西班牙师范生的价值观与生活满意度

IF 1.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
F. Huertas‐Delgado, Loreto Gómez López-Quiñones, D. C. Mariscal, Rocío Tejero Olmedo, Enrique García Jiménez, Natalia Reyes Ruiz de Peralta
{"title":"西班牙师范生的价值观与生活满意度","authors":"F. Huertas‐Delgado, Loreto Gómez López-Quiñones, D. C. Mariscal, Rocío Tejero Olmedo, Enrique García Jiménez, Natalia Reyes Ruiz de Peralta","doi":"10.17583/ijep.2020.4143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purposes of this study were to describe teacher education students’ values and degree of satisfaction with life, to analyze whether any differences by educational program, gender or living standard and to analyze the association between values and satisfaction with life. A total of 565 students of teacher degree programs (girls 415 (73.5%)) answered a self-administered questionnaire composed by two validates scales about their values (Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ) and satisfaction with life (Satisfaction with Life Scale)). The results showed that the most important values were self-direction, benevolence and hedonism, while the least important values were power, tradition and achievements. Females reported higher importance for benevolence, universalism, self-direction, stimulation, hedonism and security. Males reported higher importance for power. Students who live with family reported also more high values for power. Concerning satisfaction with life, it was associated to higher values of power. Current intervention programs have focused different approaches by gender and living standard. Programs focus on increasing satisfaction with life should consider the values structure of students.","PeriodicalId":44173,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spanish Teacher Education Students’ Values and Satisfaction with Life\",\"authors\":\"F. Huertas‐Delgado, Loreto Gómez López-Quiñones, D. C. Mariscal, Rocío Tejero Olmedo, Enrique García Jiménez, Natalia Reyes Ruiz de Peralta\",\"doi\":\"10.17583/ijep.2020.4143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main purposes of this study were to describe teacher education students’ values and degree of satisfaction with life, to analyze whether any differences by educational program, gender or living standard and to analyze the association between values and satisfaction with life. A total of 565 students of teacher degree programs (girls 415 (73.5%)) answered a self-administered questionnaire composed by two validates scales about their values (Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ) and satisfaction with life (Satisfaction with Life Scale)). The results showed that the most important values were self-direction, benevolence and hedonism, while the least important values were power, tradition and achievements. Females reported higher importance for benevolence, universalism, self-direction, stimulation, hedonism and security. Males reported higher importance for power. Students who live with family reported also more high values for power. Concerning satisfaction with life, it was associated to higher values of power. Current intervention programs have focused different approaches by gender and living standard. Programs focus on increasing satisfaction with life should consider the values structure of students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Educational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2020.4143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2020.4143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的主要目的是描述教师教育学生的价值观和生活满意度,分析教育计划、性别或生活水平是否存在差异,并分析价值观与生活满意度之间的关系。共有565名教师学位学生(其中女生415人(73.5%))回答了一份由两种价值观验证量表(肖像价值观问卷(PVQ)和生活满意度量表(生活满意度量表)组成的自填问卷。结果表明,大学生最看重的价值观是自我导向、仁爱和享乐主义,最不看重的价值观是权力、传统和成就。女性对仁爱、普世主义、自我导向、刺激、享乐主义和安全感的重视程度更高。男性更看重权力。与家人同住的学生也报告了更高的权力价值观。就生活满意度而言,它与更高的权力价值有关。目前的干预方案侧重于根据性别和生活水平不同的方法。注重提高生活满意度的课程应该考虑学生的价值观结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spanish Teacher Education Students’ Values and Satisfaction with Life
The main purposes of this study were to describe teacher education students’ values and degree of satisfaction with life, to analyze whether any differences by educational program, gender or living standard and to analyze the association between values and satisfaction with life. A total of 565 students of teacher degree programs (girls 415 (73.5%)) answered a self-administered questionnaire composed by two validates scales about their values (Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ) and satisfaction with life (Satisfaction with Life Scale)). The results showed that the most important values were self-direction, benevolence and hedonism, while the least important values were power, tradition and achievements. Females reported higher importance for benevolence, universalism, self-direction, stimulation, hedonism and security. Males reported higher importance for power. Students who live with family reported also more high values for power. Concerning satisfaction with life, it was associated to higher values of power. Current intervention programs have focused different approaches by gender and living standard. Programs focus on increasing satisfaction with life should consider the values structure of students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信