非本发明综合征的前因和创新结果——在个人、管理和组织层面的检验

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Anu Vanska, Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen
{"title":"非本发明综合征的前因和创新结果——在个人、管理和组织层面的检验","authors":"Anu Vanska,&nbsp;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A negatively shaped attitude-based bias towards external knowledge—the not-invented-here (NIH) syndrome—may constitute a significant obstacle for effective adoption of external knowledge and impair organizational innovativeness. The goal of this study is to shed light to the question how organizational and managerial features drive individual NIH, and how NIH connects further to individual innovativeness. Analysis of survey data collected from 93 employees reveals a joint effect of person-organization fit and leader-member exchange on NIH, and a negative association between NIH and innovative work behavior. Contrary to expectations, person-organization fit and perceived innovativeness of organizational culture do not have joint effects on NIH. The findings contribute to the development of a theoretical model of the interplay between individual-, managerial- and organizational-level antecedents and consequences of the NIH syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"30 2","pages":"191-199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antecedents and innovation outcomes of not-invented-here syndrome – Examination at individual, managerial, and organizational levels\",\"authors\":\"Anu Vanska,&nbsp;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/kpm.1725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A negatively shaped attitude-based bias towards external knowledge—the not-invented-here (NIH) syndrome—may constitute a significant obstacle for effective adoption of external knowledge and impair organizational innovativeness. The goal of this study is to shed light to the question how organizational and managerial features drive individual NIH, and how NIH connects further to individual innovativeness. Analysis of survey data collected from 93 employees reveals a joint effect of person-organization fit and leader-member exchange on NIH, and a negative association between NIH and innovative work behavior. Contrary to expectations, person-organization fit and perceived innovativeness of organizational culture do not have joint effects on NIH. The findings contribute to the development of a theoretical model of the interplay between individual-, managerial- and organizational-level antecedents and consequences of the NIH syndrome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowledge and Process Management\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"191-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowledge and Process Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对外部知识的消极态度偏见——非本发明(NIH)综合症——可能构成有效采用外部知识的重大障碍,并损害组织的创新性。本研究的目的是阐明组织和管理特征如何驱动个体NIH,以及NIH如何进一步与个体创新相联系的问题。通过对93名员工的调查数据分析,发现个人-组织契合度和领导-成员交换对创新工作行为有共同影响,而创新工作行为与创新工作行为有负相关关系。与预期相反,个人与组织的契合度和组织文化的感知创新性对NIH并没有共同的影响。这些发现有助于发展个人、管理和组织层面的NIH综合征的前因和后果之间相互作用的理论模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antecedents and innovation outcomes of not-invented-here syndrome – Examination at individual, managerial, and organizational levels

A negatively shaped attitude-based bias towards external knowledge—the not-invented-here (NIH) syndrome—may constitute a significant obstacle for effective adoption of external knowledge and impair organizational innovativeness. The goal of this study is to shed light to the question how organizational and managerial features drive individual NIH, and how NIH connects further to individual innovativeness. Analysis of survey data collected from 93 employees reveals a joint effect of person-organization fit and leader-member exchange on NIH, and a negative association between NIH and innovative work behavior. Contrary to expectations, person-organization fit and perceived innovativeness of organizational culture do not have joint effects on NIH. The findings contribute to the development of a theoretical model of the interplay between individual-, managerial- and organizational-level antecedents and consequences of the NIH syndrome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信