group with normal NCSs. Electrophysiological tests included motor and sensory nerve conduction, needle electromyography, F-response, H-reflex, R-R interval, and sympathetic skin responses (SSRs) studies as well as lumbar root stimulation and cauda equina motor conduction time (CEMCT) calculation. Results: The patients with DSPN had significantly longer F-response latencies and had no H-reflex while H-reflex was observed in 35% of the patients in second group. In the first group, SSRs could not be obtained from both upper and lower limbs in 45% of the patients; however, in the second group, they were absent only in 10% of patients in lower limbs. R-R interval variability was significantly lower in both diabetic groups than volunteers. When compared to the volunteers, cauda equine motor conduction time was significantly prolonged in all diabetic patients, but there was no significant difference between the patient groups. Conclusions: CEMCT prolongation, absence of H-reflex, and decreased R-R interval abnormalities indicating dysautonomia were the most important findings of our study. These results show that early electrophysiological examinations using these methods are important in diabetic patients without polyneuropathy.","PeriodicalId":48555,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","volume":"40 1","pages":"1 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrophysiological investigations in diabetıc patients: Root stimulation and autonomic investigations\",\"authors\":\"T. Incesu, Aysel Taşkın, Y. Seçil, Ş. Arıcı, N. Gürgör, F. Tokuçoğlu, G. Akhan, C. Erteki̇n\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/nsn.nsn_41_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The aim of the study is to search proximal nerve involvement by using proximal root stimulation and possible autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients with and without distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN). Patients and Methods: Forty patients with type 2 diabetes and ten volunteers who had no history of diabetes and neuropathy were included. Diabetic patients were equally distributed into two groups according to nerve conduction studies (NCSs): First group comprised of with electrophysiologically confirmed DSPN and second group with normal NCSs. Electrophysiological tests included motor and sensory nerve conduction, needle electromyography, F-response, H-reflex, R-R interval, and sympathetic skin responses (SSRs) studies as well as lumbar root stimulation and cauda equina motor conduction time (CEMCT) calculation. Results: The patients with DSPN had significantly longer F-response latencies and had no H-reflex while H-reflex was observed in 35% of the patients in second group. In the first group, SSRs could not be obtained from both upper and lower limbs in 45% of the patients; however, in the second group, they were absent only in 10% of patients in lower limbs. R-R interval variability was significantly lower in both diabetic groups than volunteers. When compared to the volunteers, cauda equine motor conduction time was significantly prolonged in all diabetic patients, but there was no significant difference between the patient groups. Conclusions: CEMCT prolongation, absence of H-reflex, and decreased R-R interval abnormalities indicating dysautonomia were the most important findings of our study. These results show that early electrophysiological examinations using these methods are important in diabetic patients without polyneuropathy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/nsn.nsn_41_22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nsn.nsn_41_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:本研究的目的是通过使用近端根刺激和可能的自主神经病变来研究患有和不患有远端对称性感觉运动多发性神经病(DSPN)的2型糖尿病患者的近端神经受累情况。患者和方法:纳入40名2型糖尿病患者和10名无糖尿病和神经病变病史的志愿者。根据神经传导研究(NCSs),糖尿病患者平均分为两组:第一组由电生理学证实的DSPN组成,第二组为正常NCSs。电生理测试包括运动和感觉神经传导、针肌电图、F反应、H反射、R-R间期和交感皮肤反应(SSRs)研究,以及腰根刺激和马尾运动传导时间(CECT)计算。结果:DSPN患者的F反应潜伏期明显延长,没有H反射,而第二组35%的患者观察到H反射。在第一组中,45%的患者无法从上肢和下肢获得SSRs;然而,在第二组中,只有10%的下肢患者没有出现这种情况。两组糖尿病患者的R-R间期变异性均显著低于志愿者。与志愿者相比,所有糖尿病患者的马尾运动传导时间都显著延长,但患者组之间没有显著差异。结论:CEMCT延长、H反射缺失和R-R间期异常减少是我们研究的最重要结果。这些结果表明,使用这些方法进行早期电生理检查对没有多发性神经病的糖尿病患者很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrophysiological investigations in diabetıc patients: Root stimulation and autonomic investigations
Introduction: The aim of the study is to search proximal nerve involvement by using proximal root stimulation and possible autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients with and without distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN). Patients and Methods: Forty patients with type 2 diabetes and ten volunteers who had no history of diabetes and neuropathy were included. Diabetic patients were equally distributed into two groups according to nerve conduction studies (NCSs): First group comprised of with electrophysiologically confirmed DSPN and second group with normal NCSs. Electrophysiological tests included motor and sensory nerve conduction, needle electromyography, F-response, H-reflex, R-R interval, and sympathetic skin responses (SSRs) studies as well as lumbar root stimulation and cauda equina motor conduction time (CEMCT) calculation. Results: The patients with DSPN had significantly longer F-response latencies and had no H-reflex while H-reflex was observed in 35% of the patients in second group. In the first group, SSRs could not be obtained from both upper and lower limbs in 45% of the patients; however, in the second group, they were absent only in 10% of patients in lower limbs. R-R interval variability was significantly lower in both diabetic groups than volunteers. When compared to the volunteers, cauda equine motor conduction time was significantly prolonged in all diabetic patients, but there was no significant difference between the patient groups. Conclusions: CEMCT prolongation, absence of H-reflex, and decreased R-R interval abnormalities indicating dysautonomia were the most important findings of our study. These results show that early electrophysiological examinations using these methods are important in diabetic patients without polyneuropathy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology is the double blind peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of Turkish Society of Clinical Neurophysiology EEG-EMG. The journal is a quarterly publication, published in March, June, September and December and the publication language of the journal is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信