到底是谁的救助?政治在公私合营小企业与银行救助中的作用

IF 3.1 1区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Allen N. Berger , Mustafa U. Karakaplan , Raluca A. Roman
{"title":"到底是谁的救助?政治在公私合营小企业与银行救助中的作用","authors":"Allen N. Berger ,&nbsp;Mustafa U. Karakaplan ,&nbsp;Raluca A. Roman","doi":"10.1016/j.jfi.2023.101044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>We address whether politics played important roles in allocating Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) bailout funds, and whether PPP allocations effectively bailed out small businesses vs. banks. Our </span>econometric evidence suggests that politicians/other government agents at </span><em>national</em> and <em>local</em> levels effectively steered PPP funds toward small businesses and banks based on their locations to try to influence election outcomes. We also uncover evidence that some PPP funds were effectively allocated by lobbying efforts of certain banks. Findings are confirmed by a novel mediation analysis and numerous robustness checks. We also find banks profited from PPP through multiple channels, adding to extant findings, and suggesting that PPP may have effectively bailed out banks as well as small businesses, but through different political influences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Intermediation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whose bailout is it anyway? The roles of politics in PPP bailouts of small businesses vs. banks\",\"authors\":\"Allen N. Berger ,&nbsp;Mustafa U. Karakaplan ,&nbsp;Raluca A. Roman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfi.2023.101044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>We address whether politics played important roles in allocating Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) bailout funds, and whether PPP allocations effectively bailed out small businesses vs. banks. Our </span>econometric evidence suggests that politicians/other government agents at </span><em>national</em> and <em>local</em> levels effectively steered PPP funds toward small businesses and banks based on their locations to try to influence election outcomes. We also uncover evidence that some PPP funds were effectively allocated by lobbying efforts of certain banks. Findings are confirmed by a novel mediation analysis and numerous robustness checks. We also find banks profited from PPP through multiple channels, adding to extant findings, and suggesting that PPP may have effectively bailed out banks as well as small businesses, but through different political influences.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Intermediation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Intermediation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104295732300027X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Intermediation","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104295732300027X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们讨论了政治是否在分配工资支票保护计划(PPP)救助资金方面发挥了重要作用,以及PPP拨款是否有效地救助了小企业与银行。我们的计量经济学证据表明,国家和地方层面的政治家/其他政府机构有效地根据小企业和银行的位置将PPP资金引导到小企业和小银行,试图影响选举结果。我们还发现有证据表明,一些PPP资金是通过某些银行的游说活动有效分配的。一项新颖的中介分析和大量的稳健性检查证实了这一发现。我们还发现,银行通过多种渠道从PPP中获利,这增加了现有的调查结果,并表明PPP可能通过不同的政治影响有效地拯救了银行和小企业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whose bailout is it anyway? The roles of politics in PPP bailouts of small businesses vs. banks

We address whether politics played important roles in allocating Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) bailout funds, and whether PPP allocations effectively bailed out small businesses vs. banks. Our econometric evidence suggests that politicians/other government agents at national and local levels effectively steered PPP funds toward small businesses and banks based on their locations to try to influence election outcomes. We also uncover evidence that some PPP funds were effectively allocated by lobbying efforts of certain banks. Findings are confirmed by a novel mediation analysis and numerous robustness checks. We also find banks profited from PPP through multiple channels, adding to extant findings, and suggesting that PPP may have effectively bailed out banks as well as small businesses, but through different political influences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Intermediation seeks to publish research in the broad areas of financial intermediation, financial market structure, corporate finance, risk management, and valuation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信