Anna V. Kasyanova , Inna A. Zvonareva , Natalia A. Tarasova , Lei Bi , Dmitry A. Medvedev , Zongping Shao
{"title":"质子陶瓷电化学电池用电解质材料:主要局限性和潜在解决方案","authors":"Anna V. Kasyanova , Inna A. Zvonareva , Natalia A. Tarasova , Lei Bi , Dmitry A. Medvedev , Zongping Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.matre.2022.100158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) and electrolysis cells (SOECs) are promising energy conversion devices, on whose basis green hydrogen energy technologies can be developed to support the transition to a carbon-free future. As compared with oxygen-conducting cells, the operational temperatures of protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs) and electrolysis cells (PCECs) can be reduced by several hundreds of degrees (down to low- and intermediate-temperature ranges of 400–700 °C) while maintaining high performance and efficiency. This is due to the distinctive characteristics of charge carriers for proton-conducting electrolytes. However, despite achieving outstanding lab-scale performance, the prospects for industrial scaling of PCFCs and PCECs remain hazy, at least in the near future, in contrast to commercially available SOFCs and SOECs. In this review, we reveal the reasons for the delayed technological development, which need to be addressed in order to transfer fundamental findings into industrial processes. Possible solutions to the identified problems are also highlighted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":61638,"journal":{"name":"材料导报:能源(英文)","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666935822001057/pdfft?md5=3ea2a3a94fc64e47657c77eb792bceb7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666935822001057-main.pdf","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrolyte materials for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells: Main limitations and potential solutions\",\"authors\":\"Anna V. Kasyanova , Inna A. Zvonareva , Natalia A. Tarasova , Lei Bi , Dmitry A. Medvedev , Zongping Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.matre.2022.100158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) and electrolysis cells (SOECs) are promising energy conversion devices, on whose basis green hydrogen energy technologies can be developed to support the transition to a carbon-free future. As compared with oxygen-conducting cells, the operational temperatures of protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs) and electrolysis cells (PCECs) can be reduced by several hundreds of degrees (down to low- and intermediate-temperature ranges of 400–700 °C) while maintaining high performance and efficiency. This is due to the distinctive characteristics of charge carriers for proton-conducting electrolytes. However, despite achieving outstanding lab-scale performance, the prospects for industrial scaling of PCFCs and PCECs remain hazy, at least in the near future, in contrast to commercially available SOFCs and SOECs. In this review, we reveal the reasons for the delayed technological development, which need to be addressed in order to transfer fundamental findings into industrial processes. Possible solutions to the identified problems are also highlighted.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":61638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"材料导报:能源(英文)\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666935822001057/pdfft?md5=3ea2a3a94fc64e47657c77eb792bceb7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666935822001057-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"材料导报:能源(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666935822001057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"材料导报:能源(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666935822001057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrolyte materials for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells: Main limitations and potential solutions
Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) and electrolysis cells (SOECs) are promising energy conversion devices, on whose basis green hydrogen energy technologies can be developed to support the transition to a carbon-free future. As compared with oxygen-conducting cells, the operational temperatures of protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs) and electrolysis cells (PCECs) can be reduced by several hundreds of degrees (down to low- and intermediate-temperature ranges of 400–700 °C) while maintaining high performance and efficiency. This is due to the distinctive characteristics of charge carriers for proton-conducting electrolytes. However, despite achieving outstanding lab-scale performance, the prospects for industrial scaling of PCFCs and PCECs remain hazy, at least in the near future, in contrast to commercially available SOFCs and SOECs. In this review, we reveal the reasons for the delayed technological development, which need to be addressed in order to transfer fundamental findings into industrial processes. Possible solutions to the identified problems are also highlighted.