缩小科学领域的性别差距:来自中国城市的新证据

IF 1.2 Q3 Social Sciences
Weili Ding, Yipeng Tang, Yongmei Hu
{"title":"缩小科学领域的性别差距:来自中国城市的新证据","authors":"Weili Ding, Yipeng Tang, Yongmei Hu","doi":"10.1080/09645292.2022.2113858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, we analyze recently collected data that conducts a unique assessment of high school student performance for over two thousand students from five Chinese provinces. Across three domains of scientific intelligence tested, we document heterogeneous gender gaps in academic performance. These differences generally arise due to differential productivity of inputs to the education production process and not differential levels of inputs. At many quantiles of the achievement distribution, girls perform better than boys when identifying scientific issues, whereas the converse holds on the portion of the assessment that measures whether one can apply scientific evidence. These differences may partially explain the subsequent gap in decision to major in specific STEM disciplines in college. Further, our results imply caution from using a single summative gender achievement gap measure when gender gaps in subject knowledge are not constant across each domain of intelligence examined within the test.","PeriodicalId":46682,"journal":{"name":"Education Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closing the gender gap in science: new evidence from urban China\",\"authors\":\"Weili Ding, Yipeng Tang, Yongmei Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09645292.2022.2113858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this paper, we analyze recently collected data that conducts a unique assessment of high school student performance for over two thousand students from five Chinese provinces. Across three domains of scientific intelligence tested, we document heterogeneous gender gaps in academic performance. These differences generally arise due to differential productivity of inputs to the education production process and not differential levels of inputs. At many quantiles of the achievement distribution, girls perform better than boys when identifying scientific issues, whereas the converse holds on the portion of the assessment that measures whether one can apply scientific evidence. These differences may partially explain the subsequent gap in decision to major in specific STEM disciplines in college. Further, our results imply caution from using a single summative gender achievement gap measure when gender gaps in subject knowledge are not constant across each domain of intelligence examined within the test.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2022.2113858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2022.2113858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要在本文中,我们分析了最近收集的数据,这些数据对来自中国五个省份的2000多名学生的高中生表现进行了独特的评估。在测试的三个科学智力领域中,我们记录了学习成绩中的异质性性别差距。这些差异通常是由于教育生产过程投入的生产力不同,而不是投入水平不同。在成绩分布的许多分位数上,女孩在识别科学问题时表现得比男孩好,而在衡量一个人是否能够应用科学证据的评估部分,情况正好相反。这些差异可能部分解释了随后在大学主修特定STEM学科的决定上的差距。此外,我们的研究结果表明,当在测试中检查的每个智力领域中,科目知识的性别差距并不恒定时,不要使用单一的总结性性别成就差距衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Closing the gender gap in science: new evidence from urban China
ABSTRACT In this paper, we analyze recently collected data that conducts a unique assessment of high school student performance for over two thousand students from five Chinese provinces. Across three domains of scientific intelligence tested, we document heterogeneous gender gaps in academic performance. These differences generally arise due to differential productivity of inputs to the education production process and not differential levels of inputs. At many quantiles of the achievement distribution, girls perform better than boys when identifying scientific issues, whereas the converse holds on the portion of the assessment that measures whether one can apply scientific evidence. These differences may partially explain the subsequent gap in decision to major in specific STEM disciplines in college. Further, our results imply caution from using a single summative gender achievement gap measure when gender gaps in subject knowledge are not constant across each domain of intelligence examined within the test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education Economics
Education Economics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Education Economics is a peer-reviewed journal serving as a forum for debate in all areas of the economics and management of education. Particular emphasis is given to the "quantitative" aspects of educational management which involve numerate disciplines such as economics and operational research. The content is of international appeal and is not limited to material of a technical nature. Applied work with clear policy implications is especially encouraged. Readership of the journal includes academics in the field of education, economics and management; civil servants and local government officials responsible for education and manpower planning; educational managers at the level of the individual school or college.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信