对本科食品加工课程中无麸质实验室练习的评估

Q2 Social Sciences
Melanie L. Herman, Janae Brown, Umut Yucel, Kelly J. K. Getty
{"title":"对本科食品加工课程中无麸质实验室练习的评估","authors":"Melanie L. Herman,&nbsp;Janae Brown,&nbsp;Umut Yucel,&nbsp;Kelly J. K. Getty","doi":"10.1111/1541-4329.12234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is a growing body of research that suggests better course outcomes for instructors that incorporate active learning into their curriculum. Laboratory exercises can be used to promote active learning. The objective of this study was to develop and assess the efficacy of a gluten-free bread laboratory exercise for an undergraduate course (Fundamentals of Food Processing). Students enrolled in the course worked in groups to prepare four treatments: 100% white whole grain sorghum as control (C), 15% burgundy waxy sorghum (15W), 25% burgundy waxy sorghum (25W), and 35% burgundy waxy sorghum (35W) in a gluten-free bread formulation. Students evaluated physical properties (yield, loaf height, color, water activity) using analytical measurements, and organoleptic properties (appearance, color, texture, flavor, and overall acceptability) via sensory analysis on a hedonic scale. Students wrote a scientific report to communicate the results. At the completion of the lab, students answered survey questions (<i>n</i> = 53 or 85% of the class) to self-evaluate their understanding of gluten-free bread properties, research and writing skills, and food processing knowledge. Sixty percent or more of the students said that the exercise improved their understanding of the physical and sensory properties of gluten-free bread. Over 68% of students agreed or strongly agreed that the exercise reinforced their research and writing skills. Over 75% of respondents felt the exercise improved their food processing knowledge. Overall, the results of the survey indicated that the active lab exercise was effective in teaching the desired learning outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4329.12234","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of a gluten-free laboratory exercise in an undergraduate food processing course\",\"authors\":\"Melanie L. Herman,&nbsp;Janae Brown,&nbsp;Umut Yucel,&nbsp;Kelly J. K. Getty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1541-4329.12234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There is a growing body of research that suggests better course outcomes for instructors that incorporate active learning into their curriculum. Laboratory exercises can be used to promote active learning. The objective of this study was to develop and assess the efficacy of a gluten-free bread laboratory exercise for an undergraduate course (Fundamentals of Food Processing). Students enrolled in the course worked in groups to prepare four treatments: 100% white whole grain sorghum as control (C), 15% burgundy waxy sorghum (15W), 25% burgundy waxy sorghum (25W), and 35% burgundy waxy sorghum (35W) in a gluten-free bread formulation. Students evaluated physical properties (yield, loaf height, color, water activity) using analytical measurements, and organoleptic properties (appearance, color, texture, flavor, and overall acceptability) via sensory analysis on a hedonic scale. Students wrote a scientific report to communicate the results. At the completion of the lab, students answered survey questions (<i>n</i> = 53 or 85% of the class) to self-evaluate their understanding of gluten-free bread properties, research and writing skills, and food processing knowledge. Sixty percent or more of the students said that the exercise improved their understanding of the physical and sensory properties of gluten-free bread. Over 68% of students agreed or strongly agreed that the exercise reinforced their research and writing skills. Over 75% of respondents felt the exercise improved their food processing knowledge. Overall, the results of the survey indicated that the active lab exercise was effective in teaching the desired learning outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1541-4329.12234\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4329.12234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4329.12234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的研究表明,将主动学习纳入课程的教师会获得更好的课程效果。实验练习可以用来促进主动学习。本研究的目的是开发和评估无麸质面包实验室练习的有效性,用于本科课程(食品加工基础)。参加该课程的学生分组准备了四种处理方法:100%白全谷物高粱作为对照(C), 15%酒红色高粱(15W), 25%酒红色高粱(25W), 35%酒红色高粱(35W)的无麸质面包配方。学生们通过分析测量来评估物理特性(产量、面包高度、颜色、水分活度),并通过享乐尺度上的感官分析来评估感官特性(外观、颜色、质地、风味和整体可接受性)。学生们写一份科学报告来传达结果。实验结束后,学生们回答了调查问题(n = 53或85%的学生),以自我评估他们对无麸质面包特性、研究和写作技能以及食品加工知识的理解。60%或更多的学生表示,这种练习提高了他们对无麸质面包的物理和感官特性的理解。超过68%的学生同意或强烈同意该练习增强了他们的研究和写作技能。超过75%的受访者认为练习提高了他们的食品加工知识。总体而言,调查结果表明,积极的实验室练习是有效的教学预期的学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of a gluten-free laboratory exercise in an undergraduate food processing course

Assessment of a gluten-free laboratory exercise in an undergraduate food processing course

There is a growing body of research that suggests better course outcomes for instructors that incorporate active learning into their curriculum. Laboratory exercises can be used to promote active learning. The objective of this study was to develop and assess the efficacy of a gluten-free bread laboratory exercise for an undergraduate course (Fundamentals of Food Processing). Students enrolled in the course worked in groups to prepare four treatments: 100% white whole grain sorghum as control (C), 15% burgundy waxy sorghum (15W), 25% burgundy waxy sorghum (25W), and 35% burgundy waxy sorghum (35W) in a gluten-free bread formulation. Students evaluated physical properties (yield, loaf height, color, water activity) using analytical measurements, and organoleptic properties (appearance, color, texture, flavor, and overall acceptability) via sensory analysis on a hedonic scale. Students wrote a scientific report to communicate the results. At the completion of the lab, students answered survey questions (n = 53 or 85% of the class) to self-evaluate their understanding of gluten-free bread properties, research and writing skills, and food processing knowledge. Sixty percent or more of the students said that the exercise improved their understanding of the physical and sensory properties of gluten-free bread. Over 68% of students agreed or strongly agreed that the exercise reinforced their research and writing skills. Over 75% of respondents felt the exercise improved their food processing knowledge. Overall, the results of the survey indicated that the active lab exercise was effective in teaching the desired learning outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science Education
Journal of Food Science Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) publishes the Journal of Food Science Education (JFSE) to serve the interest of its members in the field of food science education at all levels. The journal is aimed at all those committed to the improvement of food science education, including primary, secondary, undergraduate and graduate, continuing, and workplace education. It serves as an international forum for scholarly and innovative development in all aspects of food science education for "teachers" (individuals who facilitate, mentor, or instruct) and "students" (individuals who are the focus of learning efforts).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信